Association of a health care provider review meeting with cesarean delivery rates

A quality improvement program

Ashley E. Skeith, Amy M. Valent, Nicole Marshall, Leonardo Pereira, Aaron Caughey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of a quality improvement effort that was mediated through weekly review of all criteria for cesarean delivery on cesarean delivery prevalence and indications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a natural experiment model that compared two timeframes, from 2009 to 2013, at a single institution. We introduced a weekly retrospective review conference to discuss all cesarean deliveries in 2010 that continued over time. The conferences were attended by obstetric care providers, anesthesiology, and labor and delivery nurses. Date of delivery was dichotomized by those delivering before July 1, 2010, and those delivering after. We included women with term singleton vertex gestations in our study population and then examined the rates of cesarean delivery by date of delivery. We then examined indications for the cesarean deliveries during the study period based on surgeon documentation. x2 tests were used for statistical comparisons and a P value of ,.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: There were 5,541 term singleton cephalic births during the study period. The rate of cesarean delivery declined significantly after our intervention in all women (22.2% vs 27.4%, P,.001) and nulliparous women (23.3% vs 30.9%, P,.001). The adjusted odds ratio of cesarean delivery in all women as related to time cohort is 0.68 (95% CI 0.58-0.79) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.44-0.70) in nulliparous women. We examined indications for the 1,315 cesarean deliveries during the study period by date of delivery. The indications of active-phase arrest, second-stage arrest, failed induction, repeat cesarean delivery, and maternal request decreased significantly between delivery cohorts in all women (P,.001) and in nulliparous women specifically (P,.001). Between delivery cohorts, we found that the prevalence of labored indications for cesarean delivery decreased more than nonlabored indications. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a weekly review conference was associated with a reduction in both overall cesarean delivery prevalence and labored indications at our institution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)637-642
Number of pages6
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume132
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Health Personnel
Anesthesiology
Documentation
Obstetrics
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Odds Ratio
Nurses
Head
Mothers
Parturition
Pregnancy
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Association of a health care provider review meeting with cesarean delivery rates : A quality improvement program. / Skeith, Ashley E.; Valent, Amy M.; Marshall, Nicole; Pereira, Leonardo; Caughey, Aaron.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 132, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 637-642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e9bc296431d7417d95d4fce0689d36d0,
title = "Association of a health care provider review meeting with cesarean delivery rates: A quality improvement program",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of a quality improvement effort that was mediated through weekly review of all criteria for cesarean delivery on cesarean delivery prevalence and indications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a natural experiment model that compared two timeframes, from 2009 to 2013, at a single institution. We introduced a weekly retrospective review conference to discuss all cesarean deliveries in 2010 that continued over time. The conferences were attended by obstetric care providers, anesthesiology, and labor and delivery nurses. Date of delivery was dichotomized by those delivering before July 1, 2010, and those delivering after. We included women with term singleton vertex gestations in our study population and then examined the rates of cesarean delivery by date of delivery. We then examined indications for the cesarean deliveries during the study period based on surgeon documentation. x2 tests were used for statistical comparisons and a P value of ,.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: There were 5,541 term singleton cephalic births during the study period. The rate of cesarean delivery declined significantly after our intervention in all women (22.2{\%} vs 27.4{\%}, P,.001) and nulliparous women (23.3{\%} vs 30.9{\%}, P,.001). The adjusted odds ratio of cesarean delivery in all women as related to time cohort is 0.68 (95{\%} CI 0.58-0.79) and 0.56 (95{\%} CI 0.44-0.70) in nulliparous women. We examined indications for the 1,315 cesarean deliveries during the study period by date of delivery. The indications of active-phase arrest, second-stage arrest, failed induction, repeat cesarean delivery, and maternal request decreased significantly between delivery cohorts in all women (P,.001) and in nulliparous women specifically (P,.001). Between delivery cohorts, we found that the prevalence of labored indications for cesarean delivery decreased more than nonlabored indications. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a weekly review conference was associated with a reduction in both overall cesarean delivery prevalence and labored indications at our institution.",
author = "Skeith, {Ashley E.} and Valent, {Amy M.} and Nicole Marshall and Leonardo Pereira and Aaron Caughey",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0000000000002793",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "132",
pages = "637--642",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of a health care provider review meeting with cesarean delivery rates

T2 - A quality improvement program

AU - Skeith, Ashley E.

