AHRQ Series Paper 3

Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care program

Evelyn P. Whitlock, Sarah A. Lopez, Stephanie Chang, Mark Helfand, Michelle Eder, Nicole Floyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This article discusses the identification, selection, and refinement of topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews within the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Effective Health Care (EHC) program. Study Design and Setting: The EHC program seeks to align its research topic selection with the overall goals of the program, impartially and consistently apply predefined criteria to potential topics, involve stakeholders to identify high-priority topics, be transparent and accountable, and continually evaluate and improve processes. Results: A topic prioritization group representing stakeholder and scientific perspectives evaluates topic nominations that fit within the EHC program (are "appropriate") to determine how "important" topics are as considered against seven criteria. The group then judges whether a new comparative effectiveness systematic review would be a duplication of existing research syntheses, and if not duplicative, if there is adequate type and volume of research to conduct a new systematic review. Finally, the group considers the "potential value and impact" of a comparative effectiveness systematic review. Conclusion: As the EHC program develops, ongoing challenges include ensuring the program addresses truly unmet needs for synthesized research because national and international efforts in this arena are uncoordinated, as well as engaging a range of stakeholders in program decisions while also achieving efficiency and timeliness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-501
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume63
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Research
Quality of Health Care
Health Services Research

Keywords

  • Comparative effectiveness
  • Decision making
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Methods
  • Priority setting
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

AHRQ Series Paper 3 : Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care program. / Whitlock, Evelyn P.; Lopez, Sarah A.; Chang, Stephanie; Helfand, Mark; Eder, Michelle; Floyd, Nicole.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 63, No. 5, 05.2010, p. 491-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d8715e2f3994f55960ae18783cdc0ef,
title = "AHRQ Series Paper 3: Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care program",
abstract = "Objective: This article discusses the identification, selection, and refinement of topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews within the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Effective Health Care (EHC) program. Study Design and Setting: The EHC program seeks to align its research topic selection with the overall goals of the program, impartially and consistently apply predefined criteria to potential topics, involve stakeholders to identify high-priority topics, be transparent and accountable, and continually evaluate and improve processes. Results: A topic prioritization group representing stakeholder and scientific perspectives evaluates topic nominations that fit within the EHC program (are {"}appropriate{"}) to determine how {"}important{"} topics are as considered against seven criteria. The group then judges whether a new comparative effectiveness systematic review would be a duplication of existing research syntheses, and if not duplicative, if there is adequate type and volume of research to conduct a new systematic review. Finally, the group considers the {"}potential value and impact{"} of a comparative effectiveness systematic review. Conclusion: As the EHC program develops, ongoing challenges include ensuring the program addresses truly unmet needs for synthesized research because national and international efforts in this arena are uncoordinated, as well as engaging a range of stakeholders in program decisions while also achieving efficiency and timeliness.",
keywords = "Comparative effectiveness, Decision making, Evidence-based practice, Methods, Priority setting, Systematic review",
author = "Whitlock, {Evelyn P.} and Lopez, {Sarah A.} and Stephanie Chang and Mark Helfand and Michelle Eder and Nicole Floyd",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "491--501",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - AHRQ Series Paper 3

T2 - Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care program

AU - Whitlock, Evelyn P.

AU - Lopez, Sarah A.

AU - Chang, Stephanie

AU - Helfand, Mark

AU - Eder, Michelle

AU - Floyd, Nicole

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Objective: This article discusses the identification, selection, and refinement of topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews within the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Effective Health Care (EHC) program. Study Design and Setting: The EHC program seeks to align its research topic selection with the overall goals of the program, impartially and consistently apply predefined criteria to potential topics, involve stakeholders to identify high-priority topics, be transparent and accountable, and continually evaluate and improve processes. Results: A topic prioritization group representing stakeholder and scientific perspectives evaluates topic nominations that fit within the EHC program (are "appropriate") to determine how "important" topics are as considered against seven criteria. The group then judges whether a new comparative effectiveness systematic review would be a duplication of existing research syntheses, and if not duplicative, if there is adequate type and volume of research to conduct a new systematic review. Finally, the group considers the "potential value and impact" of a comparative effectiveness systematic review. Conclusion: As the EHC program develops, ongoing challenges include ensuring the program addresses truly unmet needs for synthesized research because national and international efforts in this arena are uncoordinated, as well as engaging a range of stakeholders in program decisions while also achieving efficiency and timeliness.

AB - Objective: This article discusses the identification, selection, and refinement of topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews within the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Effective Health Care (EHC) program. Study Design and Setting: The EHC program seeks to align its research topic selection with the overall goals of the program, impartially and consistently apply predefined criteria to potential topics, involve stakeholders to identify high-priority topics, be transparent and accountable, and continually evaluate and improve processes. Results: A topic prioritization group representing stakeholder and scientific perspectives evaluates topic nominations that fit within the EHC program (are "appropriate") to determine how "important" topics are as considered against seven criteria. The group then judges whether a new comparative effectiveness systematic review would be a duplication of existing research syntheses, and if not duplicative, if there is adequate type and volume of research to conduct a new systematic review. Finally, the group considers the "potential value and impact" of a comparative effectiveness systematic review. Conclusion: As the EHC program develops, ongoing challenges include ensuring the program addresses truly unmet needs for synthesized research because national and international efforts in this arena are uncoordinated, as well as engaging a range of stakeholders in program decisions while also achieving efficiency and timeliness.

KW - Comparative effectiveness

KW - Decision making

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Methods

KW - Priority setting

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949652318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949652318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.008

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 491

EP - 501

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 5

ER -