An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a two-frequency (Root ZX) and a five-frequency (Endo Analyzer Model 8005) electronic apex locator under clinical conditions. Thirty-two teeth planned for extraction were used. The coronal portion of each canal was flared using Gates Glidden drills and Orifice Shapers. The canals were irrigated with 2.6% sodium hypochlorite. A K-type file was used to determine a separate working length in each canal using the electronic apex locators. The teeth were extracted and the apical 4 mm of each root canal was exposed along the long axis of the tooth. Photographic slides of each canal were projected and the file position in relation to the minor diameter was determined by two investigators. The mean distance between the electronic apex locator working length and minor diameter was 1.03 mm for the Endo Analyzer and 0.19 mm for the Root ZX. A paired sample t test showed that the Endo Analyzer had significantly longer readings beyond the minor diameter than the Root ZX (p <0.0001). The ability to locate the minor diameter (± 0.5 mm) was 90.7% for the Root ZX and 34.4% for the Endo Analyzer Model 8005.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)497-500
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume29
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 2003

Fingerprint

Tooth
Sodium Hypochlorite
Tooth Extraction
Mandrillus
Dental Pulp Cavity
Reading
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators. / Welk, Aaron R.; Baumgartner, John (Craig); Marshall, J (Gordon).

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 29, No. 8, 08.2003, p. 497-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{433a2be1b3ce4c1997f5562b08930d94,
title = "An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a two-frequency (Root ZX) and a five-frequency (Endo Analyzer Model 8005) electronic apex locator under clinical conditions. Thirty-two teeth planned for extraction were used. The coronal portion of each canal was flared using Gates Glidden drills and Orifice Shapers. The canals were irrigated with 2.6{\%} sodium hypochlorite. A K-type file was used to determine a separate working length in each canal using the electronic apex locators. The teeth were extracted and the apical 4 mm of each root canal was exposed along the long axis of the tooth. Photographic slides of each canal were projected and the file position in relation to the minor diameter was determined by two investigators. The mean distance between the electronic apex locator working length and minor diameter was 1.03 mm for the Endo Analyzer and 0.19 mm for the Root ZX. A paired sample t test showed that the Endo Analyzer had significantly longer readings beyond the minor diameter than the Root ZX (p <0.0001). The ability to locate the minor diameter (± 0.5 mm) was 90.7{\%} for the Root ZX and 34.4{\%} for the Endo Analyzer Model 8005.",
author = "Welk, {Aaron R.} and Baumgartner, {John (Craig)} and Marshall, {J (Gordon)}",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "497--500",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators

AU - Welk, Aaron R.

AU - Baumgartner, John (Craig)

AU - Marshall, J (Gordon)

PY - 2003/8

Y1 - 2003/8

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a two-frequency (Root ZX) and a five-frequency (Endo Analyzer Model 8005) electronic apex locator under clinical conditions. Thirty-two teeth planned for extraction were used. The coronal portion of each canal was flared using Gates Glidden drills and Orifice Shapers. The canals were irrigated with 2.6% sodium hypochlorite. A K-type file was used to determine a separate working length in each canal using the electronic apex locators. The teeth were extracted and the apical 4 mm of each root canal was exposed along the long axis of the tooth. Photographic slides of each canal were projected and the file position in relation to the minor diameter was determined by two investigators. The mean distance between the electronic apex locator working length and minor diameter was 1.03 mm for the Endo Analyzer and 0.19 mm for the Root ZX. A paired sample t test showed that the Endo Analyzer had significantly longer readings beyond the minor diameter than the Root ZX (p <0.0001). The ability to locate the minor diameter (± 0.5 mm) was 90.7% for the Root ZX and 34.4% for the Endo Analyzer Model 8005.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a two-frequency (Root ZX) and a five-frequency (Endo Analyzer Model 8005) electronic apex locator under clinical conditions. Thirty-two teeth planned for extraction were used. The coronal portion of each canal was flared using Gates Glidden drills and Orifice Shapers. The canals were irrigated with 2.6% sodium hypochlorite. A K-type file was used to determine a separate working length in each canal using the electronic apex locators. The teeth were extracted and the apical 4 mm of each root canal was exposed along the long axis of the tooth. Photographic slides of each canal were projected and the file position in relation to the minor diameter was determined by two investigators. The mean distance between the electronic apex locator working length and minor diameter was 1.03 mm for the Endo Analyzer and 0.19 mm for the Root ZX. A paired sample t test showed that the Endo Analyzer had significantly longer readings beyond the minor diameter than the Root ZX (p <0.0001). The ability to locate the minor diameter (± 0.5 mm) was 90.7% for the Root ZX and 34.4% for the Endo Analyzer Model 8005.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142010031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142010031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12929694

AN - SCOPUS:0142010031

VL - 29

SP - 497

EP - 500

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 8

ER -