Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging

Chris L. Coleman, Timothy Svec, Monty R. Rieger, John A. Suchina, M. Michael Wang, Gerald N. Glickman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared step-back preparations in curved canals using nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) K-files and stainless steel K-files. Forty canals in mesial roots of mandibular molars were embedded in casting resin and cross-sectioned at three levels: 1 to 2 mm from the apical foramen, middle of the curve, and coronal. Direct digital computer images were recorded before and after instrumentation. Superimposition of the images combined with digital subtraction computer software allowed direct measurement of area instrumented, distance of transportation, and shape analysis. The computer software calculated absolute center of gravity for each image analyzed to get a full 360-degree interpretation of the canal transport. Time of instrumentation was recorded. Results showed Ni-Ti files to cause significantly less transportation and remain more centered at the apical level (p <0.05). Area removed by Ni-Ti and stainless steel files was not significantly different (p <0.05). Time of instrumentation was not significantly different for Ni-Ti and stainless steel instruments (p <0.05). Cross-sectional shape of the instrumented canal was not significantly different (p <0.05).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)603-607
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume22
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stainless Steel
Software
Tooth Apex
Gravitation
nitinol

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Coleman, C. L., Svec, T., Rieger, M. R., Suchina, J. A., Wang, M. M., & Glickman, G. N. (1996). Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging. Journal of Endodontics, 22(11), 603-607.

Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging. / Coleman, Chris L.; Svec, Timothy; Rieger, Monty R.; Suchina, John A.; Wang, M. Michael; Glickman, Gerald N.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 22, No. 11, 1996, p. 603-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coleman, CL, Svec, T, Rieger, MR, Suchina, JA, Wang, MM & Glickman, GN 1996, 'Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging', Journal of Endodontics, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 603-607.
Coleman CL, Svec T, Rieger MR, Suchina JA, Wang MM, Glickman GN. Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging. Journal of Endodontics. 1996;22(11):603-607.
Coleman, Chris L. ; Svec, Timothy ; Rieger, Monty R. ; Suchina, John A. ; Wang, M. Michael ; Glickman, Gerald N. / Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging. In: Journal of Endodontics. 1996 ; Vol. 22, No. 11. pp. 603-607.
@article{6dc5434240ba420eb34b3a66a061b78a,
title = "Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging",
abstract = "This study compared step-back preparations in curved canals using nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) K-files and stainless steel K-files. Forty canals in mesial roots of mandibular molars were embedded in casting resin and cross-sectioned at three levels: 1 to 2 mm from the apical foramen, middle of the curve, and coronal. Direct digital computer images were recorded before and after instrumentation. Superimposition of the images combined with digital subtraction computer software allowed direct measurement of area instrumented, distance of transportation, and shape analysis. The computer software calculated absolute center of gravity for each image analyzed to get a full 360-degree interpretation of the canal transport. Time of instrumentation was recorded. Results showed Ni-Ti files to cause significantly less transportation and remain more centered at the apical level (p <0.05). Area removed by Ni-Ti and stainless steel files was not significantly different (p <0.05). Time of instrumentation was not significantly different for Ni-Ti and stainless steel instruments (p <0.05). Cross-sectional shape of the instrumented canal was not significantly different (p <0.05).",
author = "Coleman, {Chris L.} and Timothy Svec and Rieger, {Monty R.} and Suchina, {John A.} and Wang, {M. Michael} and Glickman, {Gerald N.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "603--607",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging

AU - Coleman, Chris L.

AU - Svec, Timothy

AU - Rieger, Monty R.

AU - Suchina, John A.

AU - Wang, M. Michael

AU - Glickman, Gerald N.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - This study compared step-back preparations in curved canals using nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) K-files and stainless steel K-files. Forty canals in mesial roots of mandibular molars were embedded in casting resin and cross-sectioned at three levels: 1 to 2 mm from the apical foramen, middle of the curve, and coronal. Direct digital computer images were recorded before and after instrumentation. Superimposition of the images combined with digital subtraction computer software allowed direct measurement of area instrumented, distance of transportation, and shape analysis. The computer software calculated absolute center of gravity for each image analyzed to get a full 360-degree interpretation of the canal transport. Time of instrumentation was recorded. Results showed Ni-Ti files to cause significantly less transportation and remain more centered at the apical level (p <0.05). Area removed by Ni-Ti and stainless steel files was not significantly different (p <0.05). Time of instrumentation was not significantly different for Ni-Ti and stainless steel instruments (p <0.05). Cross-sectional shape of the instrumented canal was not significantly different (p <0.05).

AB - This study compared step-back preparations in curved canals using nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) K-files and stainless steel K-files. Forty canals in mesial roots of mandibular molars were embedded in casting resin and cross-sectioned at three levels: 1 to 2 mm from the apical foramen, middle of the curve, and coronal. Direct digital computer images were recorded before and after instrumentation. Superimposition of the images combined with digital subtraction computer software allowed direct measurement of area instrumented, distance of transportation, and shape analysis. The computer software calculated absolute center of gravity for each image analyzed to get a full 360-degree interpretation of the canal transport. Time of instrumentation was recorded. Results showed Ni-Ti files to cause significantly less transportation and remain more centered at the apical level (p <0.05). Area removed by Ni-Ti and stainless steel files was not significantly different (p <0.05). Time of instrumentation was not significantly different for Ni-Ti and stainless steel instruments (p <0.05). Cross-sectional shape of the instrumented canal was not significantly different (p <0.05).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030275477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030275477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 603

EP - 607

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 11

ER -