Attention to principles of exercise training: A review of exercise studies for survivors of cancers other than breast

Kerri Winters-Stone, Sarah E. Neil, Kristin L. Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can evaluate how well a particular exercise programme reduces cancer treatment-related side effects. Adequate design and reporting of the exercise prescription employed in RCTs is central to interpreting study findings and translating effective interventions into practice. Our previous review on the quality and reporting of exercise prescriptions in RCTs in breast cancer survivors revealed several inadequacies. This review similarly evaluates exercise prescriptions used in RCTs in patients with cancers other than the breast. Methods: The literature was searched for RCTs in persons diagnosed with a cancer other than breast. Data were extracted to evaluate the attention to the principles of exercise training in the study design and the reporting of and adherence to the exercise prescription used for the intervention. Results: Of the 33 studies reviewed, none attended to all of the exercise training principles. Specificity was applied by 89%, progression by 26%, overload by 37%, initial values by 26%, diminishing returns by 9% and reversibility by 3%. Only 2 of 33 studies (6%) reported both the exercise prescription in full and adherence to each individual component of the prescription. Conclusions: Application of the principles of training in exercise RCTs of non-breast cancer survivors was incomplete and inconsistent. Given these observations, interpretation of findings from the reviewed studies should consider potential shortcomings in intervention design. Though the prescribed exercise programme was often described, adherence to the entire prescription was rarely reported providing a less accurate picture of dose-response and challenges in translating programmes to community settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)987-995
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume48
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Survivors
Exercise
Breast Neoplasms
Prescriptions
Randomized Controlled Trials
Second Primary Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Attention to principles of exercise training : A review of exercise studies for survivors of cancers other than breast. / Winters-Stone, Kerri; Neil, Sarah E.; Campbell, Kristin L.

In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 48, No. 12, 2014, p. 987-995.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9ea6801e944472da0ed7b5384d6d40e,
title = "Attention to principles of exercise training: A review of exercise studies for survivors of cancers other than breast",
abstract = "Objectives: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can evaluate how well a particular exercise programme reduces cancer treatment-related side effects. Adequate design and reporting of the exercise prescription employed in RCTs is central to interpreting study findings and translating effective interventions into practice. Our previous review on the quality and reporting of exercise prescriptions in RCTs in breast cancer survivors revealed several inadequacies. This review similarly evaluates exercise prescriptions used in RCTs in patients with cancers other than the breast. Methods: The literature was searched for RCTs in persons diagnosed with a cancer other than breast. Data were extracted to evaluate the attention to the principles of exercise training in the study design and the reporting of and adherence to the exercise prescription used for the intervention. Results: Of the 33 studies reviewed, none attended to all of the exercise training principles. Specificity was applied by 89{\%}, progression by 26{\%}, overload by 37{\%}, initial values by 26{\%}, diminishing returns by 9{\%} and reversibility by 3{\%}. Only 2 of 33 studies (6{\%}) reported both the exercise prescription in full and adherence to each individual component of the prescription. Conclusions: Application of the principles of training in exercise RCTs of non-breast cancer survivors was incomplete and inconsistent. Given these observations, interpretation of findings from the reviewed studies should consider potential shortcomings in intervention design. Though the prescribed exercise programme was often described, adherence to the entire prescription was rarely reported providing a less accurate picture of dose-response and challenges in translating programmes to community settings.",
author = "Kerri Winters-Stone and Neil, {Sarah E.} and Campbell, {Kristin L.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1136/bjsports-2012-091732",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "987--995",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attention to principles of exercise training

T2 - A review of exercise studies for survivors of cancers other than breast

AU - Winters-Stone, Kerri

AU - Neil, Sarah E.

AU - Campbell, Kristin L.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can evaluate how well a particular exercise programme reduces cancer treatment-related side effects. Adequate design and reporting of the exercise prescription employed in RCTs is central to interpreting study findings and translating effective interventions into practice. Our previous review on the quality and reporting of exercise prescriptions in RCTs in breast cancer survivors revealed several inadequacies. This review similarly evaluates exercise prescriptions used in RCTs in patients with cancers other than the breast. Methods: The literature was searched for RCTs in persons diagnosed with a cancer other than breast. Data were extracted to evaluate the attention to the principles of exercise training in the study design and the reporting of and adherence to the exercise prescription used for the intervention. Results: Of the 33 studies reviewed, none attended to all of the exercise training principles. Specificity was applied by 89%, progression by 26%, overload by 37%, initial values by 26%, diminishing returns by 9% and reversibility by 3%. Only 2 of 33 studies (6%) reported both the exercise prescription in full and adherence to each individual component of the prescription. Conclusions: Application of the principles of training in exercise RCTs of non-breast cancer survivors was incomplete and inconsistent. Given these observations, interpretation of findings from the reviewed studies should consider potential shortcomings in intervention design. Though the prescribed exercise programme was often described, adherence to the entire prescription was rarely reported providing a less accurate picture of dose-response and challenges in translating programmes to community settings.

AB - Objectives: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can evaluate how well a particular exercise programme reduces cancer treatment-related side effects. Adequate design and reporting of the exercise prescription employed in RCTs is central to interpreting study findings and translating effective interventions into practice. Our previous review on the quality and reporting of exercise prescriptions in RCTs in breast cancer survivors revealed several inadequacies. This review similarly evaluates exercise prescriptions used in RCTs in patients with cancers other than the breast. Methods: The literature was searched for RCTs in persons diagnosed with a cancer other than breast. Data were extracted to evaluate the attention to the principles of exercise training in the study design and the reporting of and adherence to the exercise prescription used for the intervention. Results: Of the 33 studies reviewed, none attended to all of the exercise training principles. Specificity was applied by 89%, progression by 26%, overload by 37%, initial values by 26%, diminishing returns by 9% and reversibility by 3%. Only 2 of 33 studies (6%) reported both the exercise prescription in full and adherence to each individual component of the prescription. Conclusions: Application of the principles of training in exercise RCTs of non-breast cancer survivors was incomplete and inconsistent. Given these observations, interpretation of findings from the reviewed studies should consider potential shortcomings in intervention design. Though the prescribed exercise programme was often described, adherence to the entire prescription was rarely reported providing a less accurate picture of dose-response and challenges in translating programmes to community settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901595431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901595431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091732

DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091732

M3 - Article

C2 - 23293010

AN - SCOPUS:84901595431

VL - 48

SP - 987

EP - 995

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

IS - 12

ER -