Attention to the principles of exercise training in exercise studies on prostate cancer survivors

a systematic review

Sarah E. Neil-Sztramko, Mary E. Medysky, Kristin L. Campbell, Kelcey A. Bland, Kerri Winters-Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this review is to update previously published reviews on exercise programming in exercise trials in prostate cancer survivors. We evaluated: 1) the application of the principles of exercise training in prescribed programs; 2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and 3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed programs. Methods: Building upon a previous review, a systematic review was conducted searching OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases from 2012-2017. Randomized controlled trials of at least four weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in men diagnosed with prostate cancer that reported physical fitness outcomes, including body composition were eligible for inclusion. Results: Specificity was appropriately applied by 93%, progression by 55%, overload by 48%, initial values by 55%, and diminishing returns by 28% of eligible studies. No study adequately applied the principle of reversibility. Most (79%) studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the study methods, but no study reported all components of adherence to the prescribed intervention in the study results. Conclusions: Application of standard exercise training principles is inadequate in exercise trials in men with prostate cancer and could possibly lead to an inadequate exercise stimulus. While many studies report the basic components of the exercise prescription in their study methods, full reporting of actual exercise completed is needed to advance our understanding of the optimal exercise dose for men with prostate cancer and promote translation of controlled trials to practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number321
JournalBMC cancer
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 5 2019

Fingerprint

Survivors
Prostatic Neoplasms
Exercise
Prescriptions
Physical Fitness
Body Composition
Randomized Controlled Trials
Databases

Keywords

  • Exercise
  • Exercise prescription
  • Prostate cancer
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Attention to the principles of exercise training in exercise studies on prostate cancer survivors : a systematic review. / Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E.; Medysky, Mary E.; Campbell, Kristin L.; Bland, Kelcey A.; Winters-Stone, Kerri.

In: BMC cancer, Vol. 19, No. 1, 321, 05.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E. ; Medysky, Mary E. ; Campbell, Kristin L. ; Bland, Kelcey A. ; Winters-Stone, Kerri. / Attention to the principles of exercise training in exercise studies on prostate cancer survivors : a systematic review. In: BMC cancer. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 1.
@article{5bb5fcc0a1d6409593b80efa65c984be,
title = "Attention to the principles of exercise training in exercise studies on prostate cancer survivors: a systematic review",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this review is to update previously published reviews on exercise programming in exercise trials in prostate cancer survivors. We evaluated: 1) the application of the principles of exercise training in prescribed programs; 2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and 3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed programs. Methods: Building upon a previous review, a systematic review was conducted searching OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases from 2012-2017. Randomized controlled trials of at least four weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in men diagnosed with prostate cancer that reported physical fitness outcomes, including body composition were eligible for inclusion. Results: Specificity was appropriately applied by 93{\%}, progression by 55{\%}, overload by 48{\%}, initial values by 55{\%}, and diminishing returns by 28{\%} of eligible studies. No study adequately applied the principle of reversibility. Most (79{\%}) studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the study methods, but no study reported all components of adherence to the prescribed intervention in the study results. Conclusions: Application of standard exercise training principles is inadequate in exercise trials in men with prostate cancer and could possibly lead to an inadequate exercise stimulus. While many studies report the basic components of the exercise prescription in their study methods, full reporting of actual exercise completed is needed to advance our understanding of the optimal exercise dose for men with prostate cancer and promote translation of controlled trials to practice.",
keywords = "Exercise, Exercise prescription, Prostate cancer, Systematic review",
author = "Neil-Sztramko, {Sarah E.} and Medysky, {Mary E.} and Campbell, {Kristin L.} and Bland, {Kelcey A.} and Kerri Winters-Stone",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1186/s12885-019-5520-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "BMC Cancer",
issn = "1471-2407",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attention to the principles of exercise training in exercise studies on prostate cancer survivors

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E.

AU - Medysky, Mary E.

AU - Campbell, Kristin L.

AU - Bland, Kelcey A.

AU - Winters-Stone, Kerri

PY - 2019/4/5

Y1 - 2019/4/5

N2 - Background: The purpose of this review is to update previously published reviews on exercise programming in exercise trials in prostate cancer survivors. We evaluated: 1) the application of the principles of exercise training in prescribed programs; 2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and 3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed programs. Methods: Building upon a previous review, a systematic review was conducted searching OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases from 2012-2017. Randomized controlled trials of at least four weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in men diagnosed with prostate cancer that reported physical fitness outcomes, including body composition were eligible for inclusion. Results: Specificity was appropriately applied by 93%, progression by 55%, overload by 48%, initial values by 55%, and diminishing returns by 28% of eligible studies. No study adequately applied the principle of reversibility. Most (79%) studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the study methods, but no study reported all components of adherence to the prescribed intervention in the study results. Conclusions: Application of standard exercise training principles is inadequate in exercise trials in men with prostate cancer and could possibly lead to an inadequate exercise stimulus. While many studies report the basic components of the exercise prescription in their study methods, full reporting of actual exercise completed is needed to advance our understanding of the optimal exercise dose for men with prostate cancer and promote translation of controlled trials to practice.

AB - Background: The purpose of this review is to update previously published reviews on exercise programming in exercise trials in prostate cancer survivors. We evaluated: 1) the application of the principles of exercise training in prescribed programs; 2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and 3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed programs. Methods: Building upon a previous review, a systematic review was conducted searching OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases from 2012-2017. Randomized controlled trials of at least four weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in men diagnosed with prostate cancer that reported physical fitness outcomes, including body composition were eligible for inclusion. Results: Specificity was appropriately applied by 93%, progression by 55%, overload by 48%, initial values by 55%, and diminishing returns by 28% of eligible studies. No study adequately applied the principle of reversibility. Most (79%) studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the study methods, but no study reported all components of adherence to the prescribed intervention in the study results. Conclusions: Application of standard exercise training principles is inadequate in exercise trials in men with prostate cancer and could possibly lead to an inadequate exercise stimulus. While many studies report the basic components of the exercise prescription in their study methods, full reporting of actual exercise completed is needed to advance our understanding of the optimal exercise dose for men with prostate cancer and promote translation of controlled trials to practice.

KW - Exercise

KW - Exercise prescription

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063940003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063940003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12885-019-5520-9

DO - 10.1186/s12885-019-5520-9

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - BMC Cancer

JF - BMC Cancer

SN - 1471-2407

IS - 1

M1 - 321

ER -