Application of Appropriateness Criteria in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography

James N. Kirkpatrick, Bonnie Ky, Hind Rahmouni, Julio A. Chirinos, Steven A. Farmer, Anjali V. Fields, Jeffrey Ogbara, Karen M. Eberman, Victor A. Ferrari, Frank E. Silvestry, Martin G. Keane, Alexander R. Opotowsky, Martin St John Sutton, Susan E. Wiegers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Appropriateness criteria were applied to outpatient transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) studies. Methods: Indications were rated as appropriate, inappropriate, or unclassifiable, considering provider-stated indications, previous TTE studies, symptom changes, and patient-stated indications. Clinically important new or unexpected findings were recorded. Results: Of 368 TTE studies, 206 (56%) were appropriate, 31 (8%) were inappropriate, and 131 (35%) were unclassifiable. Appropriateness was not correlated with patient or provider demographics. In 288 cases with prior TTE studies, there were 92 (32%) important new findings and 63 (22%) unexpected findings, of which 20% were from inappropriately ordered and 31% from unclassifiable TTE studies. Appropriateness was not associated with new (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-3.18) or unexpected (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-3.52) findings. Provider type and level of training were not correlated with new or unexpected findings. Conclusions: Many indications for TTE studies were unclassifiable. A high percentage of inappropriately ordered TTE studies yielded important information. Care must be taken in judging the value of TTE studies solely on the basis of appropriateness criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-59
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Echocardiography
Outpatients
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Demography

Keywords

  • Appropriateness
  • Echocardiography
  • Outpatient

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Application of Appropriateness Criteria in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography. / Kirkpatrick, James N.; Ky, Bonnie; Rahmouni, Hind; Chirinos, Julio A.; Farmer, Steven A.; Fields, Anjali V.; Ogbara, Jeffrey; Eberman, Karen M.; Ferrari, Victor A.; Silvestry, Frank E.; Keane, Martin G.; Opotowsky, Alexander R.; Sutton, Martin St John; Wiegers, Susan E.

In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 53-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kirkpatrick, JN, Ky, B, Rahmouni, H, Chirinos, JA, Farmer, SA, Fields, AV, Ogbara, J, Eberman, KM, Ferrari, VA, Silvestry, FE, Keane, MG, Opotowsky, AR, Sutton, MSJ & Wiegers, SE 2009, 'Application of Appropriateness Criteria in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography', Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2008.10.020
Kirkpatrick, James N. ; Ky, Bonnie ; Rahmouni, Hind ; Chirinos, Julio A. ; Farmer, Steven A. ; Fields, Anjali V. ; Ogbara, Jeffrey ; Eberman, Karen M. ; Ferrari, Victor A. ; Silvestry, Frank E. ; Keane, Martin G. ; Opotowsky, Alexander R. ; Sutton, Martin St John ; Wiegers, Susan E. / Application of Appropriateness Criteria in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography. In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2009 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 53-59.
@article{6dc3a4716b9e49f782d1066211451c32,
title = "Application of Appropriateness Criteria in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography",
abstract = "Background: Appropriateness criteria were applied to outpatient transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) studies. Methods: Indications were rated as appropriate, inappropriate, or unclassifiable, considering provider-stated indications, previous TTE studies, symptom changes, and patient-stated indications. Clinically important new or unexpected findings were recorded. Results: Of 368 TTE studies, 206 (56{\%}) were appropriate, 31 (8{\%}) were inappropriate, and 131 (35{\%}) were unclassifiable. Appropriateness was not correlated with patient or provider demographics. In 288 cases with prior TTE studies, there were 92 (32{\%}) important new findings and 63 (22{\%}) unexpected findings, of which 20{\%} were from inappropriately ordered and 31{\%} from unclassifiable TTE studies. Appropriateness was not associated with new (odds ratio, 1.23; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.48-3.18) or unexpected (odds ratio, 1.15; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.38-3.52) findings. Provider type and level of training were not correlated with new or unexpected findings. Conclusions: Many indications for TTE studies were unclassifiable. A high percentage of inappropriately ordered TTE studies yielded important information. Care must be taken in judging the value of TTE studies solely on the basis of appropriateness criteria.",
keywords = "Appropriateness, Echocardiography, Outpatient",
author = "Kirkpatrick, {James N.} and Bonnie Ky and Hind Rahmouni and Chirinos, {Julio A.} and Farmer, {Steven A.} and Fields, {Anjali V.} and Jeffrey Ogbara and Eberman, {Karen M.} and Ferrari, {Victor A.} and Silvestry, {Frank E.} and Keane, {Martin G.} and Opotowsky, {Alexander R.} and Sutton, {Martin St John} and Wiegers, {Susan E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.echo.2008.10.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "53--59",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography",
issn = "0894-7317",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of Appropriateness Criteria in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography

AU - Kirkpatrick, James N.

AU - Ky, Bonnie

AU - Rahmouni, Hind

AU - Chirinos, Julio A.

AU - Farmer, Steven A.

AU - Fields, Anjali V.

AU - Ogbara, Jeffrey

AU - Eberman, Karen M.

AU - Ferrari, Victor A.

AU - Silvestry, Frank E.

AU - Keane, Martin G.

AU - Opotowsky, Alexander R.

AU - Sutton, Martin St John

AU - Wiegers, Susan E.

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Background: Appropriateness criteria were applied to outpatient transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) studies. Methods: Indications were rated as appropriate, inappropriate, or unclassifiable, considering provider-stated indications, previous TTE studies, symptom changes, and patient-stated indications. Clinically important new or unexpected findings were recorded. Results: Of 368 TTE studies, 206 (56%) were appropriate, 31 (8%) were inappropriate, and 131 (35%) were unclassifiable. Appropriateness was not correlated with patient or provider demographics. In 288 cases with prior TTE studies, there were 92 (32%) important new findings and 63 (22%) unexpected findings, of which 20% were from inappropriately ordered and 31% from unclassifiable TTE studies. Appropriateness was not associated with new (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-3.18) or unexpected (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-3.52) findings. Provider type and level of training were not correlated with new or unexpected findings. Conclusions: Many indications for TTE studies were unclassifiable. A high percentage of inappropriately ordered TTE studies yielded important information. Care must be taken in judging the value of TTE studies solely on the basis of appropriateness criteria.

AB - Background: Appropriateness criteria were applied to outpatient transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) studies. Methods: Indications were rated as appropriate, inappropriate, or unclassifiable, considering provider-stated indications, previous TTE studies, symptom changes, and patient-stated indications. Clinically important new or unexpected findings were recorded. Results: Of 368 TTE studies, 206 (56%) were appropriate, 31 (8%) were inappropriate, and 131 (35%) were unclassifiable. Appropriateness was not correlated with patient or provider demographics. In 288 cases with prior TTE studies, there were 92 (32%) important new findings and 63 (22%) unexpected findings, of which 20% were from inappropriately ordered and 31% from unclassifiable TTE studies. Appropriateness was not associated with new (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-3.18) or unexpected (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-3.52) findings. Provider type and level of training were not correlated with new or unexpected findings. Conclusions: Many indications for TTE studies were unclassifiable. A high percentage of inappropriately ordered TTE studies yielded important information. Care must be taken in judging the value of TTE studies solely on the basis of appropriateness criteria.

KW - Appropriateness

KW - Echocardiography

KW - Outpatient

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149091284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149091284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.echo.2008.10.020

DO - 10.1016/j.echo.2008.10.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 19131002

AN - SCOPUS:58149091284

VL - 22

SP - 53

EP - 59

JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

SN - 0894-7317

IS - 1

ER -