Analyzing "failure to rescue": Is this an opportunity for outcome improvement in cardiac surgery?

Haritha G. Reddy, Terry Shih, Michael J. Englesbe, Francis L. Shannon, Patricia F. Theurer, Morley A. Herbert, Gaetano Paone, Gail F. Bell, Richard L. Prager

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In the setting of a statewide quality collaborative approach to the review of cardiac surgical mortalities in intensive care units (ICUs), variations in complication-related outcomes became apparent. Utilizing "failure to rescue" methodology (FTR; the probability of death after a complication), we compared FTR rates after adult cardiac surgery in low, medium, and high mortality centers from a voluntary, 33-center quality collaborative. Methods: We identified 45,904 patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality who underwent cardiac surgery between 2006 and 2010. The 33 centers were ranked according to observed-to-expected ratios for mortality and were categorized into 3 equal groups. We then compared rates of complications and FTR. Results: Overall unadjusted mortality was 2.6%, ranging from 1.5% in the low-mortality group to 3.6% in the high group. The rate of 17 complications ranged from 19.1% in the low group to 22.9% in the high group while FTR rates were 6.6% in the low group, 10.4% in the medium group, and 13.5% in the high group (p < 0.001). The FTR rate was significantly better in the low mortality group for the majority of complications (11 of 17) with the most significant findings for cardiac arrest, dialysis, prolonged ventilation, and pneumonia. Conclusions: Low mortality hospitals have superior ability to rescue patients from complications after cardiac surgery procedures. Outcomes review incorporating a collaborative multi-hospital approach can provide an ideal opportunity to review processes that anticipate and manage complications in the ICU and help recognize and share "differentiators" in care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1976-1981
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume95
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thoracic Surgery
Mortality
Intensive Care Units
Hospital Mortality
Heart Arrest
Ventilation
Dialysis
Pneumonia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Reddy, H. G., Shih, T., Englesbe, M. J., Shannon, F. L., Theurer, P. F., Herbert, M. A., ... Prager, R. L. (2013). Analyzing "failure to rescue": Is this an opportunity for outcome improvement in cardiac surgery? Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 95(6), 1976-1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.027

Analyzing "failure to rescue" : Is this an opportunity for outcome improvement in cardiac surgery? / Reddy, Haritha G.; Shih, Terry; Englesbe, Michael J.; Shannon, Francis L.; Theurer, Patricia F.; Herbert, Morley A.; Paone, Gaetano; Bell, Gail F.; Prager, Richard L.

In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 95, No. 6, 01.06.2013, p. 1976-1981.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reddy, HG, Shih, T, Englesbe, MJ, Shannon, FL, Theurer, PF, Herbert, MA, Paone, G, Bell, GF & Prager, RL 2013, 'Analyzing "failure to rescue": Is this an opportunity for outcome improvement in cardiac surgery?', Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 1976-1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.027
Reddy, Haritha G. ; Shih, Terry ; Englesbe, Michael J. ; Shannon, Francis L. ; Theurer, Patricia F. ; Herbert, Morley A. ; Paone, Gaetano ; Bell, Gail F. ; Prager, Richard L. / Analyzing "failure to rescue" : Is this an opportunity for outcome improvement in cardiac surgery?. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 95, No. 6. pp. 1976-1981.
@article{568cf2deec164baab24f2c292b1ea422,
title = "Analyzing {"}failure to rescue{"}: Is this an opportunity for outcome improvement in cardiac surgery?",
abstract = "Background: In the setting of a statewide quality collaborative approach to the review of cardiac surgical mortalities in intensive care units (ICUs), variations in complication-related outcomes became apparent. Utilizing {"}failure to rescue{"} methodology (FTR; the probability of death after a complication), we compared FTR rates after adult cardiac surgery in low, medium, and high mortality centers from a voluntary, 33-center quality collaborative. Methods: We identified 45,904 patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality who underwent cardiac surgery between 2006 and 2010. The 33 centers were ranked according to observed-to-expected ratios for mortality and were categorized into 3 equal groups. We then compared rates of complications and FTR. Results: Overall unadjusted mortality was 2.6{\%}, ranging from 1.5{\%} in the low-mortality group to 3.6{\%} in the high group. The rate of 17 complications ranged from 19.1{\%} in the low group to 22.9{\%} in the high group while FTR rates were 6.6{\%} in the low group, 10.4{\%} in the medium group, and 13.5{\%} in the high group (p < 0.001). The FTR rate was significantly better in the low mortality group for the majority of complications (11 of 17) with the most significant findings for cardiac arrest, dialysis, prolonged ventilation, and pneumonia. Conclusions: Low mortality hospitals have superior ability to rescue patients from complications after cardiac surgery procedures. Outcomes review incorporating a collaborative multi-hospital approach can provide an ideal opportunity to review processes that anticipate and manage complications in the ICU and help recognize and share {"}differentiators{"} in care.",
author = "Reddy, {Haritha G.} and Terry Shih and Englesbe, {Michael J.} and Shannon, {Francis L.} and Theurer, {Patricia F.} and Herbert, {Morley A.} and Gaetano Paone and Bell, {Gail F.} and Prager, {Richard L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "1976--1981",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analyzing "failure to rescue"