AU - Valent, Amy M.

AU - Marshall, Nicole

AU - Pereira, Leonardo

AU - Caughey, Aaron

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of a quality improvement effort that was mediated through weekly review of all criteria for cesarean delivery on cesarean delivery prevalence and indications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a natural experiment model that compared two timeframes, from 2009 to 2013, at a single institution. We introduced a weekly retrospective review conference to discuss all cesarean deliveries in 2010 that continued over time. The conferences were attended by obstetric care providers, anesthesiology, and labor and delivery nurses. Date of delivery was dichotomized by those delivering before July 1, 2010, and those delivering after. We included women with term singleton vertex gestations in our study population and then examined the rates of cesarean delivery by date of delivery. We then examined indications for the cesarean deliveries during the study period based on surgeon documentation. x2 tests were used for statistical comparisons and a P value of ,.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: There were 5,541 term singleton cephalic births during the study period. The rate of cesarean delivery declined significantly after our intervention in all women (22.2% vs 27.4%, P,.001) and nulliparous women (23.3% vs 30.9%, P,.001). The adjusted odds ratio of cesarean delivery in all women as related to time cohort is 0.68 (95% CI 0.58-0.79) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.44-0.70) in nulliparous women. We examined indications for the 1,315 cesarean deliveries during the study period by date of delivery. The indications of active-phase arrest, second-stage arrest, failed induction, repeat cesarean delivery, and maternal request decreased significantly between delivery cohorts in all women (P,.001) and in nulliparous women specifically (P,.001). Between delivery cohorts, we found that the prevalence of labored indications for cesarean delivery decreased more than nonlabored indications. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a weekly review conference was associated with a reduction in both overall cesarean delivery prevalence and labored indications at our institution.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of a quality improvement effort that was mediated through weekly review of all criteria for cesarean delivery on cesarean delivery prevalence and indications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a natural experiment model that compared two timeframes, from 2009 to 2013, at a single institution. We introduced a weekly retrospective review conference to discuss all cesarean deliveries in 2010 that continued over time. The conferences were attended by obstetric care providers, anesthesiology, and labor and delivery nurses. Date of delivery was dichotomized by those delivering before July 1, 2010, and those delivering after. We included women with term singleton vertex gestations in our study population and then examined the rates of cesarean delivery by date of delivery. We then examined indications for the cesarean deliveries during the study period based on surgeon documentation. x2 tests were used for statistical comparisons and a P value of ,.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: There were 5,541 term singleton cephalic births during the study period. The rate of cesarean delivery declined significantly after our intervention in all women (22.2% vs 27.4%, P,.001) and nulliparous women (23.3% vs 30.9%, P,.001). The adjusted odds ratio of cesarean delivery in all women as related to time cohort is 0.68 (95% CI 0.58-0.79) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.44-0.70) in nulliparous women. We examined indications for the 1,315 cesarean deliveries during the study period by date of delivery. The indications of active-phase arrest, second-stage arrest, failed induction, repeat cesarean delivery, and maternal request decreased significantly between delivery cohorts in all women (P,.001) and in nulliparous women specifically (P,.001). Between delivery cohorts, we found that the prevalence of labored indications for cesarean delivery decreased more than nonlabored indications. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a weekly review conference was associated with a reduction in both overall cesarean delivery prevalence and labored indications at our institution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056484240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056484240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002793

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002793

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 637

EP - 642

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 3

ER -