Anabolic steroid education and adolescents: Do scare tactics work?

L. Goldberg, R. Bents, E. Bosworth, L. Trevisan, D. L. Elliot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Scopus citations

Abstract

The opinions (level of agreement) of high school varsity football players with regard to reported effects of anabolic steroids were assessed before and after two different education interventions. Lectures and handouts of a balanced education program (potential risks and benefits) were compared with a risks-only (negative or 'scare tactics') presentation, in a controlled manner. Those receiving the balanced review significantly increased their agreement with 5 of 10 targeted adverse effects, while no change occurred for any risks among those taught by the negative intervention. A teaching model that only emphasizes the untoward consequences of anabolic steroids is ineffective, even in the short-term. A balanced education approach can improve understanding of the potential adverse effects of these drugs. Additional strategies may be required to change young athletes' attitudes toward anabolic androgenic steroid use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-286
Number of pages4
JournalPediatrics
Volume87
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Keywords

  • adolescents
  • anabolic steroids
  • athletes
  • education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Anabolic steroid education and adolescents: Do scare tactics work?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Goldberg, L., Bents, R., Bosworth, E., Trevisan, L., & Elliot, D. L. (1991). Anabolic steroid education and adolescents: Do scare tactics work? Pediatrics, 87(3), 283-286.