Assessment of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Artifacts from Different Intracanal Materials on Birooted Teeth

Elisa Diniz de Lima, Ana Priscila Lira de Farias Freitas, Fernanda Clotilde Mariz Suassuna, Saulo Sousa Melo, Patricia Meira Bento, Daniela Pita de Melo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: This study quantitatively evaluated the type and amount of image artifacts generated by different intracanal materials in birooted teeth scanned at different exposure parameters. Methods: The sample consisted of 15 birooted premolars. Seven different intracanal material combinations were used in each tooth one at a time: (1) roots without intracanal materials, (2) roots with gutta-percha, (3) a buccal root with gutta-percha and a lingual root with a fiberglass post, (4) a buccal root with gutta-percha and a lingual root with a metal core fiberglass post, (5) buccal and lingual roots with fiberglass posts, (6) buccal and lingual roots with metal core fiberglass posts, and (7) buccal and lingual roots with NiCr metal posts. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans were acquired using a CS 9000 unit (Carestream Dental, Atlanta, GA). An image of each tooth was captured under 5 exposure parameters: 2.5, 4, 6.3, 8, and 12 mA. The voxel size, field of view, and tube voltage were fixed at 0.076 mm, 5 × 3.75 cm, and 75 kV. We assessed each artifact quantitatively using ImageJ's threshold tool (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) to determine the hypodense and hyperdense artifact areas within 8-bit images extracted from the scans. All analyses were conducted with a 95% confidence level (α <0.05). Results: The inferential analysis showed that roots filled with metal posts presented the highest amount of hypodense and hyperdense artifacts, whereas fiberglass post in both roots presented fewer artifacts. All materials presented more hypodense than hyperdense artifact formation. Overall, the low-exposure settings presented fewer artifacts and higher values of preserved dental images. Conclusions: Low-exposure protocols and fiberglass posts presented fewer image artifacts in CBCT scans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-213.e2
JournalJournal of endodontics
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Artifacts
Tooth
Cheek
Tongue
Gutta-Percha
Metals
Bicuspid
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
fiberglass

Keywords

  • Artifacts
  • cone-beam computed tomography
  • fiberglass

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Diniz de Lima, E., Lira de Farias Freitas, A. P., Mariz Suassuna, F. C., Sousa Melo, S., Bento, P. M., & Pita de Melo, D. (2019). Assessment of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Artifacts from Different Intracanal Materials on Birooted Teeth. Journal of endodontics, 45(2), 209-213.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.007

Assessment of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Artifacts from Different Intracanal Materials on Birooted Teeth. / Diniz de Lima, Elisa; Lira de Farias Freitas, Ana Priscila; Mariz Suassuna, Fernanda Clotilde; Sousa Melo, Saulo; Bento, Patricia Meira; Pita de Melo, Daniela.

In: Journal of endodontics, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 209-213.e2.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Diniz de Lima, E, Lira de Farias Freitas, AP, Mariz Suassuna, FC, Sousa Melo, S, Bento, PM & Pita de Melo, D 2019, 'Assessment of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Artifacts from Different Intracanal Materials on Birooted Teeth', Journal of endodontics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 209-213.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.007
Diniz de Lima, Elisa ; Lira de Farias Freitas, Ana Priscila ; Mariz Suassuna, Fernanda Clotilde ; Sousa Melo, Saulo ; Bento, Patricia Meira ; Pita de Melo, Daniela. / Assessment of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Artifacts from Different Intracanal Materials on Birooted Teeth. In: Journal of endodontics. 2019 ; Vol. 45, No. 2. pp. 209-213.e2.
@article{068d220f49f04579b340452ac31f7def,
title = "Assessment of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Artifacts from Different Intracanal Materials on Birooted Teeth",
abstract = "Introduction: This study quantitatively evaluated the type and amount of image artifacts generated by different intracanal materials in birooted teeth scanned at different exposure parameters. Methods: The sample consisted of 15 birooted premolars. Seven different intracanal material combinations were used in each tooth one at a time: (1) roots without intracanal materials, (2) roots with gutta-percha, (3) a buccal root with gutta-percha and a lingual root with a fiberglass post, (4) a buccal root with gutta-percha and a lingual root with a metal core fiberglass post, (5) buccal and lingual roots with fiberglass posts, (6) buccal and lingual roots with metal core fiberglass posts, and (7) buccal and lingual roots with NiCr metal posts. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans were acquired using a CS 9000 unit (Carestream Dental, Atlanta, GA). An image of each tooth was captured under 5 exposure parameters: 2.5, 4, 6.3, 8, and 12 mA. The voxel size, field of view, and tube voltage were fixed at 0.076 mm, 5 × 3.75 cm, and 75 kV. We assessed each artifact quantitatively using ImageJ's threshold tool (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) to determine the hypodense and hyperdense artifact areas within 8-bit images extracted from the scans. All analyses were conducted with a 95{\%} confidence level (α <0.05). Results: The inferential analysis showed that roots filled with metal posts presented the highest amount of hypodense and hyperdense artifacts, whereas fiberglass post in both roots presented fewer artifacts. All materials presented more hypodense than hyperdense artifact formation. Overall, the low-exposure settings presented fewer artifacts and higher values of preserved dental images. Conclusions: Low-exposure protocols and fiberglass posts presented fewer image artifacts in CBCT scans.",
keywords = "Artifacts, cone-beam computed tomography, fiberglass",
author = "{Diniz de Lima}, Elisa and {Lira de Farias Freitas}, {Ana Priscila} and {Mariz Suassuna}, {Fernanda Clotilde} and {Sousa Melo}, Saulo and Bento, {Patricia Meira} and {Pita de Melo}, Daniela",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "209--213.e2",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Artifacts from Different Intracanal Materials on Birooted Teeth

