Association of the presence of trainees with outpatient appointment times in an ophthalmology clinic

Isaac H. Goldstein, Michelle R. Hribar, Sarah Read-Brown, Michael F. Chiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Physicians face pressure to improve clinical efficiency, particularly with electronic health record (EHR) adoption and gradual shifts toward value-based reimbursement models. These pressures are especially pronounced in academic medical centers, where delivery of care must be balanced with medical education. However, the association of the presence of trainees with clinical efficiency in outpatient ophthalmology clinics is not known. OBJECTIVE To quantify the association of the presence of trainees (residents and fellows) and efficiency in an outpatient ophthalmology clinic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-center cohort studywas conducted from January 1 through December 31, 2014, at an academic department of ophthalmology. Participants included 49 448 patient appointments with 33 attending physicians and 40 trainees. EXPOSURES Presence vs absence of trainees in an appointment or clinic session, as determined by review of the EHR audit log. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patient appointment time, as determined by time stamps in the EHR clinical data warehouse. Linear mixed models were developed to analyze variability among clinicians and patients. RESULTS Among the 33 study physicians (13 women [39%] and 20 men [61%]; median age, 44 years [interquartile range, 39-53 years]), appointments with trainees were significantly longer than appointments in clinic sessions without trainees (mean [SD], 105.0 [55.7] vs 80.3 [45.4] minutes; P < .001). The presence of a trainee in a clinic session was associated with longer mean appointment time, even in appointments for which the trainee was not present (mean [SD], 87.2 [49.2] vs 80.3 [45.4] minutes; P < .001). Among 33 study physicians, 3 (9%) had shorter mean appointment times when a trainee was present, 1 (3%) had no change, and 29 (88%) had longer mean appointment times when a trainee was present. Linear mixed models showed the presence of a resident was associated with a lengthening of appointment time of 17.0 minutes (95%CI, 15.6-18.5 minutes; P < .001), and the presence of a fellow was associated with a lengthening of appointment time of 13.5 minutes (95%CI, 12.3-14.8 minutes; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Presence of trainees was associated with longer appointment times, even for patients not seen by a trainee. Although numerous limitations to this study design might affect the interpretation of the findings, these results highlight a potential challenge of maintaining clinical efficiency in academic medical centers and raise questions about physician reimbursement models.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages20-26
Number of pages7
JournalJAMA Ophthalmology
Volume136
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Ophthalmology
Appointments and Schedules
Outpatients
Electronic Health Records
Physicians
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Linear Models
Women Physicians
Pressure
Medical Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Association of the presence of trainees with outpatient appointment times in an ophthalmology clinic. / Goldstein, Isaac H.; Hribar, Michelle R.; Read-Brown, Sarah; Chiang, Michael F.

In: JAMA Ophthalmology, Vol. 136, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 20-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0aa39136399c4cd18d9ea4ca041a0b19,
title = "Association of the presence of trainees with outpatient appointment times in an ophthalmology clinic",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE Physicians face pressure to improve clinical efficiency, particularly with electronic health record (EHR) adoption and gradual shifts toward value-based reimbursement models. These pressures are especially pronounced in academic medical centers, where delivery of care must be balanced with medical education. However, the association of the presence of trainees with clinical efficiency in outpatient ophthalmology clinics is not known. OBJECTIVE To quantify the association of the presence of trainees (residents and fellows) and efficiency in an outpatient ophthalmology clinic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-center cohort studywas conducted from January 1 through December 31, 2014, at an academic department of ophthalmology. Participants included 49 448 patient appointments with 33 attending physicians and 40 trainees. EXPOSURES Presence vs absence of trainees in an appointment or clinic session, as determined by review of the EHR audit log. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patient appointment time, as determined by time stamps in the EHR clinical data warehouse. Linear mixed models were developed to analyze variability among clinicians and patients. RESULTS Among the 33 study physicians (13 women [39{\%}] and 20 men [61{\%}]; median age, 44 years [interquartile range, 39-53 years]), appointments with trainees were significantly longer than appointments in clinic sessions without trainees (mean [SD], 105.0 [55.7] vs 80.3 [45.4] minutes; P < .001). The presence of a trainee in a clinic session was associated with longer mean appointment time, even in appointments for which the trainee was not present (mean [SD], 87.2 [49.2] vs 80.3 [45.4] minutes; P < .001). Among 33 study physicians, 3 (9{\%}) had shorter mean appointment times when a trainee was present, 1 (3{\%}) had no change, and 29 (88{\%}) had longer mean appointment times when a trainee was present. Linear mixed models showed the presence of a resident was associated with a lengthening of appointment time of 17.0 minutes (95{\%}CI, 15.6-18.5 minutes; P < .001), and the presence of a fellow was associated with a lengthening of appointment time of 13.5 minutes (95{\%}CI, 12.3-14.8 minutes; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Presence of trainees was associated with longer appointment times, even for patients not seen by a trainee. Although numerous limitations to this study design might affect the interpretation of the findings, these results highlight a potential challenge of maintaining clinical efficiency in academic medical centers and raise questions about physician reimbursement models.",
author = "Goldstein, {Isaac H.} and Hribar, {Michelle R.} and Sarah Read-Brown and Chiang, {Michael F.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4816",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "20--26",
journal = "JAMA Ophthalmology",
issn = "2168-6165",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of the presence of trainees with outpatient appointment times in an ophthalmology clinic

AU - Goldstein,Isaac H.