T2 - Is this an opportunity for outcome improvement in cardiac surgery?

AU - Reddy, Haritha G.

AU - Shih, Terry

AU - Englesbe, Michael J.

AU - Shannon, Francis L.

AU - Theurer, Patricia F.

AU - Herbert, Morley A.

AU - Paone, Gaetano

AU - Bell, Gail F.

AU - Prager, Richard L.

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - Background: In the setting of a statewide quality collaborative approach to the review of cardiac surgical mortalities in intensive care units (ICUs), variations in complication-related outcomes became apparent. Utilizing "failure to rescue" methodology (FTR; the probability of death after a complication), we compared FTR rates after adult cardiac surgery in low, medium, and high mortality centers from a voluntary, 33-center quality collaborative. Methods: We identified 45,904 patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality who underwent cardiac surgery between 2006 and 2010. The 33 centers were ranked according to observed-to-expected ratios for mortality and were categorized into 3 equal groups. We then compared rates of complications and FTR. Results: Overall unadjusted mortality was 2.6%, ranging from 1.5% in the low-mortality group to 3.6% in the high group. The rate of 17 complications ranged from 19.1% in the low group to 22.9% in the high group while FTR rates were 6.6% in the low group, 10.4% in the medium group, and 13.5% in the high group (p < 0.001). The FTR rate was significantly better in the low mortality group for the majority of complications (11 of 17) with the most significant findings for cardiac arrest, dialysis, prolonged ventilation, and pneumonia. Conclusions: Low mortality hospitals have superior ability to rescue patients from complications after cardiac surgery procedures. Outcomes review incorporating a collaborative multi-hospital approach can provide an ideal opportunity to review processes that anticipate and manage complications in the ICU and help recognize and share "differentiators" in care.

AB - Background: In the setting of a statewide quality collaborative approach to the review of cardiac surgical mortalities in intensive care units (ICUs), variations in complication-related outcomes became apparent. Utilizing "failure to rescue" methodology (FTR; the probability of death after a complication), we compared FTR rates after adult cardiac surgery in low, medium, and high mortality centers from a voluntary, 33-center quality collaborative. Methods: We identified 45,904 patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality who underwent cardiac surgery between 2006 and 2010. The 33 centers were ranked according to observed-to-expected ratios for mortality and were categorized into 3 equal groups. We then compared rates of complications and FTR. Results: Overall unadjusted mortality was 2.6%, ranging from 1.5% in the low-mortality group to 3.6% in the high group. The rate of 17 complications ranged from 19.1% in the low group to 22.9% in the high group while FTR rates were 6.6% in the low group, 10.4% in the medium group, and 13.5% in the high group (p < 0.001). The FTR rate was significantly better in the low mortality group for the majority of complications (11 of 17) with the most significant findings for cardiac arrest, dialysis, prolonged ventilation, and pneumonia. Conclusions: Low mortality hospitals have superior ability to rescue patients from complications after cardiac surgery procedures. Outcomes review incorporating a collaborative multi-hospital approach can provide an ideal opportunity to review processes that anticipate and manage complications in the ICU and help recognize and share "differentiators" in care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878220701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878220701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.027

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 23642682

AN - SCOPUS:84878220701

VL - 95

SP - 1976

EP - 1981

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 6

ER -