Aquatic habitat measurement and valuation: Imputing social benefits to instream flow levels

Aaron J. Douglas, Richard Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Instream flow conflicts have been analysed from the perspectives offered by policy oriented applied (physical) science, theories of conflict resolution and negotiation strategy, and psychological analyses of the behavior patterns of the bargaining parties. Economics also offers some useful insights in analysing conflict resolution within the context of these water allocation problems. We attempt to analyse the economics of the bargaining process in conjunction with a discussion of the water allocation process. In particular, we examine in detail the relation between certain habitat estimation techniques, and the socially optimal allocation of non-market resources. The results developed here describe the welfare implications implicit in the contemporary general equilibrium analysis of a competitive market economy. We also review certain currently available techniques for assigning dollar values to the social benefits of instream flow. The limitations of non-market valuation techniques with respect to estimating the benefits provided by instream flows and the aquatic habitat contingent on these flows should not deter resource managers from using economic analysis as a basic tool for settling instream flow conflicts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-280
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

instream flow
valuation
Economics
bargaining
Economic analysis
habitat
Water
Managers
general equilibrium analysis
physical science
resource
economic analysis
economics
water
conflict
allocation

Keywords

  • conflict resolution
  • economic analysis
  • instream flow
  • water allocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Aquatic habitat measurement and valuation : Imputing social benefits to instream flow levels. / Douglas, Aaron J.; Johnson, Richard.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1991, p. 267-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1bb66793b8014ffcb1e5d06a96309716,
title = "Aquatic habitat measurement and valuation: Imputing social benefits to instream flow levels",
abstract = "Instream flow conflicts have been analysed from the perspectives offered by policy oriented applied (physical) science, theories of conflict resolution and negotiation strategy, and psychological analyses of the behavior patterns of the bargaining parties. Economics also offers some useful insights in analysing conflict resolution within the context of these water allocation problems. We attempt to analyse the economics of the bargaining process in conjunction with a discussion of the water allocation process. In particular, we examine in detail the relation between certain habitat estimation techniques, and the socially optimal allocation of non-market resources. The results developed here describe the welfare implications implicit in the contemporary general equilibrium analysis of a competitive market economy. We also review certain currently available techniques for assigning dollar values to the social benefits of instream flow. The limitations of non-market valuation techniques with respect to estimating the benefits provided by instream flows and the aquatic habitat contingent on these flows should not deter resource managers from using economic analysis as a basic tool for settling instream flow conflicts.",
keywords = "conflict resolution, economic analysis, instream flow, water allocation",
author = "Douglas, {Aaron J.} and Richard Johnson",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80057-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "267--280",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aquatic habitat measurement and valuation

T2 - Imputing social benefits to instream flow levels

AU - Douglas, Aaron J.

AU - Johnson, Richard

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Instream flow conflicts have been analysed from the perspectives offered by policy oriented applied (physical) science, theories of conflict resolution and negotiation strategy, and psychological analyses of the behavior patterns of the bargaining parties. Economics also offers some useful insights in analysing conflict resolution within the context of these water allocation problems. We attempt to analyse the economics of the bargaining process in conjunction with a discussion of the water allocation process. In particular, we examine in detail the relation between certain habitat estimation techniques, and the socially optimal allocation of non-market resources. The results developed here describe the welfare implications implicit in the contemporary general equilibrium analysis of a competitive market economy. We also review certain currently available techniques for assigning dollar values to the social benefits of instream flow. The limitations of non-market valuation techniques with respect to estimating the benefits provided by instream flows and the aquatic habitat contingent on these flows should not deter resource managers from using economic analysis as a basic tool for settling instream flow conflicts.

AB - Instream flow conflicts have been analysed from the perspectives offered by policy oriented applied (physical) science, theories of conflict resolution and negotiation strategy, and psychological analyses of the behavior patterns of the bargaining parties. Economics also offers some useful insights in analysing conflict resolution within the context of these water allocation problems. We attempt to analyse the economics of the bargaining process in conjunction with a discussion of the water allocation process. In particular, we examine in detail the relation between certain habitat estimation techniques, and the socially optimal allocation of non-market resources. The results developed here describe the welfare implications implicit in the contemporary general equilibrium analysis of a competitive market economy. We also review certain currently available techniques for assigning dollar values to the social benefits of instream flow. The limitations of non-market valuation techniques with respect to estimating the benefits provided by instream flows and the aquatic habitat contingent on these flows should not deter resource managers from using economic analysis as a basic tool for settling instream flow conflicts.

KW - conflict resolution

KW - economic analysis

KW - instream flow

KW - water allocation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025922070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025922070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80057-X

DO - 10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80057-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0025922070

VL - 32

SP - 267

EP - 280

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

IS - 3

ER -