Anechoic stripe size influences accuracy of FAST examination interpretation

Oscar Ma, Gary Gaddis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Accurate and precise interpretations of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) findings are important factors in managing trauma patients. The objectives were to analyze the influence of anechoic stripe (AS) size on interpretation accuracy by emergency physicians (EPs) and to assess the precision of FAST examination interpretation as a function of EP FAST experience. Methods: A prospective comparison study of FAST examination interpretation by 11 emergency medicine faculty (FAC), nine community attending EPs (ATT), and nine senior emergency medicine residents (RES) was conducted; these physicians were then divided into more experienced and less experienced cohorts to assess precision. Participants interpreted video recordings of the four standard views from five FAST examinations (20 total video clips); each examination contained views with various AS sizes. Accuracy of FAST examination interpretation was calculated for each group stratified by size of AS. Precision (reproducibility) of FAST examination interpretation was assessed by calculating κ values. Results: With large, moderate, or no AS, no significant differences in accuracy were found between groups. For small AS, significant differences in accuracy were found between the ATT and RES groups and between the combined FAC + ATT group and the RES group. κ was good to excellent when the nth and the (n + 1)th experienced physicians in the more experienced cohort were compared. κ values reflected that the more experienced cohort was more precise than the less experienced cohort. Conclusions: AS size visible on FAST examinations and EP experience level with FAST examination interpretation exerted a significant influence on the interpretation accuracy of videotaped FAST examinations. In addition, precision was enhanced by increased EP experience with FAST.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-253
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ultrasonography
Wounds and Injuries
Physicians
Emergencies
Emergency Medicine
Video Recording
Surgical Instruments
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Hemoperitoneum
  • Trauma
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Anechoic stripe size influences accuracy of FAST examination interpretation. / Ma, Oscar; Gaddis, Gary.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 248-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f9e9133fe71d4420af27113f0893b7ec,
title = "Anechoic stripe size influences accuracy of FAST examination interpretation",
abstract = "Objectives: Accurate and precise interpretations of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) findings are important factors in managing trauma patients. The objectives were to analyze the influence of anechoic stripe (AS) size on interpretation accuracy by emergency physicians (EPs) and to assess the precision of FAST examination interpretation as a function of EP FAST experience. Methods: A prospective comparison study of FAST examination interpretation by 11 emergency medicine faculty (FAC), nine community attending EPs (ATT), and nine senior emergency medicine residents (RES) was conducted; these physicians were then divided into more experienced and less experienced cohorts to assess precision. Participants interpreted video recordings of the four standard views from five FAST examinations (20 total video clips); each examination contained views with various AS sizes. Accuracy of FAST examination interpretation was calculated for each group stratified by size of AS. Precision (reproducibility) of FAST examination interpretation was assessed by calculating κ values. Results: With large, moderate, or no AS, no significant differences in accuracy were found between groups. For small AS, significant differences in accuracy were found between the ATT and RES groups and between the combined FAC + ATT group and the RES group. κ was good to excellent when the nth and the (n + 1)th experienced physicians in the more experienced cohort were compared. κ values reflected that the more experienced cohort was more precise than the less experienced cohort. Conclusions: AS size visible on FAST examinations and EP experience level with FAST examination interpretation exerted a significant influence on the interpretation accuracy of videotaped FAST examinations. In addition, precision was enhanced by increased EP experience with FAST.",
keywords = "Hemoperitoneum, Trauma, Ultrasound",
author = "Oscar Ma and Gary Gaddis",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2005.09.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "248--253",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anechoic stripe size influences accuracy of FAST examination interpretation

AU - Ma, Oscar

AU - Gaddis, Gary

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Objectives: Accurate and precise interpretations of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) findings are important factors in managing trauma patients. The objectives were to analyze the influence of anechoic stripe (AS) size on interpretation accuracy by emergency physicians (EPs) and to assess the precision of FAST examination interpretation as a function of EP FAST experience. Methods: A prospective comparison study of FAST examination interpretation by 11 emergency medicine faculty (FAC), nine community attending EPs (ATT), and nine senior emergency medicine residents (RES) was conducted; these physicians were then divided into more experienced and less experienced cohorts to assess precision. Participants interpreted video recordings of the four standard views from five FAST examinations (20 total video clips); each examination contained views with various AS sizes. Accuracy of FAST examination interpretation was calculated for each group stratified by size of AS. Precision (reproducibility) of FAST examination interpretation was assessed by calculating κ values. Results: With large, moderate, or no AS, no significant differences in accuracy were found between groups. For small AS, significant differences in accuracy were found between the ATT and RES groups and between the combined FAC + ATT group and the RES group. κ was good to excellent when the nth and the (n + 1)th experienced physicians in the more experienced cohort were compared. κ values reflected that the more experienced cohort was more precise than the less experienced cohort. Conclusions: AS size visible on FAST examinations and EP experience level with FAST examination interpretation exerted a significant influence on the interpretation accuracy of videotaped FAST examinations. In addition, precision was enhanced by increased EP experience with FAST.

AB - Objectives: Accurate and precise interpretations of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) findings are important factors in managing trauma patients. The objectives were to analyze the influence of anechoic stripe (AS) size on interpretation accuracy by emergency physicians (EPs) and to assess the precision of FAST examination interpretation as a function of EP FAST experience. Methods: A prospective comparison study of FAST examination interpretation by 11 emergency medicine faculty (FAC), nine community attending EPs (ATT), and nine senior emergency medicine residents (RES) was conducted; these physicians were then divided into more experienced and less experienced cohorts to assess precision. Participants interpreted video recordings of the four standard views from five FAST examinations (20 total video clips); each examination contained views with various AS sizes. Accuracy of FAST examination interpretation was calculated for each group stratified by size of AS. Precision (reproducibility) of FAST examination interpretation was assessed by calculating κ values. Results: With large, moderate, or no AS, no significant differences in accuracy were found between groups. For small AS, significant differences in accuracy were found between the ATT and RES groups and between the combined FAC + ATT group and the RES group. κ was good to excellent when the nth and the (n + 1)th experienced physicians in the more experienced cohort were compared. κ values reflected that the more experienced cohort was more precise than the less experienced cohort. Conclusions: AS size visible on FAST examinations and EP experience level with FAST examination interpretation exerted a significant influence on the interpretation accuracy of videotaped FAST examinations. In addition, precision was enhanced by increased EP experience with FAST.

KW - Hemoperitoneum

KW - Trauma

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644513473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644513473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2005.09.012

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2005.09.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 16495421

AN - SCOPUS:33644513473

VL - 13

SP - 248

EP - 253

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 3

ER -