"and i think that we can fix it"

Mental models used in high-risk surgical decision making

Jacqueline M. Kruser, Kristen E. Pecanac, Karen Brasel, Zara Cooper, Nicole M. Steffens, Martin F. McKneally, Margaret L. Schwarze

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine how surgeons use the "fix-it" model to communicate with patients before high-risk operations. Background: The "fix-it" model characterizes disease as an isolated abnormality that can be restored to normal form and function through medical intervention. This mental model is familiar to patients and physicians, but it is ineffective for chronic conditions and treatments that cannot achieve normalcy. Overusemay lead to permissive decisionmaking favoring intervention. Efforts to improve surgical decision making will need to consider how mental models function in clinical practice, including "fix-it." Methods: We observed surgeons who routinely perform high-risk surgery during preoperative discussions with patients. We used qualitative content analysis to explore the use of "fix-it" in 48 audio-recorded conversations. Results: Surgeons used the "fix-it" model for 2 separate purposes during preoperative conversations: (1) as an explanatory tool to facilitate patient understanding of disease and surgery, and (2) as a deliberation framework to assist in decision making. Although surgeons commonly used "fix-it" as an explanatory model, surgeons explicitly discussed limitations of the "fix-it" model as an independent rationale for operating as they deliberated about the value of surgery. Conclusions: Although the use of "fix-it" is familiar for explaining medical information to patients, surgeons recognize that the model can be problematic for determining the value of an operation. Whether patients can transition between understanding how their disease is fixed with surgery to a subsequent deliberation about whether they should have surgery is unclear and may have broader implications for surgical decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)678-684
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume261
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Patient Transfer
Surgeons
Physicians
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Kruser, J. M., Pecanac, K. E., Brasel, K., Cooper, Z., Steffens, N. M., McKneally, M. F., & Schwarze, M. L. (2015). "and i think that we can fix it": Mental models used in high-risk surgical decision making. Annals of Surgery, 261(4), 678-684. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000714

"and i think that we can fix it" : Mental models used in high-risk surgical decision making. / Kruser, Jacqueline M.; Pecanac, Kristen E.; Brasel, Karen; Cooper, Zara; Steffens, Nicole M.; McKneally, Martin F.; Schwarze, Margaret L.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 261, No. 4, 01.04.2015, p. 678-684.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kruser, JM, Pecanac, KE, Brasel, K, Cooper, Z, Steffens, NM, McKneally, MF & Schwarze, ML 2015, '"and i think that we can fix it": Mental models used in high-risk surgical decision making', Annals of Surgery, vol. 261, no. 4, pp. 678-684. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000714
Kruser, Jacqueline M. ; Pecanac, Kristen E. ; Brasel, Karen ; Cooper, Zara ; Steffens, Nicole M. ; McKneally, Martin F. ; Schwarze, Margaret L. / "and i think that we can fix it" : Mental models used in high-risk surgical decision making. In: Annals of Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 261, No. 4. pp. 678-684.
@article{53cdeb8b5be84be69bd6b2d649c19ca6,
title = "{"}and i think that we can fix it{"}: Mental models used in high-risk surgical decision making",
abstract = "Objective: To examine how surgeons use the {"}fix-it{"} model to communicate with patients before high-risk operations. Background: The {"}fix-it{"} model characterizes disease as an isolated abnormality that can be restored to normal form and function through medical intervention. This mental model is familiar to patients and physicians, but it is ineffective for chronic conditions and treatments that cannot achieve normalcy. Overusemay lead to permissive decisionmaking favoring intervention. Efforts to improve surgical decision making will need to consider how mental models function in clinical practice, including {"}fix-it.{"} Methods: We observed surgeons who routinely perform high-risk surgery during preoperative discussions with patients. We used qualitative content analysis to explore the use of {"}fix-it{"} in 48 audio-recorded conversations. Results: Surgeons used the {"}fix-it{"} model for 2 separate purposes during preoperative conversations: (1) as an explanatory tool to facilitate patient understanding of disease and surgery, and (2) as a deliberation framework to assist in decision making. Although surgeons commonly used {"}fix-it{"} as an explanatory model, surgeons explicitly discussed limitations of the {"}fix-it{"} model as an independent rationale for operating as they deliberated about the value of surgery. Conclusions: Although the use of {"}fix-it{"} is familiar for explaining medical information to patients, surgeons recognize that the model can be problematic for determining the value of an operation. Whether patients can transition between understanding how their disease is fixed with surgery to a subsequent deliberation about whether they should have surgery is unclear and may have broader implications for surgical decision making.",
author = "Kruser, {Jacqueline M.} and Pecanac, {Kristen E.} and Karen Brasel and Zara Cooper and Steffens, {Nicole M.} and McKneally, {Martin F.} and Schwarze, {Margaret L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0000000000000714",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "261",
pages = "678--684",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "and i think that we can fix it"

