Assessing Chronic Illness Care Education (ACIC-E): A tool for tracking educational re-design for improving chronic care education

Judith Bowen, Lloyd Provost, David P. Stevens, Julie K. Johnson, Donna M. Woods, Connie S. Sixta, Edward H. Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent Breakthrough Series Collaboratives have focused on improving chronic illness care, but few have included academic practices, and none have specifically targeted residency education in parallel with improving clinical care. Tools are available for assessing progress with clinical improvements, but no similar instruments have been developed for monitoring educational improvements for chronic care education. AIM: To design a survey to assist teaching practices with identifying curricular gaps in chronic care education and monitor efforts to address those gaps. METHODS: During a national academic chronic care collaborative, we used an iterative method to develop and pilot test a survey instrument modeled after the Assessing Chronic Illness Care (ACIC). We implemented this instrument, the ACIC-Education, in a second collaborative and assessed the relationship of survey results with reported educational measures. PARTICIPANTS: A combined 57 self-selected teams from 37 teaching hospitals enrolled in one of two collaboratives. ANALYSIS: We used descriptive statistics to report mean ACIC-E scores and educational measurement results, and Pearson's test for correlation between the final ACIC-E score and reported educational measures. RESULTS: A total of 29 teams from the national collaborative and 15 teams from the second collaborative in California completed the final ACIC-E. The instrument measured progress on all sub-scales of the Chronic Care Model. Fourteen California teams (70%) reported using two to six education measures (mean 4.3). The relationship between the final survey results and the number of educational measures reported was weak (R2=0.06, p=0.376), but improved when a single outlier was removed (R2=0.37, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The ACIC-E instrument proved feasible to complete. Participating teams, on average, recorded modest improvement in all areas measured by the instrument over the duration of the collaboratives. The relationship between the final ACIC-E score and the number of educational measures was weak. Further research on its utility and validity is required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume25
Issue numberSUPPL. 4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Chronic Disease
Education
Educational Measurement
Internship and Residency
Teaching Hospitals
Teaching
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research

Keywords

  • ambulatory care
  • assessment
  • chronic care
  • graduate medical education
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Assessing Chronic Illness Care Education (ACIC-E) : A tool for tracking educational re-design for improving chronic care education. / Bowen, Judith; Provost, Lloyd; Stevens, David P.; Johnson, Julie K.; Woods, Donna M.; Sixta, Connie S.; Wagner, Edward H.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 25, No. SUPPL. 4, 09.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bowen, Judith ; Provost, Lloyd ; Stevens, David P. ; Johnson, Julie K. ; Woods, Donna M. ; Sixta, Connie S. ; Wagner, Edward H. / Assessing Chronic Illness Care Education (ACIC-E) : A tool for tracking educational re-design for improving chronic care education. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. SUPPL. 4.
@article{7654d3254b944b73b95e706ce53837bb,
title = "Assessing Chronic Illness Care Education (ACIC-E): A tool for tracking educational re-design for improving chronic care education",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Recent Breakthrough Series Collaboratives have focused on improving chronic illness care, but few have included academic practices, and none have specifically targeted residency education in parallel with improving clinical care. Tools are available for assessing progress with clinical improvements, but no similar instruments have been developed for monitoring educational improvements for chronic care education. AIM: To design a survey to assist teaching practices with identifying curricular gaps in chronic care education and monitor efforts to address those gaps. METHODS: During a national academic chronic care collaborative, we used an iterative method to develop and pilot test a survey instrument modeled after the Assessing Chronic Illness Care (ACIC). We implemented this instrument, the ACIC-Education, in a second collaborative and assessed the relationship of survey results with reported educational measures. PARTICIPANTS: A combined 57 self-selected teams from 37 teaching hospitals enrolled in one of two collaboratives. ANALYSIS: We used descriptive statistics to report mean ACIC-E scores and educational measurement results, and Pearson's test for correlation between the final ACIC-E score and reported educational measures. RESULTS: A total of 29 teams from the national collaborative and 15 teams from the second collaborative in California completed the final ACIC-E. The instrument measured progress on all sub-scales of the Chronic Care Model. Fourteen California teams (70{\%}) reported using two to six education measures (mean 4.3). The relationship between the final survey results and the number of educational measures reported was weak (R2=0.06, p=0.376), but improved when a single outlier was removed (R2=0.37, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The ACIC-E instrument proved feasible to complete. Participating teams, on average, recorded modest improvement in all areas measured by the instrument over the duration of the collaboratives. The relationship between the final ACIC-E score and the number of educational measures was weak. Further research on its utility and validity is required.",
keywords = "ambulatory care, assessment, chronic care, graduate medical education, quality improvement",
author = "Judith Bowen and Lloyd Provost and Stevens, {David P.} and Johnson, {Julie K.} and Woods, {Donna M.} and Sixta, {Connie S.} and Wagner, {Edward H.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-010-1385-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "SUPPL. 4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Chronic Illness Care Education (ACIC-E)

