Assessment of frame-averaging algorithms in OCT image analysis

Wei Wu, Ou Tan, Rajeev R. Pappuru, Huilong Duan, David Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objective: To evaluate frame registration and averaging algorithms for optical coherence tomography. Patients and Methods: Twenty normal and 20 glaucomatous eyes were imaged. Objective differences were measured by comparing noise variance, spread of edge, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Subjective image quality was also evaluated. Results: Two frame-averaging algorithms (FA400 and FA407) had better noise variance and contrast-to-noise ratio but worse spread of edge than did single frames (P <.01). Both algorithms provided better subjective assessments of structure boundaries than did single images (P <.001). FA407 had significantly lower spread of edge and better internal limiting membrane visualization than FA400. Conclusion: Frame averaging significantly suppressed speckle noise and increased the visibility of retinal structures, but imperfect image registration caused edge blurring that could be detected by the spread of edge parameter. In frame-averaging algorithms, higher contrast-to-noise ratio and lower noise variance indicated better noise suppression, but spread of edge was most sensitive in comparing edge preservation between algorithms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-175
Number of pages8
JournalOphthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Noise
Optical Coherence Tomography
Membranes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Assessment of frame-averaging algorithms in OCT image analysis. / Wu, Wei; Tan, Ou; Pappuru, Rajeev R.; Duan, Huilong; Huang, David.

In: Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina, Vol. 44, No. 2, 03.2013, p. 168-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wu, Wei ; Tan, Ou ; Pappuru, Rajeev R. ; Duan, Huilong ; Huang, David. / Assessment of frame-averaging algorithms in OCT image analysis. In: Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2013 ; Vol. 44, No. 2. pp. 168-175.
@article{3e6d0ee7978d4e948eb88b6b30bd2c63,
title = "Assessment of frame-averaging algorithms in OCT image analysis",
abstract = "Background and Objective: To evaluate frame registration and averaging algorithms for optical coherence tomography. Patients and Methods: Twenty normal and 20 glaucomatous eyes were imaged. Objective differences were measured by comparing noise variance, spread of edge, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Subjective image quality was also evaluated. Results: Two frame-averaging algorithms (FA400 and FA407) had better noise variance and contrast-to-noise ratio but worse spread of edge than did single frames (P <.01). Both algorithms provided better subjective assessments of structure boundaries than did single images (P <.001). FA407 had significantly lower spread of edge and better internal limiting membrane visualization than FA400. Conclusion: Frame averaging significantly suppressed speckle noise and increased the visibility of retinal structures, but imperfect image registration caused edge blurring that could be detected by the spread of edge parameter. In frame-averaging algorithms, higher contrast-to-noise ratio and lower noise variance indicated better noise suppression, but spread of edge was most sensitive in comparing edge preservation between algorithms.",
author = "Wei Wu and Ou Tan and Pappuru, {Rajeev R.} and Huilong Duan and David Huang",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.3928/23258160-20130313-09",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "168--175",
journal = "Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina",
issn = "2325-8160",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of frame-averaging algorithms in OCT image analysis

AU - Wu, Wei

AU - Tan, Ou

AU - Pappuru, Rajeev R.

AU - Duan, Huilong

AU - Huang, David

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Background and Objective: To evaluate frame registration and averaging algorithms for optical coherence tomography. Patients and Methods: Twenty normal and 20 glaucomatous eyes were imaged. Objective differences were measured by comparing noise variance, spread of edge, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Subjective image quality was also evaluated. Results: Two frame-averaging algorithms (FA400 and FA407) had better noise variance and contrast-to-noise ratio but worse spread of edge than did single frames (P <.01). Both algorithms provided better subjective assessments of structure boundaries than did single images (P <.001). FA407 had significantly lower spread of edge and better internal limiting membrane visualization than FA400. Conclusion: Frame averaging significantly suppressed speckle noise and increased the visibility of retinal structures, but imperfect image registration caused edge blurring that could be detected by the spread of edge parameter. In frame-averaging algorithms, higher contrast-to-noise ratio and lower noise variance indicated better noise suppression, but spread of edge was most sensitive in comparing edge preservation between algorithms.

AB - Background and Objective: To evaluate frame registration and averaging algorithms for optical coherence tomography. Patients and Methods: Twenty normal and 20 glaucomatous eyes were imaged. Objective differences were measured by comparing noise variance, spread of edge, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Subjective image quality was also evaluated. Results: Two frame-averaging algorithms (FA400 and FA407) had better noise variance and contrast-to-noise ratio but worse spread of edge than did single frames (P <.01). Both algorithms provided better subjective assessments of structure boundaries than did single images (P <.001). FA407 had significantly lower spread of edge and better internal limiting membrane visualization than FA400. Conclusion: Frame averaging significantly suppressed speckle noise and increased the visibility of retinal structures, but imperfect image registration caused edge blurring that could be detected by the spread of edge parameter. In frame-averaging algorithms, higher contrast-to-noise ratio and lower noise variance indicated better noise suppression, but spread of edge was most sensitive in comparing edge preservation between algorithms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875969168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875969168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3928/23258160-20130313-09

DO - 10.3928/23258160-20130313-09

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 168

EP - 175

JO - Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina

JF - Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina

SN - 2325-8160

IS - 2

ER -