Authorship Inflation in Medical Publications

Gaurie Tilak, Vinay Prasad, Anupam B. Jena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The number of authors per manuscript in peer-reviewed medical journals has increased substantially in the last several decades. Several reasons have been offered to explain this authorship growth, including increased researcher collaboration, honorary authorship driven by increased pressures for funding and promotion, the belief that including senior authors will facilitate publication, and the growing complexity of medical research. It is unknown, however, whether authorship has grown over time due to growing complexity of published academic articles, in which case growth could be warranted, or whether it has grown due to pressures of funding and academic promotion, which have created "authorship inflation." To answer this question, we analyzed data on authorship count, study type, and size of study population for the first 50 original articles published in each decade during 1960-2010 in 3 major medical journals. Within each type of study we considered (eg, randomized trials, observational studies, etc), average authorship rose more than 3-fold during this period. Similar growth persisted after adjustment for changes in study population sizes over time. Our findings suggest that increasing research complexity is an inadequate explanation for authorship growth. Instead, growth in authorship appears inflationary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInquiry
Volume52
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Authorship
Economic Inflation
Publications
Growth
Population Density
Pressure
Manuscripts
Observational Studies
Biomedical Research
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • authorship criteria

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Authorship Inflation in Medical Publications. / Tilak, Gaurie; Prasad, Vinay; Jena, Anupam B.

In: Inquiry, Vol. 52, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tilak, Gaurie ; Prasad, Vinay ; Jena, Anupam B. / Authorship Inflation in Medical Publications. In: Inquiry. 2015 ; Vol. 52.
@article{96cf4b4843bd4e83aa8b408f55ba2bdc,
title = "Authorship Inflation in Medical Publications",
abstract = "The number of authors per manuscript in peer-reviewed medical journals has increased substantially in the last several decades. Several reasons have been offered to explain this authorship growth, including increased researcher collaboration, honorary authorship driven by increased pressures for funding and promotion, the belief that including senior authors will facilitate publication, and the growing complexity of medical research. It is unknown, however, whether authorship has grown over time due to growing complexity of published academic articles, in which case growth could be warranted, or whether it has grown due to pressures of funding and academic promotion, which have created {"}authorship inflation.{"} To answer this question, we analyzed data on authorship count, study type, and size of study population for the first 50 original articles published in each decade during 1960-2010 in 3 major medical journals. Within each type of study we considered (eg, randomized trials, observational studies, etc), average authorship rose more than 3-fold during this period. Similar growth persisted after adjustment for changes in study population sizes over time. Our findings suggest that increasing research complexity is an inadequate explanation for authorship growth. Instead, growth in authorship appears inflationary.",
keywords = "authorship criteria",
author = "Gaurie Tilak and Vinay Prasad and Jena, {Anupam B.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/0046958015598311",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
journal = "Inquiry",
issn = "0046-9580",
publisher = "Excellus Health Plan",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authorship Inflation in Medical Publications

AU - Tilak, Gaurie

AU - Prasad, Vinay

AU - Jena, Anupam B.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The number of authors per manuscript in peer-reviewed medical journals has increased substantially in the last several decades. Several reasons have been offered to explain this authorship growth, including increased researcher collaboration, honorary authorship driven by increased pressures for funding and promotion, the belief that including senior authors will facilitate publication, and the growing complexity of medical research. It is unknown, however, whether authorship has grown over time due to growing complexity of published academic articles, in which case growth could be warranted, or whether it has grown due to pressures of funding and academic promotion, which have created "authorship inflation." To answer this question, we analyzed data on authorship count, study type, and size of study population for the first 50 original articles published in each decade during 1960-2010 in 3 major medical journals. Within each type of study we considered (eg, randomized trials, observational studies, etc), average authorship rose more than 3-fold during this period. Similar growth persisted after adjustment for changes in study population sizes over time. Our findings suggest that increasing research complexity is an inadequate explanation for authorship growth. Instead, growth in authorship appears inflationary.

AB - The number of authors per manuscript in peer-reviewed medical journals has increased substantially in the last several decades. Several reasons have been offered to explain this authorship growth, including increased researcher collaboration, honorary authorship driven by increased pressures for funding and promotion, the belief that including senior authors will facilitate publication, and the growing complexity of medical research. It is unknown, however, whether authorship has grown over time due to growing complexity of published academic articles, in which case growth could be warranted, or whether it has grown due to pressures of funding and academic promotion, which have created "authorship inflation." To answer this question, we analyzed data on authorship count, study type, and size of study population for the first 50 original articles published in each decade during 1960-2010 in 3 major medical journals. Within each type of study we considered (eg, randomized trials, observational studies, etc), average authorship rose more than 3-fold during this period. Similar growth persisted after adjustment for changes in study population sizes over time. Our findings suggest that increasing research complexity is an inadequate explanation for authorship growth. Instead, growth in authorship appears inflationary.

KW - authorship criteria

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85003046855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85003046855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0046958015598311

DO - 10.1177/0046958015598311

M3 - Article

VL - 52

JO - Inquiry

JF - Inquiry

SN - 0046-9580

ER -