T2 - A tool for tracking educational re-design for improving chronic care education

AU - Bowen, Judith

AU - Provost, Lloyd

AU - Stevens, David P.

AU - Johnson, Julie K.

AU - Woods, Donna M.

AU - Sixta, Connie S.

AU - Wagner, Edward H.

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - BACKGROUND: Recent Breakthrough Series Collaboratives have focused on improving chronic illness care, but few have included academic practices, and none have specifically targeted residency education in parallel with improving clinical care. Tools are available for assessing progress with clinical improvements, but no similar instruments have been developed for monitoring educational improvements for chronic care education. AIM: To design a survey to assist teaching practices with identifying curricular gaps in chronic care education and monitor efforts to address those gaps. METHODS: During a national academic chronic care collaborative, we used an iterative method to develop and pilot test a survey instrument modeled after the Assessing Chronic Illness Care (ACIC). We implemented this instrument, the ACIC-Education, in a second collaborative and assessed the relationship of survey results with reported educational measures. PARTICIPANTS: A combined 57 self-selected teams from 37 teaching hospitals enrolled in one of two collaboratives. ANALYSIS: We used descriptive statistics to report mean ACIC-E scores and educational measurement results, and Pearson's test for correlation between the final ACIC-E score and reported educational measures. RESULTS: A total of 29 teams from the national collaborative and 15 teams from the second collaborative in California completed the final ACIC-E. The instrument measured progress on all sub-scales of the Chronic Care Model. Fourteen California teams (70%) reported using two to six education measures (mean 4.3). The relationship between the final survey results and the number of educational measures reported was weak (R2=0.06, p=0.376), but improved when a single outlier was removed (R2=0.37, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The ACIC-E instrument proved feasible to complete. Participating teams, on average, recorded modest improvement in all areas measured by the instrument over the duration of the collaboratives. The relationship between the final ACIC-E score and the number of educational measures was weak. Further research on its utility and validity is required.

AB - BACKGROUND: Recent Breakthrough Series Collaboratives have focused on improving chronic illness care, but few have included academic practices, and none have specifically targeted residency education in parallel with improving clinical care. Tools are available for assessing progress with clinical improvements, but no similar instruments have been developed for monitoring educational improvements for chronic care education. AIM: To design a survey to assist teaching practices with identifying curricular gaps in chronic care education and monitor efforts to address those gaps. METHODS: During a national academic chronic care collaborative, we used an iterative method to develop and pilot test a survey instrument modeled after the Assessing Chronic Illness Care (ACIC). We implemented this instrument, the ACIC-Education, in a second collaborative and assessed the relationship of survey results with reported educational measures. PARTICIPANTS: A combined 57 self-selected teams from 37 teaching hospitals enrolled in one of two collaboratives. ANALYSIS: We used descriptive statistics to report mean ACIC-E scores and educational measurement results, and Pearson's test for correlation between the final ACIC-E score and reported educational measures. RESULTS: A total of 29 teams from the national collaborative and 15 teams from the second collaborative in California completed the final ACIC-E. The instrument measured progress on all sub-scales of the Chronic Care Model. Fourteen California teams (70%) reported using two to six education measures (mean 4.3). The relationship between the final survey results and the number of educational measures reported was weak (R2=0.06, p=0.376), but improved when a single outlier was removed (R2=0.37, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The ACIC-E instrument proved feasible to complete. Participating teams, on average, recorded modest improvement in all areas measured by the instrument over the duration of the collaboratives. The relationship between the final ACIC-E score and the number of educational measures was weak. Further research on its utility and validity is required.

KW - ambulatory care

KW - assessment

KW - chronic care

KW - graduate medical education

KW - quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957225127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957225127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-010-1385-y

DO - 10.1007/s11606-010-1385-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 20737235

AN - SCOPUS:77957225127

VL - 25

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - SUPPL. 4

ER -