Baseline event rate, the Concorde fallacy, and the topography of cardiac risk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cardiac risk stratification is the attempt to delineate who is at risk of cardiac event and who is not. Increasingly, the medical literature is filled with novel methods and markers of baseline risk assessment. This body of literature has been criticized broadly for making claims beyond what is statistically justified. In this hypothesis, we will explore an alterative explanation for the limitations of baseline risk assessment. I will contend that current risk models commit a logical error called the Concorde fallacy. The role of risk topography will be suggested as a novel method to rescue cardiac risk models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)639-641
Number of pages3
JournalMedical Hypotheses
Volume75
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Baseline event rate, the Concorde fallacy, and the topography of cardiac risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this