Applications and limitations of Forensic Biomechanics: A Bayesian perspective

Michael D. Freeman, Sean Kohles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Forensic Biomechanics is an analytic method intended for presentation in a court of law. The method consists of the reconstruction of an injury mechanism followed by a comparison between the injury risk of the mechanism and the injury tolerance of the individual. In recent years some courts have excluded such testimony based, in part, on the inability of experts to quantify the potential error of the methods they relied upon in reaching their conclusions. The application of Bayes' Law to a forensic test of truth in a disputed matter allows for quantification of the error inherent in the method through the conditioning of the pre-test probability of the test outcome with the true and false positive rate of the test. The result of the calculation is the Error Odds (OE) for the test, or the ratio of correct to incorrect tests. We present an Error Odds analysis of seven previously published case studies in Forensic Biomechanics as an illustration of the utility of the OE as a metric for admissibility of testimony in the courts, with a minimum Error Odds ratio of 10 proposed as a threshold. The results of our analysis yielded only 1 of 7 cases of applied Forensic Biomechanics that surpassed the threshold for admissible testimony of 10, with most the cases falling below an OE of 3. The results of the present study suggest that the forensic application of biomechanics is potentially fraught with error. We suggest that an Error Odds analysis be incorporated in Forensic Biomechanics as part of the analysis as a form of quality control and as demonstrable evidence of the accuracy of the methodology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-77
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Biomechanical Phenomena
testimony
Wounds and Injuries
Quality Control
legal usage
quality control
Odds Ratio
conditioning
quantification
tolerance
reconstruction
expert
Law
methodology
evidence

Keywords

  • Bayes' Law
  • Error Odds
  • Forensic Biomechanics
  • Forensic epidemiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Applications and limitations of Forensic Biomechanics : A Bayesian perspective. / Freeman, Michael D.; Kohles, Sean.

In: Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Vol. 17, No. 2, 02.2010, p. 67-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Freeman, Michael D. ; Kohles, Sean. / Applications and limitations of Forensic Biomechanics : A Bayesian perspective. In: Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 67-77.
@article{929579457b074296991cf8231ee23972,
title = "Applications and limitations of Forensic Biomechanics: A Bayesian perspective",
abstract = "Forensic Biomechanics is an analytic method intended for presentation in a court of law. The method consists of the reconstruction of an injury mechanism followed by a comparison between the injury risk of the mechanism and the injury tolerance of the individual. In recent years some courts have excluded such testimony based, in part, on the inability of experts to quantify the potential error of the methods they relied upon in reaching their conclusions. The application of Bayes' Law to a forensic test of truth in a disputed matter allows for quantification of the error inherent in the method through the conditioning of the pre-test probability of the test outcome with the true and false positive rate of the test. The result of the calculation is the Error Odds (OE) for the test, or the ratio of correct to incorrect tests. We present an Error Odds analysis of seven previously published case studies in Forensic Biomechanics as an illustration of the utility of the OE as a metric for admissibility of testimony in the courts, with a minimum Error Odds ratio of 10 proposed as a threshold. The results of our analysis yielded only 1 of 7 cases of applied Forensic Biomechanics that surpassed the threshold for admissible testimony of 10, with most the cases falling below an OE of 3. The results of the present study suggest that the forensic application of biomechanics is potentially fraught with error. We suggest that an Error Odds analysis be incorporated in Forensic Biomechanics as part of the analysis as a form of quality control and as demonstrable evidence of the accuracy of the methodology.",
keywords = "Bayes' Law, Error Odds, Forensic Biomechanics, Forensic epidemiology",
author = "Freeman, {Michael D.} and Sean Kohles",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jflm.2009.09.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "67--77",
journal = "Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine",
issn = "1752-928X",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applications and limitations of Forensic Biomechanics

T2 - A Bayesian perspective

AU - Freeman, Michael D.

AU - Kohles, Sean

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Forensic Biomechanics is an analytic method intended for presentation in a court of law. The method consists of the reconstruction of an injury mechanism followed by a comparison between the injury risk of the mechanism and the injury tolerance of the individual. In recent years some courts have excluded such testimony based, in part, on the inability of experts to quantify the potential error of the methods they relied upon in reaching their conclusions. The application of Bayes' Law to a forensic test of truth in a disputed matter allows for quantification of the error inherent in the method through the conditioning of the pre-test probability of the test outcome with the true and false positive rate of the test. The result of the calculation is the Error Odds (OE) for the test, or the ratio of correct to incorrect tests. We present an Error Odds analysis of seven previously published case studies in Forensic Biomechanics as an illustration of the utility of the OE as a metric for admissibility of testimony in the courts, with a minimum Error Odds ratio of 10 proposed as a threshold. The results of our analysis yielded only 1 of 7 cases of applied Forensic Biomechanics that surpassed the threshold for admissible testimony of 10, with most the cases falling below an OE of 3. The results of the present study suggest that the forensic application of biomechanics is potentially fraught with error. We suggest that an Error Odds analysis be incorporated in Forensic Biomechanics as part of the analysis as a form of quality control and as demonstrable evidence of the accuracy of the methodology.

AB - Forensic Biomechanics is an analytic method intended for presentation in a court of law. The method consists of the reconstruction of an injury mechanism followed by a comparison between the injury risk of the mechanism and the injury tolerance of the individual. In recent years some courts have excluded such testimony based, in part, on the inability of experts to quantify the potential error of the methods they relied upon in reaching their conclusions. The application of Bayes' Law to a forensic test of truth in a disputed matter allows for quantification of the error inherent in the method through the conditioning of the pre-test probability of the test outcome with the true and false positive rate of the test. The result of the calculation is the Error Odds (OE) for the test, or the ratio of correct to incorrect tests. We present an Error Odds analysis of seven previously published case studies in Forensic Biomechanics as an illustration of the utility of the OE as a metric for admissibility of testimony in the courts, with a minimum Error Odds ratio of 10 proposed as a threshold. The results of our analysis yielded only 1 of 7 cases of applied Forensic Biomechanics that surpassed the threshold for admissible testimony of 10, with most the cases falling below an OE of 3. The results of the present study suggest that the forensic application of biomechanics is potentially fraught with error. We suggest that an Error Odds analysis be incorporated in Forensic Biomechanics as part of the analysis as a form of quality control and as demonstrable evidence of the accuracy of the methodology.

KW - Bayes' Law

KW - Error Odds

KW - Forensic Biomechanics

KW - Forensic epidemiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73549113309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73549113309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jflm.2009.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jflm.2009.09.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 20129425

AN - SCOPUS:73549113309

VL - 17

SP - 67

EP - 77

JO - Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine

JF - Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine

SN - 1752-928X

IS - 2

ER -