AU - Diniz de Lima, Elisa

AU - Lira de Farias Freitas, Ana Priscila

AU - Mariz Suassuna, Fernanda Clotilde

AU - Sousa Melo, Saulo

AU - Bento, Patricia Meira

AU - Pita de Melo, Daniela

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Introduction: This study quantitatively evaluated the type and amount of image artifacts generated by different intracanal materials in birooted teeth scanned at different exposure parameters. Methods: The sample consisted of 15 birooted premolars. Seven different intracanal material combinations were used in each tooth one at a time: (1) roots without intracanal materials, (2) roots with gutta-percha, (3) a buccal root with gutta-percha and a lingual root with a fiberglass post, (4) a buccal root with gutta-percha and a lingual root with a metal core fiberglass post, (5) buccal and lingual roots with fiberglass posts, (6) buccal and lingual roots with metal core fiberglass posts, and (7) buccal and lingual roots with NiCr metal posts. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans were acquired using a CS 9000 unit (Carestream Dental, Atlanta, GA). An image of each tooth was captured under 5 exposure parameters: 2.5, 4, 6.3, 8, and 12 mA. The voxel size, field of view, and tube voltage were fixed at 0.076 mm, 5 × 3.75 cm, and 75 kV. We assessed each artifact quantitatively using ImageJ's threshold tool (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) to determine the hypodense and hyperdense artifact areas within 8-bit images extracted from the scans. All analyses were conducted with a 95% confidence level (α <0.05). Results: The inferential analysis showed that roots filled with metal posts presented the highest amount of hypodense and hyperdense artifacts, whereas fiberglass post in both roots presented fewer artifacts. All materials presented more hypodense than hyperdense artifact formation. Overall, the low-exposure settings presented fewer artifacts and higher values of preserved dental images. Conclusions: Low-exposure protocols and fiberglass posts presented fewer image artifacts in CBCT scans.

AB - Introduction: This study quantitatively evaluated the type and amount of image artifacts generated by different intracanal materials in birooted teeth scanned at different exposure parameters. Methods: The sample consisted of 15 birooted premolars. Seven different intracanal material combinations were used in each tooth one at a time: (1) roots without intracanal materials, (2) roots with gutta-percha, (3) a buccal root with gutta-percha and a lingual root with a fiberglass post, (4) a buccal root with gutta-percha and a lingual root with a metal core fiberglass post, (5) buccal and lingual roots with fiberglass posts, (6) buccal and lingual roots with metal core fiberglass posts, and (7) buccal and lingual roots with NiCr metal posts. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans were acquired using a CS 9000 unit (Carestream Dental, Atlanta, GA). An image of each tooth was captured under 5 exposure parameters: 2.5, 4, 6.3, 8, and 12 mA. The voxel size, field of view, and tube voltage were fixed at 0.076 mm, 5 × 3.75 cm, and 75 kV. We assessed each artifact quantitatively using ImageJ's threshold tool (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) to determine the hypodense and hyperdense artifact areas within 8-bit images extracted from the scans. All analyses were conducted with a 95% confidence level (α <0.05). Results: The inferential analysis showed that roots filled with metal posts presented the highest amount of hypodense and hyperdense artifacts, whereas fiberglass post in both roots presented fewer artifacts. All materials presented more hypodense than hyperdense artifact formation. Overall, the low-exposure settings presented fewer artifacts and higher values of preserved dental images. Conclusions: Low-exposure protocols and fiberglass posts presented fewer image artifacts in CBCT scans.

KW - Artifacts

KW - cone-beam computed tomography

KW - fiberglass

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060699678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060699678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.007

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 209-213.e2

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 2

ER -