Balancing Operative Efficiency and Surgical Education: A Functional Neurosurgery Model

Abigail J. Rao, Carli Bullis, Katherine G. Holste, Zoe Teton, Kim J. Burchiel, Ahmed M. Raslan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attending surgeons have dual obligations to deliver high-quality health care and train residents. In modern healthcare, lean principles are increasingly applied to processes preceding and following surgery. However, surgeons have limited data regarding variability and waste during any given operation. OBJECTIVE: To measure variability and waste during the following key functional neurosurgery procedures: retrosigmoid craniectomy (microvascular decompression [MVD] and internal neurolysis) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Additionally, we correlate variability with residents' self-reported readiness for the surgical steps. The aim is to guide surgeons as they balance operative safety and efficiency with training obligations. METHODS: For each operation (retrosigmoid craniectomy and DBS), a standard workflow, segmenting the operation into components, was defined. We observed a representative sample of operations, timing the components, with a focus on variability. To assess perceptions of safety and risk among surgeons of various training levels, a survey was administered. Survey results were correlated with operative variability, attempting to identify areas for increasing value without compromising trainee experience. RESULTS: A sampling of each operation (n = 36) was observed during the study period. For MVD, craniectomy had the highest mean duration and standard deviation, whereas the MVD itself had the lowest mean duration and standard deviation. For DBS, the segments with largest standard deviation in duration were registration and electrode placement. For many steps of both procedures, there was a statistically significant relationship between increasing level of training and increasing perception of safety. CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study introduces an educational and process-improvement tool that can be used to aid surgeons in increasing the efficiency of patient care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)622-631
Number of pages10
JournalOperative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

Fingerprint

Neurosurgery
Microvascular Decompression Surgery
Deep Brain Stimulation
Education
Safety
Workflow
Quality of Health Care
Patient Care
Electrodes
Surgeons
Delivery of Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Comfort
  • Efficiency
  • Lean process
  • Risk
  • Surgical education
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Balancing Operative Efficiency and Surgical Education : A Functional Neurosurgery Model. / Rao, Abigail J.; Bullis, Carli; Holste, Katherine G.; Teton, Zoe; Burchiel, Kim J.; Raslan, Ahmed M.

In: Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.), Vol. 17, No. 6, 01.12.2019, p. 622-631.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rao, Abigail J. ; Bullis, Carli ; Holste, Katherine G. ; Teton, Zoe ; Burchiel, Kim J. ; Raslan, Ahmed M. / Balancing Operative Efficiency and Surgical Education : A Functional Neurosurgery Model. In: Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.). 2019 ; Vol. 17, No. 6. pp. 622-631.
@article{aaa1ec87d39e487e9fe300ea81dded72,
title = "Balancing Operative Efficiency and Surgical Education: A Functional Neurosurgery Model",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Attending surgeons have dual obligations to deliver high-quality health care and train residents. In modern healthcare, lean principles are increasingly applied to processes preceding and following surgery. However, surgeons have limited data regarding variability and waste during any given operation. OBJECTIVE: To measure variability and waste during the following key functional neurosurgery procedures: retrosigmoid craniectomy (microvascular decompression [MVD] and internal neurolysis) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Additionally, we correlate variability with residents' self-reported readiness for the surgical steps. The aim is to guide surgeons as they balance operative safety and efficiency with training obligations. METHODS: For each operation (retrosigmoid craniectomy and DBS), a standard workflow, segmenting the operation into components, was defined. We observed a representative sample of operations, timing the components, with a focus on variability. To assess perceptions of safety and risk among surgeons of various training levels, a survey was administered. Survey results were correlated with operative variability, attempting to identify areas for increasing value without compromising trainee experience. RESULTS: A sampling of each operation (n = 36) was observed during the study period. For MVD, craniectomy had the highest mean duration and standard deviation, whereas the MVD itself had the lowest mean duration and standard deviation. For DBS, the segments with largest standard deviation in duration were registration and electrode placement. For many steps of both procedures, there was a statistically significant relationship between increasing level of training and increasing perception of safety. CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study introduces an educational and process-improvement tool that can be used to aid surgeons in increasing the efficiency of patient care.",
keywords = "Comfort, Efficiency, Lean process, Risk, Surgical education, Survey",
author = "Rao, {Abigail J.} and Carli Bullis and Holste, {Katherine G.} and Zoe Teton and Burchiel, {Kim J.} and Raslan, {Ahmed M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ons/opz048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "622--631",
journal = "Operative Neurosurgery",
issn = "2332-4252",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Balancing Operative Efficiency and Surgical Education

