Attitudes toward cost-conscious care among U.S. physicians and medical students: analysis of national cross-sectional survey data by age and stage of training

Andrea N. Leep Hunderfund, Liselotte N. Dyrbye, Stephanie R. Starr, Jay Mandrekar, Jon C. Tilburt, Paul George, Elizabeth G. Baxley, Jed D. Gonzalo, Christopher Moriates, Susan D. Goold, Patricia A. Carney, Bonnie M. Miller, Sara J. Grethlein, Tonya L. Fancher, Matthew K. Wynia, Darcy A. Reed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The success of initiatives intended to increase the value of health care depends, in part, on the degree to which cost-conscious care is endorsed by current and future physicians. This study aimed to first analyze attitudes of U.S. physicians by age and then compare the attitudes of physicians and medical students. METHODS: A paper survey was mailed in mid-2012 to 3897 practicing physicians randomly selected from the American Medical Association Masterfile. An electronic survey was sent in early 2015 to all 5,992 students at 10 U.S. medical schools. Survey items measured attitudes toward cost-conscious care and perceived responsibility for reducing healthcare costs. Physician responses were first compared across age groups (30-40 years, 41-50 years, 51-60 years, and > 60 years) and then compared to student responses using Chi square tests and logistic regression analyses (controlling for sex). RESULTS: A total of 2,556 physicians (65%) and 3395 students (57%) responded. Physician attitudes generally did not differ by age, but differed significantly from those of students. Specifically, students were more likely than physicians to agree that cost to society should be important in treatment decisions (p < 0.001) and that physicians should sometimes deny beneficial but costly services (p < 0.001). Students were less likely to agree that it is unfair to ask physicians to be cost-conscious while prioritizing patient welfare (p < 0.001). Compared to physicians, students assigned more responsibility for reducing healthcare costs to hospitals and health systems (p < 0.001) and less responsibility to lawyers (p < 0.001) and patients (p < 0.001). Nearly all significant differences persisted after controlling for sex and when only the youngest physicians were compared to students. CONCLUSIONS: Physician attitudes toward cost-conscious care are similar across age groups. However, physician attitudes differ significantly from medical students, even among the youngest physicians most proximate to students in age. Medical student responses suggest they are more accepting of cost-conscious care than physicians and attribute more responsibility for reducing costs to organizations and systems rather than individuals. This may be due to the combined effects of generational differences, new medical school curricula, students' relative inexperience providing cost-conscious care within complex healthcare systems, and the rapidly evolving U.S. healthcare system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number275
Pages (from-to)275
Number of pages1
JournalBMC medical education
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 22 2018

Keywords

  • Cohort effect
  • Cost-conscious care
  • Generational differences
  • Health care costs
  • Healthcare costs
  • High value care
  • High value cost-conscious care
  • National survey
  • Undergraduate medical education
  • Value-based health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Attitudes toward cost-conscious care among U.S. physicians and medical students: analysis of national cross-sectional survey data by age and stage of training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Leep Hunderfund, A. N., Dyrbye, L. N., Starr, S. R., Mandrekar, J., Tilburt, J. C., George, P., Baxley, E. G., Gonzalo, J. D., Moriates, C., Goold, S. D., Carney, P. A., Miller, B. M., Grethlein, S. J., Fancher, T. L., Wynia, M. K., & Reed, D. A. (2018). Attitudes toward cost-conscious care among U.S. physicians and medical students: analysis of national cross-sectional survey data by age and stage of training. BMC medical education, 18(1), 275. [275]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1388-7