Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information: A systematic review

Karen Eden, Annette Totten, Steven Kassakian, Paul Gorman, Marian McDonagh, Beth Devine, Miranda Pappas, Monica Daeges, Susan Woods, William (Bill) Hersh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing facilitators and barriers to use of health information exchange (HIE). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases between January 1990 and February 2015 using terms related to HIE. English-language studies that identified barriers and facilitators of actual HIE were included. Data on study design, risk of bias, setting, geographic location, characteristics of the HIE, perceived barriers and facilitators to use were extracted and confirmed. Results: Ten cross-sectional, seven multiple-site case studies, and two before-after studies that included data from several sources (surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observations of users) evaluated perceived barriers and facilitators to HIE use. The most commonly cited barriers to HIE use were incomplete information, inefficient workflow, and reports that the exchanged information that did not meet the needs of users. The review identified several facilitators to use. Discussion: Incomplete patient information was consistently mentioned in the studies conducted in the US but not mentioned in the few studies conducted outside of the US that take a collective approach toward healthcare. Individual patients and practices in the US may exercise the right to participate (or not) in HIE which effects the completeness of patient information available to be exchanged. Workflow structure and user roles are key but understudied. Conclusions: We identified several facilitators in the studies that showed promise in promoting electronic health data exchange: obtaining more complete patient information; thoughtful workflow that folds in HIE; and inclusion of users early in implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)44-51
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume88
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Health
Workflow
Geographic Locations
Health Information Exchange
Information Storage and Retrieval
Focus Groups
MEDLINE
Libraries
Language
Databases
Interviews
Exercise
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Attitude to computers
  • Barriers
  • Health information exchange
  • Users perceptions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information : A systematic review. / Eden, Karen; Totten, Annette; Kassakian, Steven; Gorman, Paul; McDonagh, Marian; Devine, Beth; Pappas, Miranda; Daeges, Monica; Woods, Susan; Hersh, William (Bill).

In: International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 88, 01.04.2016, p. 44-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9600c81d5a2f4dab869e1a997c11a403,
title = "Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information: A systematic review",
abstract = "Objectives: We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing facilitators and barriers to use of health information exchange (HIE). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases between January 1990 and February 2015 using terms related to HIE. English-language studies that identified barriers and facilitators of actual HIE were included. Data on study design, risk of bias, setting, geographic location, characteristics of the HIE, perceived barriers and facilitators to use were extracted and confirmed. Results: Ten cross-sectional, seven multiple-site case studies, and two before-after studies that included data from several sources (surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observations of users) evaluated perceived barriers and facilitators to HIE use. The most commonly cited barriers to HIE use were incomplete information, inefficient workflow, and reports that the exchanged information that did not meet the needs of users. The review identified several facilitators to use. Discussion: Incomplete patient information was consistently mentioned in the studies conducted in the US but not mentioned in the few studies conducted outside of the US that take a collective approach toward healthcare. Individual patients and practices in the US may exercise the right to participate (or not) in HIE which effects the completeness of patient information available to be exchanged. Workflow structure and user roles are key but understudied. Conclusions: We identified several facilitators in the studies that showed promise in promoting electronic health data exchange: obtaining more complete patient information; thoughtful workflow that folds in HIE; and inclusion of users early in implementation.",
keywords = "Attitude to computers, Barriers, Health information exchange, Users perceptions",
author = "Karen Eden and Annette Totten and Steven Kassakian and Paul Gorman and Marian McDonagh and Beth Devine and Miranda Pappas and Monica Daeges and Susan Woods and Hersh, {William (Bill)}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "44--51",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Informatics",
issn = "1386-5056",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Eden, Karen

AU - Totten, Annette

AU - Kassakian, Steven

AU - Gorman, Paul

AU - McDonagh, Marian

AU - Devine, Beth

AU - Pappas, Miranda

AU - Daeges, Monica

AU - Woods, Susan

AU - Hersh, William (Bill)

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Objectives: We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing facilitators and barriers to use of health information exchange (HIE). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases between January 1990 and February 2015 using terms related to HIE. English-language studies that identified barriers and facilitators of actual HIE were included. Data on study design, risk of bias, setting, geographic location, characteristics of the HIE, perceived barriers and facilitators to use were extracted and confirmed. Results: Ten cross-sectional, seven multiple-site case studies, and two before-after studies that included data from several sources (surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observations of users) evaluated perceived barriers and facilitators to HIE use. The most commonly cited barriers to HIE use were incomplete information, inefficient workflow, and reports that the exchanged information that did not meet the needs of users. The review identified several facilitators to use. Discussion: Incomplete patient information was consistently mentioned in the studies conducted in the US but not mentioned in the few studies conducted outside of the US that take a collective approach toward healthcare. Individual patients and practices in the US may exercise the right to participate (or not) in HIE which effects the completeness of patient information available to be exchanged. Workflow structure and user roles are key but understudied. Conclusions: We identified several facilitators in the studies that showed promise in promoting electronic health data exchange: obtaining more complete patient information; thoughtful workflow that folds in HIE; and inclusion of users early in implementation.

AB - Objectives: We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing facilitators and barriers to use of health information exchange (HIE). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases between January 1990 and February 2015 using terms related to HIE. English-language studies that identified barriers and facilitators of actual HIE were included. Data on study design, risk of bias, setting, geographic location, characteristics of the HIE, perceived barriers and facilitators to use were extracted and confirmed. Results: Ten cross-sectional, seven multiple-site case studies, and two before-after studies that included data from several sources (surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observations of users) evaluated perceived barriers and facilitators to HIE use. The most commonly cited barriers to HIE use were incomplete information, inefficient workflow, and reports that the exchanged information that did not meet the needs of users. The review identified several facilitators to use. Discussion: Incomplete patient information was consistently mentioned in the studies conducted in the US but not mentioned in the few studies conducted outside of the US that take a collective approach toward healthcare. Individual patients and practices in the US may exercise the right to participate (or not) in HIE which effects the completeness of patient information available to be exchanged. Workflow structure and user roles are key but understudied. Conclusions: We identified several facilitators in the studies that showed promise in promoting electronic health data exchange: obtaining more complete patient information; thoughtful workflow that folds in HIE; and inclusion of users early in implementation.

KW - Attitude to computers

KW - Barriers

KW - Health information exchange

KW - Users perceptions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958225404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958225404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 26878761

AN - SCOPUS:84958225404

VL - 88

SP - 44

EP - 51

JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics

JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics

SN - 1386-5056

ER -