Automated coded ambulatory problem lists: Evaluation of a vocabulary and a data entry tool

Samuel Wang, David W. Bates, Henry C. Chueh, Andrew S. Karson, Saverio M. Maviglia, Julie A. Greim, Jennifer P. Frost, Gilad J. Kuperman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Problem lists are fundamental to electronic medical records (EMRs). However, obtaining an appropriate problem list dictionary is difficult, and getting users to code their problems at the time of data entry can be challenging. Objective: To develop a problem list dictionary and search algorithm for an EMR system and evaluate its use. Methods: We developed a problem list dictionary and lookup tool and implemented it in several EMR systems. A sample of 10,000 problem entries was reviewed from each system to assess overall coding rates. We also performed a manual review of a subset of entries to determine the appropriateness of coded entries, and to assess the reasons other entries were left uncoded. Results: The overall coding rate varied significantly between different EMR implementations (63-79%). Coded entries were virtually always appropriate (99%). The most frequent reasons for uncoded entries were due to user interface failures (44-45%), insufficient dictionary coverage (20-32%), and non-problem entries (10-12%). Conclusion: The problem list dictionary and search algorithm has achieved a good coding rate, but the rate is dependent on the specific user interface implementation. Problem coding is essential for providing clinical decision support, and improving usability should result in better coding rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-28
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume72
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vocabulary
Electronic Health Records
Clinical Decision Support Systems

Keywords

  • Medical record systems, computerized
  • Medical records, problem-orientated
  • Vocabulary, controlled

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Wang, S., Bates, D. W., Chueh, H. C., Karson, A. S., Maviglia, S. M., Greim, J. A., ... Kuperman, G. J. (2003). Automated coded ambulatory problem lists: Evaluation of a vocabulary and a data entry tool. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 72(1-3), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.08.002

Automated coded ambulatory problem lists : Evaluation of a vocabulary and a data entry tool. / Wang, Samuel; Bates, David W.; Chueh, Henry C.; Karson, Andrew S.; Maviglia, Saverio M.; Greim, Julie A.; Frost, Jennifer P.; Kuperman, Gilad J.

In: International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 72, No. 1-3, 12.2003, p. 17-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wang, S, Bates, DW, Chueh, HC, Karson, AS, Maviglia, SM, Greim, JA, Frost, JP & Kuperman, GJ 2003, 'Automated coded ambulatory problem lists: Evaluation of a vocabulary and a data entry tool', International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 72, no. 1-3, pp. 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.08.002
Wang, Samuel ; Bates, David W. ; Chueh, Henry C. ; Karson, Andrew S. ; Maviglia, Saverio M. ; Greim, Julie A. ; Frost, Jennifer P. ; Kuperman, Gilad J. / Automated coded ambulatory problem lists : Evaluation of a vocabulary and a data entry tool. In: International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2003 ; Vol. 72, No. 1-3. pp. 17-28.
@article{bddd91d8d55d43b48955d53a6d1a6688,
title = "Automated coded ambulatory problem lists: Evaluation of a vocabulary and a data entry tool",
abstract = "Background: Problem lists are fundamental to electronic medical records (EMRs). However, obtaining an appropriate problem list dictionary is difficult, and getting users to code their problems at the time of data entry can be challenging. Objective: To develop a problem list dictionary and search algorithm for an EMR system and evaluate its use. Methods: We developed a problem list dictionary and lookup tool and implemented it in several EMR systems. A sample of 10,000 problem entries was reviewed from each system to assess overall coding rates. We also performed a manual review of a subset of entries to determine the appropriateness of coded entries, and to assess the reasons other entries were left uncoded. Results: The overall coding rate varied significantly between different EMR implementations (63-79{\%}). Coded entries were virtually always appropriate (99{\%}). The most frequent reasons for uncoded entries were due to user interface failures (44-45{\%}), insufficient dictionary coverage (20-32{\%}), and non-problem entries (10-12{\%}). Conclusion: The problem list dictionary and search algorithm has achieved a good coding rate, but the rate is dependent on the specific user interface implementation. Problem coding is essential for providing clinical decision support, and improving usability should result in better coding rates.",
keywords = "Medical record systems, computerized, Medical records, problem-orientated, Vocabulary, controlled",
author = "Samuel Wang and Bates, {David W.} and Chueh, {Henry C.} and Karson, {Andrew S.} and Maviglia, {Saverio M.} and Greim, {Julie A.} and Frost, {Jennifer P.} and Kuperman, {Gilad J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.08.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "17--28",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Informatics",
issn = "1386-5056",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automated coded ambulatory problem lists

T2 - Evaluation of a vocabulary and a data entry tool

AU - Wang, Samuel

AU - Bates, David W.

AU - Chueh, Henry C.

AU - Karson, Andrew S.

AU - Maviglia, Saverio M.

AU - Greim, Julie A.

AU - Frost, Jennifer P.

AU - Kuperman, Gilad J.

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - Background: Problem lists are fundamental to electronic medical records (EMRs). However, obtaining an appropriate problem list dictionary is difficult, and getting users to code their problems at the time of data entry can be challenging. Objective: To develop a problem list dictionary and search algorithm for an EMR system and evaluate its use. Methods: We developed a problem list dictionary and lookup tool and implemented it in several EMR systems. A sample of 10,000 problem entries was reviewed from each system to assess overall coding rates. We also performed a manual review of a subset of entries to determine the appropriateness of coded entries, and to assess the reasons other entries were left uncoded. Results: The overall coding rate varied significantly between different EMR implementations (63-79%). Coded entries were virtually always appropriate (99%). The most frequent reasons for uncoded entries were due to user interface failures (44-45%), insufficient dictionary coverage (20-32%), and non-problem entries (10-12%). Conclusion: The problem list dictionary and search algorithm has achieved a good coding rate, but the rate is dependent on the specific user interface implementation. Problem coding is essential for providing clinical decision support, and improving usability should result in better coding rates.

AB - Background: Problem lists are fundamental to electronic medical records (EMRs). However, obtaining an appropriate problem list dictionary is difficult, and getting users to code their problems at the time of data entry can be challenging. Objective: To develop a problem list dictionary and search algorithm for an EMR system and evaluate its use. Methods: We developed a problem list dictionary and lookup tool and implemented it in several EMR systems. A sample of 10,000 problem entries was reviewed from each system to assess overall coding rates. We also performed a manual review of a subset of entries to determine the appropriateness of coded entries, and to assess the reasons other entries were left uncoded. Results: The overall coding rate varied significantly between different EMR implementations (63-79%). Coded entries were virtually always appropriate (99%). The most frequent reasons for uncoded entries were due to user interface failures (44-45%), insufficient dictionary coverage (20-32%), and non-problem entries (10-12%). Conclusion: The problem list dictionary and search algorithm has achieved a good coding rate, but the rate is dependent on the specific user interface implementation. Problem coding is essential for providing clinical decision support, and improving usability should result in better coding rates.

KW - Medical record systems, computerized

KW - Medical records, problem-orientated

KW - Vocabulary, controlled

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345256640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345256640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.08.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 14644303

AN - SCOPUS:0345256640

VL - 72

SP - 17

EP - 28

JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics

JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics

SN - 1386-5056

IS - 1-3

ER -