TY - JOUR
T1 - Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Eden, Karen B.
AU - Totten, Annette M.
AU - Kassakian, Steven
AU - Gorman, Paul N.
AU - McDonagh, Marian S.
AU - Devine, Beth
AU - Pappas, Miranda
AU - Daeges, Monica
AU - Woods, Susan
AU - Hersh, William R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was funded under Contract No. 290-2012-00014-I , Task Order 11, from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . The authors of this report are responsible for its content. Statements in the report should not be construed as endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. SK’s was also supported by the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number T15LM007088 .
Funding Information:
AHRQ funded the review but had no role in study selec-tion, quality assessment, or synthesis. The investigators are solelyresponsible for the content. The authors gratefully acknowledge the following individualsfor their contributions to this project: Andrew Hamilton, M.L.S.,M.S., for conducting literature searches and Spencer Dandy, B.S.,for assistance with preparing this manuscript (all are located at theOregon Health & Science University); and Jon White, M.D., TaskOrder Officer (TOO) at the Agency for Healthcare Research andQuality (AHRQ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Objectives: We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing facilitators and barriers to use of health information exchange (HIE). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases between January 1990 and February 2015 using terms related to HIE. English-language studies that identified barriers and facilitators of actual HIE were included. Data on study design, risk of bias, setting, geographic location, characteristics of the HIE, perceived barriers and facilitators to use were extracted and confirmed. Results: Ten cross-sectional, seven multiple-site case studies, and two before-after studies that included data from several sources (surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observations of users) evaluated perceived barriers and facilitators to HIE use. The most commonly cited barriers to HIE use were incomplete information, inefficient workflow, and reports that the exchanged information that did not meet the needs of users. The review identified several facilitators to use. Discussion: Incomplete patient information was consistently mentioned in the studies conducted in the US but not mentioned in the few studies conducted outside of the US that take a collective approach toward healthcare. Individual patients and practices in the US may exercise the right to participate (or not) in HIE which effects the completeness of patient information available to be exchanged. Workflow structure and user roles are key but understudied. Conclusions: We identified several facilitators in the studies that showed promise in promoting electronic health data exchange: obtaining more complete patient information; thoughtful workflow that folds in HIE; and inclusion of users early in implementation.
AB - Objectives: We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing facilitators and barriers to use of health information exchange (HIE). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases between January 1990 and February 2015 using terms related to HIE. English-language studies that identified barriers and facilitators of actual HIE were included. Data on study design, risk of bias, setting, geographic location, characteristics of the HIE, perceived barriers and facilitators to use were extracted and confirmed. Results: Ten cross-sectional, seven multiple-site case studies, and two before-after studies that included data from several sources (surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observations of users) evaluated perceived barriers and facilitators to HIE use. The most commonly cited barriers to HIE use were incomplete information, inefficient workflow, and reports that the exchanged information that did not meet the needs of users. The review identified several facilitators to use. Discussion: Incomplete patient information was consistently mentioned in the studies conducted in the US but not mentioned in the few studies conducted outside of the US that take a collective approach toward healthcare. Individual patients and practices in the US may exercise the right to participate (or not) in HIE which effects the completeness of patient information available to be exchanged. Workflow structure and user roles are key but understudied. Conclusions: We identified several facilitators in the studies that showed promise in promoting electronic health data exchange: obtaining more complete patient information; thoughtful workflow that folds in HIE; and inclusion of users early in implementation.
KW - Attitude to computers
KW - Barriers
KW - Health information exchange
KW - Users perceptions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958225404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958225404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.004
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26878761
AN - SCOPUS:84958225404
SN - 1386-5056
VL - 88
SP - 44
EP - 51
JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics
JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics
ER -