Baseline event rate, the Concorde fallacy, and the topography of cardiac risk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Cardiac risk stratification is the attempt to delineate who is at risk of cardiac event and who is not. Increasingly, the medical literature is filled with novel methods and markers of baseline risk assessment. This body of literature has been criticized broadly for making claims beyond what is statistically justified. In this hypothesis, we will explore an alterative explanation for the limitations of baseline risk assessment. I will contend that current risk models commit a logical error called the Concorde fallacy. The role of risk topography will be suggested as a novel method to rescue cardiac risk models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)639-641
Number of pages3
JournalMedical Hypotheses
Volume75
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Baseline event rate, the Concorde fallacy, and the topography of cardiac risk. / Prasad, Vinay.

In: Medical Hypotheses, Vol. 75, No. 6, 12.2010, p. 639-641.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{88680a0218d9463f8b43c765f737f502,
title = "Baseline event rate, the Concorde fallacy, and the topography of cardiac risk",
abstract = "Cardiac risk stratification is the attempt to delineate who is at risk of cardiac event and who is not. Increasingly, the medical literature is filled with novel methods and markers of baseline risk assessment. This body of literature has been criticized broadly for making claims beyond what is statistically justified. In this hypothesis, we will explore an alterative explanation for the limitations of baseline risk assessment. I will contend that current risk models commit a logical error called the Concorde fallacy. The role of risk topography will be suggested as a novel method to rescue cardiac risk models.",
author = "Vinay Prasad",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.mehy.2010.08.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "639--641",
journal = "Medical Hypotheses",
issn = "0306-9877",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Baseline event rate, the Concorde fallacy, and the topography of cardiac risk

AU - Prasad, Vinay

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Cardiac risk stratification is the attempt to delineate who is at risk of cardiac event and who is not. Increasingly, the medical literature is filled with novel methods and markers of baseline risk assessment. This body of literature has been criticized broadly for making claims beyond what is statistically justified. In this hypothesis, we will explore an alterative explanation for the limitations of baseline risk assessment. I will contend that current risk models commit a logical error called the Concorde fallacy. The role of risk topography will be suggested as a novel method to rescue cardiac risk models.

AB - Cardiac risk stratification is the attempt to delineate who is at risk of cardiac event and who is not. Increasingly, the medical literature is filled with novel methods and markers of baseline risk assessment. This body of literature has been criticized broadly for making claims beyond what is statistically justified. In this hypothesis, we will explore an alterative explanation for the limitations of baseline risk assessment. I will contend that current risk models commit a logical error called the Concorde fallacy. The role of risk topography will be suggested as a novel method to rescue cardiac risk models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958456822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958456822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.08.005

DO - 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.08.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 20800366

AN - SCOPUS:77958456822

VL - 75

SP - 639

EP - 641

JO - Medical Hypotheses

JF - Medical Hypotheses

SN - 0306-9877

IS - 6

ER -