Analyzing patterns of staining in immunohistochemical studies: Application to a study of prostate cancer recurrence

Ruth Etzioni, Sarah Hawley, Dean Billheimer, Lawrence D. True, Beatrice Knudsen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Immunohistochemical studies use antibodies to stain tissues with the goal of quantifying protein expression. However, protein expression is often heterogeneous resulting in variable degrees and patterns of staining. This problem is particularly acute in prostate cancer, where tumors are infiltrative and heterogeneous in nature. In this article, we introduce analytic approaches that explicitly consider both the frequency and intensity of tissue staining. Methods: Compositional data analysis is a technique used to analyze vectors of unit-sum proportions, such as those obtained from soil sample studies or species abundance surveys. We summarized specimen staining patterns by the proportion of cells staining at mild, moderate, and intense levels and used compositional data analysis to summarize and compare the resulting staining profiles. Results: In a study of Syndecan-1 staining patterns among 44 localized prostate cancer cases with Gleason score 7 disease, compositional data analysis did not detect a statistically significant difference between the staining patterns in recurrent (n = 22) versus nonrecurrent (n = 22) patients. Results indicated only modest increases in the proportion of cells staining at a moderate intensity in the recurrent group. In contrast, an analysis that compared quantitative scores across groups indicated a (borderline) significant increase in staining in the recurrent group (P = 0.05, t test). Conclusions: Compositional data analysis offers a novel analytic approach for immunohistochemical studies, providing greater insight into differences in staining patterns between groups, but possibly lower statistical power than existing, score-based methods. When appropriate, we recommend conducting a compositional data analysis in addition to a standard score-based analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1040-1046
Number of pages7
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Staining and Labeling
Recurrence
Syndecan-1
Neoplasm Grading
Proteins
Coloring Agents
Soil
Antibodies
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Analyzing patterns of staining in immunohistochemical studies : Application to a study of prostate cancer recurrence. / Etzioni, Ruth; Hawley, Sarah; Billheimer, Dean; True, Lawrence D.; Knudsen, Beatrice.

In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, Vol. 14, No. 5, 01.05.2005, p. 1040-1046.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Etzioni, Ruth ; Hawley, Sarah ; Billheimer, Dean ; True, Lawrence D. ; Knudsen, Beatrice. / Analyzing patterns of staining in immunohistochemical studies : Application to a study of prostate cancer recurrence. In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2005 ; Vol. 14, No. 5. pp. 1040-1046.
@article{56c70c03ac1a4dfaa787136cb21cc0da,
title = "Analyzing patterns of staining in immunohistochemical studies: Application to a study of prostate cancer recurrence",
abstract = "Background: Immunohistochemical studies use antibodies to stain tissues with the goal of quantifying protein expression. However, protein expression is often heterogeneous resulting in variable degrees and patterns of staining. This problem is particularly acute in prostate cancer, where tumors are infiltrative and heterogeneous in nature. In this article, we introduce analytic approaches that explicitly consider both the frequency and intensity of tissue staining. Methods: Compositional data analysis is a technique used to analyze vectors of unit-sum proportions, such as those obtained from soil sample studies or species abundance surveys. We summarized specimen staining patterns by the proportion of cells staining at mild, moderate, and intense levels and used compositional data analysis to summarize and compare the resulting staining profiles. Results: In a study of Syndecan-1 staining patterns among 44 localized prostate cancer cases with Gleason score 7 disease, compositional data analysis did not detect a statistically significant difference between the staining patterns in recurrent (n = 22) versus nonrecurrent (n = 22) patients. Results indicated only modest increases in the proportion of cells staining at a moderate intensity in the recurrent group. In contrast, an analysis that compared quantitative scores across groups indicated a (borderline) significant increase in staining in the recurrent group (P = 0.05, t test). Conclusions: Compositional data analysis offers a novel analytic approach for immunohistochemical studies, providing greater insight into differences in staining patterns between groups, but possibly lower statistical power than existing, score-based methods. When appropriate, we recommend conducting a compositional data analysis in addition to a standard score-based analysis.",
author = "Ruth Etzioni and Sarah Hawley and Dean Billheimer and True, {Lawrence D.} and Beatrice Knudsen",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0584",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "1040--1046",
journal = "Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention",
issn = "1055-9965",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analyzing patterns of staining in immunohistochemical studies

T2 - Application to a study of prostate cancer recurrence

AU - Etzioni, Ruth

AU - Hawley, Sarah

AU - Billheimer, Dean

AU - True, Lawrence D.

AU - Knudsen, Beatrice

PY - 2005/5/1

Y1 - 2005/5/1

N2 - Background: Immunohistochemical studies use antibodies to stain tissues with the goal of quantifying protein expression. However, protein expression is often heterogeneous resulting in variable degrees and patterns of staining. This problem is particularly acute in prostate cancer, where tumors are infiltrative and heterogeneous in nature. In this article, we introduce analytic approaches that explicitly consider both the frequency and intensity of tissue staining. Methods: Compositional data analysis is a technique used to analyze vectors of unit-sum proportions, such as those obtained from soil sample studies or species abundance surveys. We summarized specimen staining patterns by the proportion of cells staining at mild, moderate, and intense levels and used compositional data analysis to summarize and compare the resulting staining profiles. Results: In a study of Syndecan-1 staining patterns among 44 localized prostate cancer cases with Gleason score 7 disease, compositional data analysis did not detect a statistically significant difference between the staining patterns in recurrent (n = 22) versus nonrecurrent (n = 22) patients. Results indicated only modest increases in the proportion of cells staining at a moderate intensity in the recurrent group. In contrast, an analysis that compared quantitative scores across groups indicated a (borderline) significant increase in staining in the recurrent group (P = 0.05, t test). Conclusions: Compositional data analysis offers a novel analytic approach for immunohistochemical studies, providing greater insight into differences in staining patterns between groups, but possibly lower statistical power than existing, score-based methods. When appropriate, we recommend conducting a compositional data analysis in addition to a standard score-based analysis.

AB - Background: Immunohistochemical studies use antibodies to stain tissues with the goal of quantifying protein expression. However, protein expression is often heterogeneous resulting in variable degrees and patterns of staining. This problem is particularly acute in prostate cancer, where tumors are infiltrative and heterogeneous in nature. In this article, we introduce analytic approaches that explicitly consider both the frequency and intensity of tissue staining. Methods: Compositional data analysis is a technique used to analyze vectors of unit-sum proportions, such as those obtained from soil sample studies or species abundance surveys. We summarized specimen staining patterns by the proportion of cells staining at mild, moderate, and intense levels and used compositional data analysis to summarize and compare the resulting staining profiles. Results: In a study of Syndecan-1 staining patterns among 44 localized prostate cancer cases with Gleason score 7 disease, compositional data analysis did not detect a statistically significant difference between the staining patterns in recurrent (n = 22) versus nonrecurrent (n = 22) patients. Results indicated only modest increases in the proportion of cells staining at a moderate intensity in the recurrent group. In contrast, an analysis that compared quantitative scores across groups indicated a (borderline) significant increase in staining in the recurrent group (P = 0.05, t test). Conclusions: Compositional data analysis offers a novel analytic approach for immunohistochemical studies, providing greater insight into differences in staining patterns between groups, but possibly lower statistical power than existing, score-based methods. When appropriate, we recommend conducting a compositional data analysis in addition to a standard score-based analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18544379937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18544379937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0584

DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0584

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15894650

AN - SCOPUS:18544379937

VL - 14

SP - 1040

EP - 1046

JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

SN - 1055-9965

IS - 5

ER -