An alternative approach to histopathological validation of PET imaging for radiation therapy image-guidance: A proof of concept

Marian Axente, Jun He, Christopher P. Bass, Gobalakrishnan Sundaresan, Jamal Zweit, Jeffrey F. Williamson, Andrei Pugachev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose In radiotherapy, PET images can be used to guide the delivery of selectively escalated doses to biologically relevant tumour subvolumes. Validation of PET for such applications requires demonstration of spatial coincidence between PET tracer uptake pattern and the histopathologically confirmed target. This study introduces a novel approach to histopathological validation of PET image segmentation for radiotherapy guidance. Methods and materials Sequential tissue sections from surgically excised whole-tumour specimens were used to acquire full 3D-sets of both histopathological images (microscopy) and PET tracer distribution images (autoradiography). After these datasets were accurately registered, a full 3D autoradiographic distribution of PET tracer was reconstructed and used to obtain synthetic PET images (sPET) by simulating the image deterioration induced by processes involved in PET image formation. To illustrate the method, sPET images were used in this study to investigate spatial coincidence between high FDG uptake areas and the distribution of viable tissue in two small animal tumour models. Results The reconstructed 3D autoradiographic distribution of the PET tracer was spatially coherent, as indicated by the high average value of the normalised pixel-by-pixel correlation of intensities between successive slices (0.84 ± 0.05 and 0.94 ± 0.02). The loss of detail in the sPET images versus the 3D autoradiography was significant as indicated by Dice coefficient values corresponding to the two tumours (0 and 0.1 at 70% threshold). The maximum overlap between the FDG segmented volumes and the extent of the viable tissue as indicated by Dice coefficient values, was 0.8 for one tumour (for the image thresholded at 22% of max intensity) and 0.88 for the other (threshold of 14% of max intensity). Conclusion It was demonstrated that the use of synthetic PET images for histopathological validation allows for bypassing a technically challenging and error-prone step of registering non-invasive PET images with histopathology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-316
Number of pages8
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume110
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Histopathological validation
  • Image-guidance
  • PET
  • Small-animal imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this