T2 - Mental models used in high-risk surgical decision making

AU - Kruser, Jacqueline M.

AU - Pecanac, Kristen E.

AU - Brasel, Karen

AU - Cooper, Zara

AU - Steffens, Nicole M.

AU - McKneally, Martin F.

AU - Schwarze, Margaret L.

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Objective: To examine how surgeons use the "fix-it" model to communicate with patients before high-risk operations. Background: The "fix-it" model characterizes disease as an isolated abnormality that can be restored to normal form and function through medical intervention. This mental model is familiar to patients and physicians, but it is ineffective for chronic conditions and treatments that cannot achieve normalcy. Overusemay lead to permissive decisionmaking favoring intervention. Efforts to improve surgical decision making will need to consider how mental models function in clinical practice, including "fix-it." Methods: We observed surgeons who routinely perform high-risk surgery during preoperative discussions with patients. We used qualitative content analysis to explore the use of "fix-it" in 48 audio-recorded conversations. Results: Surgeons used the "fix-it" model for 2 separate purposes during preoperative conversations: (1) as an explanatory tool to facilitate patient understanding of disease and surgery, and (2) as a deliberation framework to assist in decision making. Although surgeons commonly used "fix-it" as an explanatory model, surgeons explicitly discussed limitations of the "fix-it" model as an independent rationale for operating as they deliberated about the value of surgery. Conclusions: Although the use of "fix-it" is familiar for explaining medical information to patients, surgeons recognize that the model can be problematic for determining the value of an operation. Whether patients can transition between understanding how their disease is fixed with surgery to a subsequent deliberation about whether they should have surgery is unclear and may have broader implications for surgical decision making.

AB - Objective: To examine how surgeons use the "fix-it" model to communicate with patients before high-risk operations. Background: The "fix-it" model characterizes disease as an isolated abnormality that can be restored to normal form and function through medical intervention. This mental model is familiar to patients and physicians, but it is ineffective for chronic conditions and treatments that cannot achieve normalcy. Overusemay lead to permissive decisionmaking favoring intervention. Efforts to improve surgical decision making will need to consider how mental models function in clinical practice, including "fix-it." Methods: We observed surgeons who routinely perform high-risk surgery during preoperative discussions with patients. We used qualitative content analysis to explore the use of "fix-it" in 48 audio-recorded conversations. Results: Surgeons used the "fix-it" model for 2 separate purposes during preoperative conversations: (1) as an explanatory tool to facilitate patient understanding of disease and surgery, and (2) as a deliberation framework to assist in decision making. Although surgeons commonly used "fix-it" as an explanatory model, surgeons explicitly discussed limitations of the "fix-it" model as an independent rationale for operating as they deliberated about the value of surgery. Conclusions: Although the use of "fix-it" is familiar for explaining medical information to patients, surgeons recognize that the model can be problematic for determining the value of an operation. Whether patients can transition between understanding how their disease is fixed with surgery to a subsequent deliberation about whether they should have surgery is unclear and may have broader implications for surgical decision making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937506106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937506106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000714

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000714

M3 - Article

VL - 261

SP - 678

EP - 684

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 4

ER -