Appraisal of the comparative utility of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in the diagnosis of childhood round cell tumors

Gary W. Mierau, P. J. Berry, Richelle Malott, Douglas Weeks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To provide an objective assessment of the comparative utility of fluorescence- and peroxidase-based immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, an observer blinded study was conducted under realistic study conditions utilizing a large sampling of poorly differentiated pediatric round cell tumors. Working independently, using a single ancillary technique of particular expertise, each of three investigators attempted to render a specific diagnosis with regard to 50 diagnostically challenging tumors. The results were compared against the subsequent 'file diagnosis' established by consensus with all relevant information made available. A grading scheme was applied wherein points were awarded based on the accuracy and confidence of diagnosis. A comparative efficiency rating, expressed as a percentage, was formulated by dividing the number of points awarded each technique by the total number of points theoretically available. Electron microscopy proved superior overall, with an efficiency rating of 89%. Immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence studies yielded efficiency ratings of 71 and 61%, respectively. Used in combination, the techniques achieved an efficiency rating of 95%. Application of these ancillary techniques resulted in a revision of the provisional diagnosis in 11 of 50 cases, and left only two cases without a firm specific diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)507-517
Number of pages11
JournalUltrastructural Pathology
Volume20
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electron microscopy
ratings
Tumors
electron microscopy
Electron Microscopy
tumors
Immunohistochemistry
microscopy
cells
Neoplasms
Pediatrics
files
Peroxidase
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
confidence
Fluorescence
sampling
Research Personnel
Sampling
fluorescence

Keywords

  • Childhood
  • Comparative study
  • Electron microscopy
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Instrumentation
  • Structural Biology

Cite this

Appraisal of the comparative utility of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in the diagnosis of childhood round cell tumors. / Mierau, Gary W.; Berry, P. J.; Malott, Richelle; Weeks, Douglas.

In: Ultrastructural Pathology, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1996, p. 507-517.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5731b296b20c49748e90001ddd8c8f6e,
title = "Appraisal of the comparative utility of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in the diagnosis of childhood round cell tumors",
abstract = "To provide an objective assessment of the comparative utility of fluorescence- and peroxidase-based immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, an observer blinded study was conducted under realistic study conditions utilizing a large sampling of poorly differentiated pediatric round cell tumors. Working independently, using a single ancillary technique of particular expertise, each of three investigators attempted to render a specific diagnosis with regard to 50 diagnostically challenging tumors. The results were compared against the subsequent 'file diagnosis' established by consensus with all relevant information made available. A grading scheme was applied wherein points were awarded based on the accuracy and confidence of diagnosis. A comparative efficiency rating, expressed as a percentage, was formulated by dividing the number of points awarded each technique by the total number of points theoretically available. Electron microscopy proved superior overall, with an efficiency rating of 89{\%}. Immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence studies yielded efficiency ratings of 71 and 61{\%}, respectively. Used in combination, the techniques achieved an efficiency rating of 95{\%}. Application of these ancillary techniques resulted in a revision of the provisional diagnosis in 11 of 50 cases, and left only two cases without a firm specific diagnosis.",
keywords = "Childhood, Comparative study, Electron microscopy, Immunohistochemistry, Neoplasms",
author = "Mierau, {Gary W.} and Berry, {P. J.} and Richelle Malott and Douglas Weeks",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "507--517",
journal = "Ultrastructural Pathology",
issn = "0191-3123",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appraisal of the comparative utility of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in the diagnosis of childhood round cell tumors

AU - Mierau, Gary W.

AU - Berry, P. J.

AU - Malott, Richelle

AU - Weeks, Douglas

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - To provide an objective assessment of the comparative utility of fluorescence- and peroxidase-based immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, an observer blinded study was conducted under realistic study conditions utilizing a large sampling of poorly differentiated pediatric round cell tumors. Working independently, using a single ancillary technique of particular expertise, each of three investigators attempted to render a specific diagnosis with regard to 50 diagnostically challenging tumors. The results were compared against the subsequent 'file diagnosis' established by consensus with all relevant information made available. A grading scheme was applied wherein points were awarded based on the accuracy and confidence of diagnosis. A comparative efficiency rating, expressed as a percentage, was formulated by dividing the number of points awarded each technique by the total number of points theoretically available. Electron microscopy proved superior overall, with an efficiency rating of 89%. Immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence studies yielded efficiency ratings of 71 and 61%, respectively. Used in combination, the techniques achieved an efficiency rating of 95%. Application of these ancillary techniques resulted in a revision of the provisional diagnosis in 11 of 50 cases, and left only two cases without a firm specific diagnosis.

AB - To provide an objective assessment of the comparative utility of fluorescence- and peroxidase-based immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, an observer blinded study was conducted under realistic study conditions utilizing a large sampling of poorly differentiated pediatric round cell tumors. Working independently, using a single ancillary technique of particular expertise, each of three investigators attempted to render a specific diagnosis with regard to 50 diagnostically challenging tumors. The results were compared against the subsequent 'file diagnosis' established by consensus with all relevant information made available. A grading scheme was applied wherein points were awarded based on the accuracy and confidence of diagnosis. A comparative efficiency rating, expressed as a percentage, was formulated by dividing the number of points awarded each technique by the total number of points theoretically available. Electron microscopy proved superior overall, with an efficiency rating of 89%. Immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence studies yielded efficiency ratings of 71 and 61%, respectively. Used in combination, the techniques achieved an efficiency rating of 95%. Application of these ancillary techniques resulted in a revision of the provisional diagnosis in 11 of 50 cases, and left only two cases without a firm specific diagnosis.

KW - Childhood

KW - Comparative study

KW - Electron microscopy

KW - Immunohistochemistry

KW - Neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029806976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029806976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 507

EP - 517

JO - Ultrastructural Pathology

JF - Ultrastructural Pathology

SN - 0191-3123

IS - 6

ER -