AU - Hribar,Michelle R.

AU - Read-Brown,Sarah

AU - Chiang,Michael F.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE Physicians face pressure to improve clinical efficiency, particularly with electronic health record (EHR) adoption and gradual shifts toward value-based reimbursement models. These pressures are especially pronounced in academic medical centers, where delivery of care must be balanced with medical education. However, the association of the presence of trainees with clinical efficiency in outpatient ophthalmology clinics is not known. OBJECTIVE To quantify the association of the presence of trainees (residents and fellows) and efficiency in an outpatient ophthalmology clinic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-center cohort studywas conducted from January 1 through December 31, 2014, at an academic department of ophthalmology. Participants included 49 448 patient appointments with 33 attending physicians and 40 trainees. EXPOSURES Presence vs absence of trainees in an appointment or clinic session, as determined by review of the EHR audit log. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patient appointment time, as determined by time stamps in the EHR clinical data warehouse. Linear mixed models were developed to analyze variability among clinicians and patients. RESULTS Among the 33 study physicians (13 women [39%] and 20 men [61%]; median age, 44 years [interquartile range, 39-53 years]), appointments with trainees were significantly longer than appointments in clinic sessions without trainees (mean [SD], 105.0 [55.7] vs 80.3 [45.4] minutes; P < .001). The presence of a trainee in a clinic session was associated with longer mean appointment time, even in appointments for which the trainee was not present (mean [SD], 87.2 [49.2] vs 80.3 [45.4] minutes; P < .001). Among 33 study physicians, 3 (9%) had shorter mean appointment times when a trainee was present, 1 (3%) had no change, and 29 (88%) had longer mean appointment times when a trainee was present. Linear mixed models showed the presence of a resident was associated with a lengthening of appointment time of 17.0 minutes (95%CI, 15.6-18.5 minutes; P < .001), and the presence of a fellow was associated with a lengthening of appointment time of 13.5 minutes (95%CI, 12.3-14.8 minutes; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Presence of trainees was associated with longer appointment times, even for patients not seen by a trainee. Although numerous limitations to this study design might affect the interpretation of the findings, these results highlight a potential challenge of maintaining clinical efficiency in academic medical centers and raise questions about physician reimbursement models.

AB - IMPORTANCE Physicians face pressure to improve clinical efficiency, particularly with electronic health record (EHR) adoption and gradual shifts toward value-based reimbursement models. These pressures are especially pronounced in academic medical centers, where delivery of care must be balanced with medical education. However, the association of the presence of trainees with clinical efficiency in outpatient ophthalmology clinics is not known. OBJECTIVE To quantify the association of the presence of trainees (residents and fellows) and efficiency in an outpatient ophthalmology clinic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-center cohort studywas conducted from January 1 through December 31, 2014, at an academic department of ophthalmology. Participants included 49 448 patient appointments with 33 attending physicians and 40 trainees. EXPOSURES Presence vs absence of trainees in an appointment or clinic session, as determined by review of the EHR audit log. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patient appointment time, as determined by time stamps in the EHR clinical data warehouse. Linear mixed models were developed to analyze variability among clinicians and patients. RESULTS Among the 33 study physicians (13 women [39%] and 20 men [61%]; median age, 44 years [interquartile range, 39-53 years]), appointments with trainees were significantly longer than appointments in clinic sessions without trainees (mean [SD], 105.0 [55.7] vs 80.3 [45.4] minutes; P < .001). The presence of a trainee in a clinic session was associated with longer mean appointment time, even in appointments for which the trainee was not present (mean [SD], 87.2 [49.2] vs 80.3 [45.4] minutes; P < .001). Among 33 study physicians, 3 (9%) had shorter mean appointment times when a trainee was present, 1 (3%) had no change, and 29 (88%) had longer mean appointment times when a trainee was present. Linear mixed models showed the presence of a resident was associated with a lengthening of appointment time of 17.0 minutes (95%CI, 15.6-18.5 minutes; P < .001), and the presence of a fellow was associated with a lengthening of appointment time of 13.5 minutes (95%CI, 12.3-14.8 minutes; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Presence of trainees was associated with longer appointment times, even for patients not seen by a trainee. Although numerous limitations to this study design might affect the interpretation of the findings, these results highlight a potential challenge of maintaining clinical efficiency in academic medical centers and raise questions about physician reimbursement models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041114871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041114871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4816

DO - 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4816

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 20

EP - 26

JO - JAMA Ophthalmology

T2 - JAMA Ophthalmology

JF - JAMA Ophthalmology

SN - 2168-6165

IS - 1

ER -