Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided

Erinne Lubisich, Thomas (Tom) Hilton, Jack Ferracane, Hristina I. Pashova, Bruce Burton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This cross-sectional study by the Northwest PRECEDENT practitioners correlated the location of caries diagnosed in the past 12 months with treatment provided. Methods: An oral health survey was conducted on up to 20 patients per practice for 101 practises in the Northwest PRECEDENT network. A total of 1943 eligible patients were randomly assessed for the location of and treatment provided for caries lesions diagnosed within the past 12 months. Regression analysis using generalized estimating equations (GEE) was performed to assess association of treatment to tooth location and surface characterization, adjusting for age, practice location (urban/rural), dentist gender, and experience level. The analysis accounts for clustering by practice using robust variance estimates. Results: Overall, 55.4% of patients exhibited recent caries and 42.8% received treatment for at least one permanent tooth. 18% of treated teeth were treated with amalgam, and 72% were treated with composite. This percentage varied as a function of tooth surface characteristics, patient characteristics, and dentist characteristics. The results suggest that restoration selection does depend on tooth type and which surfaces are being restored. The odds of a molar receiving an amalgam restoration are 2.44 (95% CI = 1.81-3.30) times higher as compared to a bicuspid, adjusting for all other covariates. When the restoration includes the occlusal surface of a tooth the odds are 0.42 (95% CI = 0.20-0.89) times as great that amalgam will be placed. When the restoration includes the mesial or distal surface of the tooth the odds for amalgam restoration are 2.49 (95% CI = 1.25-4.95) times higher compared to when it does not include these surfaces. Conclusion: Restorative material choice varied based on caries location and practitioner gender.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)302-308
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Tooth
Dentists
Therapeutics
Bicuspid
Oral Health
Health Surveys
Cluster Analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Amalgam
  • Caries location
  • Composite
  • Dental practice-based research
  • Northwest PRECEDENT
  • Restoration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided. / Lubisich, Erinne; Hilton, Thomas (Tom); Ferracane, Jack; Pashova, Hristina I.; Burton, Bruce.

In: Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 39, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 302-308.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f2cca1cfcb714255b8075370422abc67,
title = "Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided",
abstract = "Objectives: This cross-sectional study by the Northwest PRECEDENT practitioners correlated the location of caries diagnosed in the past 12 months with treatment provided. Methods: An oral health survey was conducted on up to 20 patients per practice for 101 practises in the Northwest PRECEDENT network. A total of 1943 eligible patients were randomly assessed for the location of and treatment provided for caries lesions diagnosed within the past 12 months. Regression analysis using generalized estimating equations (GEE) was performed to assess association of treatment to tooth location and surface characterization, adjusting for age, practice location (urban/rural), dentist gender, and experience level. The analysis accounts for clustering by practice using robust variance estimates. Results: Overall, 55.4{\%} of patients exhibited recent caries and 42.8{\%} received treatment for at least one permanent tooth. 18{\%} of treated teeth were treated with amalgam, and 72{\%} were treated with composite. This percentage varied as a function of tooth surface characteristics, patient characteristics, and dentist characteristics. The results suggest that restoration selection does depend on tooth type and which surfaces are being restored. The odds of a molar receiving an amalgam restoration are 2.44 (95{\%} CI = 1.81-3.30) times higher as compared to a bicuspid, adjusting for all other covariates. When the restoration includes the occlusal surface of a tooth the odds are 0.42 (95{\%} CI = 0.20-0.89) times as great that amalgam will be placed. When the restoration includes the mesial or distal surface of the tooth the odds for amalgam restoration are 2.49 (95{\%} CI = 1.25-4.95) times higher compared to when it does not include these surfaces. Conclusion: Restorative material choice varied based on caries location and practitioner gender.",
keywords = "Amalgam, Caries location, Composite, Dental practice-based research, Northwest PRECEDENT, Restoration",
author = "Erinne Lubisich and Hilton, {Thomas (Tom)} and Jack Ferracane and Pashova, {Hristina I.} and Bruce Burton",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "302--308",
journal = "Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided

AU - Lubisich, Erinne

AU - Hilton, Thomas (Tom)

AU - Ferracane, Jack

AU - Pashova, Hristina I.

AU - Burton, Bruce

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Objectives: This cross-sectional study by the Northwest PRECEDENT practitioners correlated the location of caries diagnosed in the past 12 months with treatment provided. Methods: An oral health survey was conducted on up to 20 patients per practice for 101 practises in the Northwest PRECEDENT network. A total of 1943 eligible patients were randomly assessed for the location of and treatment provided for caries lesions diagnosed within the past 12 months. Regression analysis using generalized estimating equations (GEE) was performed to assess association of treatment to tooth location and surface characterization, adjusting for age, practice location (urban/rural), dentist gender, and experience level. The analysis accounts for clustering by practice using robust variance estimates. Results: Overall, 55.4% of patients exhibited recent caries and 42.8% received treatment for at least one permanent tooth. 18% of treated teeth were treated with amalgam, and 72% were treated with composite. This percentage varied as a function of tooth surface characteristics, patient characteristics, and dentist characteristics. The results suggest that restoration selection does depend on tooth type and which surfaces are being restored. The odds of a molar receiving an amalgam restoration are 2.44 (95% CI = 1.81-3.30) times higher as compared to a bicuspid, adjusting for all other covariates. When the restoration includes the occlusal surface of a tooth the odds are 0.42 (95% CI = 0.20-0.89) times as great that amalgam will be placed. When the restoration includes the mesial or distal surface of the tooth the odds for amalgam restoration are 2.49 (95% CI = 1.25-4.95) times higher compared to when it does not include these surfaces. Conclusion: Restorative material choice varied based on caries location and practitioner gender.

AB - Objectives: This cross-sectional study by the Northwest PRECEDENT practitioners correlated the location of caries diagnosed in the past 12 months with treatment provided. Methods: An oral health survey was conducted on up to 20 patients per practice for 101 practises in the Northwest PRECEDENT network. A total of 1943 eligible patients were randomly assessed for the location of and treatment provided for caries lesions diagnosed within the past 12 months. Regression analysis using generalized estimating equations (GEE) was performed to assess association of treatment to tooth location and surface characterization, adjusting for age, practice location (urban/rural), dentist gender, and experience level. The analysis accounts for clustering by practice using robust variance estimates. Results: Overall, 55.4% of patients exhibited recent caries and 42.8% received treatment for at least one permanent tooth. 18% of treated teeth were treated with amalgam, and 72% were treated with composite. This percentage varied as a function of tooth surface characteristics, patient characteristics, and dentist characteristics. The results suggest that restoration selection does depend on tooth type and which surfaces are being restored. The odds of a molar receiving an amalgam restoration are 2.44 (95% CI = 1.81-3.30) times higher as compared to a bicuspid, adjusting for all other covariates. When the restoration includes the occlusal surface of a tooth the odds are 0.42 (95% CI = 0.20-0.89) times as great that amalgam will be placed. When the restoration includes the mesial or distal surface of the tooth the odds for amalgam restoration are 2.49 (95% CI = 1.25-4.95) times higher compared to when it does not include these surfaces. Conclusion: Restorative material choice varied based on caries location and practitioner gender.

KW - Amalgam

KW - Caries location

KW - Composite

KW - Dental practice-based research

KW - Northwest PRECEDENT

KW - Restoration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952988122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952988122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 21256915

AN - SCOPUS:79952988122

VL - 39

SP - 302

EP - 308

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0300-5712

IS - 4

ER -