T2 - A Functional Neurosurgery Model

AU - Rao, Abigail J.

AU - Bullis, Carli

AU - Holste, Katherine G.

AU - Teton, Zoe

AU - Burchiel, Kim J.

AU - Raslan, Ahmed M.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Attending surgeons have dual obligations to deliver high-quality health care and train residents. In modern healthcare, lean principles are increasingly applied to processes preceding and following surgery. However, surgeons have limited data regarding variability and waste during any given operation. OBJECTIVE: To measure variability and waste during the following key functional neurosurgery procedures: retrosigmoid craniectomy (microvascular decompression [MVD] and internal neurolysis) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Additionally, we correlate variability with residents' self-reported readiness for the surgical steps. The aim is to guide surgeons as they balance operative safety and efficiency with training obligations. METHODS: For each operation (retrosigmoid craniectomy and DBS), a standard workflow, segmenting the operation into components, was defined. We observed a representative sample of operations, timing the components, with a focus on variability. To assess perceptions of safety and risk among surgeons of various training levels, a survey was administered. Survey results were correlated with operative variability, attempting to identify areas for increasing value without compromising trainee experience. RESULTS: A sampling of each operation (n = 36) was observed during the study period. For MVD, craniectomy had the highest mean duration and standard deviation, whereas the MVD itself had the lowest mean duration and standard deviation. For DBS, the segments with largest standard deviation in duration were registration and electrode placement. For many steps of both procedures, there was a statistically significant relationship between increasing level of training and increasing perception of safety. CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study introduces an educational and process-improvement tool that can be used to aid surgeons in increasing the efficiency of patient care.

AB - BACKGROUND: Attending surgeons have dual obligations to deliver high-quality health care and train residents. In modern healthcare, lean principles are increasingly applied to processes preceding and following surgery. However, surgeons have limited data regarding variability and waste during any given operation. OBJECTIVE: To measure variability and waste during the following key functional neurosurgery procedures: retrosigmoid craniectomy (microvascular decompression [MVD] and internal neurolysis) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Additionally, we correlate variability with residents' self-reported readiness for the surgical steps. The aim is to guide surgeons as they balance operative safety and efficiency with training obligations. METHODS: For each operation (retrosigmoid craniectomy and DBS), a standard workflow, segmenting the operation into components, was defined. We observed a representative sample of operations, timing the components, with a focus on variability. To assess perceptions of safety and risk among surgeons of various training levels, a survey was administered. Survey results were correlated with operative variability, attempting to identify areas for increasing value without compromising trainee experience. RESULTS: A sampling of each operation (n = 36) was observed during the study period. For MVD, craniectomy had the highest mean duration and standard deviation, whereas the MVD itself had the lowest mean duration and standard deviation. For DBS, the segments with largest standard deviation in duration were registration and electrode placement. For many steps of both procedures, there was a statistically significant relationship between increasing level of training and increasing perception of safety. CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study introduces an educational and process-improvement tool that can be used to aid surgeons in increasing the efficiency of patient care.

KW - Comfort

KW - Efficiency

KW - Lean process

KW - Risk

KW - Surgical education

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075109587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075109587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ons/opz048

DO - 10.1093/ons/opz048

M3 - Article

C2 - 30997509

AN - SCOPUS:85075109587

VL - 17

SP - 622

EP - 631

JO - Operative Neurosurgery

JF - Operative Neurosurgery

SN - 2332-4252

IS - 6

ER -