Assessing the accuracy of patient report of the 5As (ask, assess, advise, assist, and arrange) for smoking cessation counseling

Sue Flocke, Elizabeth Antognoli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The 5As framework (ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange) is a recommended strategy for smoking cessation counseling in primary care. This study compares patient report with direct observation to assess the degree of recall bias for each of the 5As. Methods: Primary care visits by 107 adult smokers and 16 physicians were audio-recorded. Within 48 hours after the visit, patients completed a survey assessing whether or not smoking was discussed and items specific to each of the 5As. The audio recordings were evaluated to assess the presence of each A. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of patient report versus direct observation were computed. Results: The frequency of the 5As based on evaluation of the audio recording ranged from 13% (arrange) to 98% (ask). The sensitivity and specificity of patient report were 92% and not applicable for ask, 90% and 50% for assess, 94% and 33% for advise, 90% and 50% for assist, and 85% and 67% for arrange follow-up. Positive predictive values ranged from 28% to 98%; negative predictive values ranged from 0% to 97%. Conclusion: Compared with the gold standard of direct observation, patient report of each of the 5As is reasonably sensitive but not specific. Patients overreport the occurrence of each of the 5As.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-169
Number of pages6
JournalFamily Medicine and Community Health
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Smoking Cessation
Counseling
Observation
Primary Health Care
Sensitivity and Specificity
Smoking
Physicians

Keywords

  • 5As (ask, assess, advise, assist, arrange)
  • Primary care
  • Smoking cessation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Assessing the accuracy of patient report of the 5As (ask, assess, advise, assist, and arrange) for smoking cessation counseling. / Flocke, Sue; Antognoli, Elizabeth.

In: Family Medicine and Community Health, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.10.2017, p. 164-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fdf5396dbedd49668c1cf402042f8269,
title = "Assessing the accuracy of patient report of the 5As (ask, assess, advise, assist, and arrange) for smoking cessation counseling",
abstract = "Objective: The 5As framework (ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange) is a recommended strategy for smoking cessation counseling in primary care. This study compares patient report with direct observation to assess the degree of recall bias for each of the 5As. Methods: Primary care visits by 107 adult smokers and 16 physicians were audio-recorded. Within 48 hours after the visit, patients completed a survey assessing whether or not smoking was discussed and items specific to each of the 5As. The audio recordings were evaluated to assess the presence of each A. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of patient report versus direct observation were computed. Results: The frequency of the 5As based on evaluation of the audio recording ranged from 13{\%} (arrange) to 98{\%} (ask). The sensitivity and specificity of patient report were 92{\%} and not applicable for ask, 90{\%} and 50{\%} for assess, 94{\%} and 33{\%} for advise, 90{\%} and 50{\%} for assist, and 85{\%} and 67{\%} for arrange follow-up. Positive predictive values ranged from 28{\%} to 98{\%}; negative predictive values ranged from 0{\%} to 97{\%}. Conclusion: Compared with the gold standard of direct observation, patient report of each of the 5As is reasonably sensitive but not specific. Patients overreport the occurrence of each of the 5As.",
keywords = "5As (ask, assess, advise, assist, arrange), Primary care, Smoking cessation",
author = "Sue Flocke and Elizabeth Antognoli",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.15212/FMCH.2017.0116",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "164--169",
journal = "Family Medicine and Community Health",
issn = "2305-6983",
publisher = "Compuscript Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the accuracy of patient report of the 5As (ask, assess, advise, assist, and arrange) for smoking cessation counseling

AU - Flocke, Sue

AU - Antognoli, Elizabeth

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Objective: The 5As framework (ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange) is a recommended strategy for smoking cessation counseling in primary care. This study compares patient report with direct observation to assess the degree of recall bias for each of the 5As. Methods: Primary care visits by 107 adult smokers and 16 physicians were audio-recorded. Within 48 hours after the visit, patients completed a survey assessing whether or not smoking was discussed and items specific to each of the 5As. The audio recordings were evaluated to assess the presence of each A. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of patient report versus direct observation were computed. Results: The frequency of the 5As based on evaluation of the audio recording ranged from 13% (arrange) to 98% (ask). The sensitivity and specificity of patient report were 92% and not applicable for ask, 90% and 50% for assess, 94% and 33% for advise, 90% and 50% for assist, and 85% and 67% for arrange follow-up. Positive predictive values ranged from 28% to 98%; negative predictive values ranged from 0% to 97%. Conclusion: Compared with the gold standard of direct observation, patient report of each of the 5As is reasonably sensitive but not specific. Patients overreport the occurrence of each of the 5As.

AB - Objective: The 5As framework (ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange) is a recommended strategy for smoking cessation counseling in primary care. This study compares patient report with direct observation to assess the degree of recall bias for each of the 5As. Methods: Primary care visits by 107 adult smokers and 16 physicians were audio-recorded. Within 48 hours after the visit, patients completed a survey assessing whether or not smoking was discussed and items specific to each of the 5As. The audio recordings were evaluated to assess the presence of each A. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of patient report versus direct observation were computed. Results: The frequency of the 5As based on evaluation of the audio recording ranged from 13% (arrange) to 98% (ask). The sensitivity and specificity of patient report were 92% and not applicable for ask, 90% and 50% for assess, 94% and 33% for advise, 90% and 50% for assist, and 85% and 67% for arrange follow-up. Positive predictive values ranged from 28% to 98%; negative predictive values ranged from 0% to 97%. Conclusion: Compared with the gold standard of direct observation, patient report of each of the 5As is reasonably sensitive but not specific. Patients overreport the occurrence of each of the 5As.

KW - 5As (ask, assess, advise, assist, arrange)

KW - Primary care

KW - Smoking cessation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033390996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033390996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15212/FMCH.2017.0116

DO - 10.15212/FMCH.2017.0116

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 164

EP - 169

JO - Family Medicine and Community Health

JF - Family Medicine and Community Health

SN - 2305-6983

IS - 3

ER -