TY - JOUR
T1 - Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain
AU - Billings, Curtis J.
AU - Tremblay, Kelly L.
AU - Miller, Christi W.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank Pamela Souza for helpful discussions about these data, and Wendy Tolin for assistance with data processing. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health through the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, and the Department of Veterans Affairs through the Rehabilitation Research and Development Service [F31-DC007296 and C6971M (CJB); R01-DC007705 (KLT); P30-DC004661].
PY - 2011/7
Y1 - 2011/7
N2 - Objective: There is interest in using cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to evaluate hearing aid fittings and experience-related plasticity associated with amplification; however, little is known about hearing aid signal processing effects on these responses. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of clinically relevant hearing aid gain settings, and the resulting in-the-canal signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), on the latency and amplitude of P1, N1, and P2 waves. Design & Sample: Evoked potentials and in-the-canal acoustic measures were recorded in nine normal-hearing adults in unaided and aided conditions. In the aided condition, a 40-dB signal was delivered to a hearing aid programmed to provide four levels of gain (0, 10, 20, and 30 dB). As a control, unaided stimulus levels were matched to aided condition outputs (i.e. 40, 50, 60, and 70 dB) for comparison purposes. Results: When signal levels are defined in terms of output level, aided CAEPs were surprisingly smaller and delayed relative to unaided CAEPs, probably resulting from increases to noise levels caused by the hearing aid. Discussion: These results reinforce the notion that hearing aids modify stimulus characteristics such as SNR, which in turn affects the CAEP in a way that does not reliably reflect hearing aid gain.
AB - Objective: There is interest in using cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to evaluate hearing aid fittings and experience-related plasticity associated with amplification; however, little is known about hearing aid signal processing effects on these responses. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of clinically relevant hearing aid gain settings, and the resulting in-the-canal signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), on the latency and amplitude of P1, N1, and P2 waves. Design & Sample: Evoked potentials and in-the-canal acoustic measures were recorded in nine normal-hearing adults in unaided and aided conditions. In the aided condition, a 40-dB signal was delivered to a hearing aid programmed to provide four levels of gain (0, 10, 20, and 30 dB). As a control, unaided stimulus levels were matched to aided condition outputs (i.e. 40, 50, 60, and 70 dB) for comparison purposes. Results: When signal levels are defined in terms of output level, aided CAEPs were surprisingly smaller and delayed relative to unaided CAEPs, probably resulting from increases to noise levels caused by the hearing aid. Discussion: These results reinforce the notion that hearing aids modify stimulus characteristics such as SNR, which in turn affects the CAEP in a way that does not reliably reflect hearing aid gain.
KW - Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs); Event-related potentials (ERPs); Signals in noise; Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); N1; Auditory cortex; Hearing aids; Amplification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958775226&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958775226&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/14992027.2011.568011
DO - 10.3109/14992027.2011.568011
M3 - Article
C2 - 21486122
AN - SCOPUS:79958775226
SN - 1499-2027
VL - 50
SP - 459
EP - 467
JO - International Journal of Audiology
JF - International Journal of Audiology
IS - 7
ER -