AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 3

Adapting frameworks to develop protocols

Mary Butler, Richard A. Epstein, Annette Totten, Evelyn P. Whitlock, Mohammed T. Ansari, Laura J. Damschroder, Ethan Balk, Eric B. Bass, Nancy D. Berkman, Susanne Hempel, Suchitra Iyer, Karen Schoelles, Jeanne-Marie Guise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Once a proposed topic has been identified for a systematic review and has undergone a question formulation stage, a protocol must be developed that specifies the scope and research questions in detail and outlines the methodology for conducting the systematic review. Rationale: Framework modifications are often needed to accommodate increased complexity. We describe and give examples of adaptations and alternatives to traditional analytic frameworks. Discussion: This article identifies and describes elements of frameworks and how they can be adapted to inform the protocol and conduct of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Modifications may be needed to adapt the population, intervention, comparators, and outcomes normally used in protocol development to successfully describe complex interventions; in some instances, alternative frameworks may be better suited. Possible approaches to analytic frameworks for complex interventions that illustrate causal and associative linkages are outlined, including time elements, which systematic reviews of complex interventions may need to address. The need for and specifics of the accommodations vary with details of a specific systematic review. This in turn helps determine whether traditional frameworks are sufficient, can be refined, or if alternate frameworks must be adopted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Research
Population

Keywords

  • Analytic frameworks
  • Complex interventions
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Research design
  • Review literature as topic
  • Systematic reviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 3 : Adapting frameworks to develop protocols. / Butler, Mary; Epstein, Richard A.; Totten, Annette; Whitlock, Evelyn P.; Ansari, Mohammed T.; Damschroder, Laura J.; Balk, Ethan; Bass, Eric B.; Berkman, Nancy D.; Hempel, Susanne; Iyer, Suchitra; Schoelles, Karen; Guise, Jeanne-Marie.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Butler, M, Epstein, RA, Totten, A, Whitlock, EP, Ansari, MT, Damschroder, LJ, Balk, E, Bass, EB, Berkman, ND, Hempel, S, Iyer, S, Schoelles, K & Guise, J-M 2017, 'AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 3: Adapting frameworks to develop protocols', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.013
Butler, Mary ; Epstein, Richard A. ; Totten, Annette ; Whitlock, Evelyn P. ; Ansari, Mohammed T. ; Damschroder, Laura J. ; Balk, Ethan ; Bass, Eric B. ; Berkman, Nancy D. ; Hempel, Susanne ; Iyer, Suchitra ; Schoelles, Karen ; Guise, Jeanne-Marie. / AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 3 : Adapting frameworks to develop protocols. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017.
@article{a4dd7ef690e740e1aefe31eb4d4bd9dd,
title = "AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 3: Adapting frameworks to develop protocols",
abstract = "Background: Once a proposed topic has been identified for a systematic review and has undergone a question formulation stage, a protocol must be developed that specifies the scope and research questions in detail and outlines the methodology for conducting the systematic review. Rationale: Framework modifications are often needed to accommodate increased complexity. We describe and give examples of adaptations and alternatives to traditional analytic frameworks. Discussion: This article identifies and describes elements of frameworks and how they can be adapted to inform the protocol and conduct of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Modifications may be needed to adapt the population, intervention, comparators, and outcomes normally used in protocol development to successfully describe complex interventions; in some instances, alternative frameworks may be better suited. Possible approaches to analytic frameworks for complex interventions that illustrate causal and associative linkages are outlined, including time elements, which systematic reviews of complex interventions may need to address. The need for and specifics of the accommodations vary with details of a specific systematic review. This in turn helps determine whether traditional frameworks are sufficient, can be refined, or if alternate frameworks must be adopted.",
keywords = "Analytic frameworks, Complex interventions, Evidence-based medicine, Research design, Review literature as topic, Systematic reviews",
author = "Mary Butler and Epstein, {Richard A.} and Annette Totten and Whitlock, {Evelyn P.} and Ansari, {Mohammed T.} and Damschroder, {Laura J.} and Ethan Balk and Bass, {Eric B.} and Berkman, {Nancy D.} and Susanne Hempel and Suchitra Iyer and Karen Schoelles and Jeanne-Marie Guise",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.013",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 3

T2 - Adapting frameworks to develop protocols

AU - Butler, Mary

AU - Epstein, Richard A.

AU - Totten, Annette

AU - Whitlock, Evelyn P.

AU - Ansari, Mohammed T.

AU - Damschroder, Laura J.

AU - Balk, Ethan

AU - Bass, Eric B.

AU - Berkman, Nancy D.

AU - Hempel, Susanne

AU - Iyer, Suchitra

AU - Schoelles, Karen

AU - Guise, Jeanne-Marie

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: Once a proposed topic has been identified for a systematic review and has undergone a question formulation stage, a protocol must be developed that specifies the scope and research questions in detail and outlines the methodology for conducting the systematic review. Rationale: Framework modifications are often needed to accommodate increased complexity. We describe and give examples of adaptations and alternatives to traditional analytic frameworks. Discussion: This article identifies and describes elements of frameworks and how they can be adapted to inform the protocol and conduct of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Modifications may be needed to adapt the population, intervention, comparators, and outcomes normally used in protocol development to successfully describe complex interventions; in some instances, alternative frameworks may be better suited. Possible approaches to analytic frameworks for complex interventions that illustrate causal and associative linkages are outlined, including time elements, which systematic reviews of complex interventions may need to address. The need for and specifics of the accommodations vary with details of a specific systematic review. This in turn helps determine whether traditional frameworks are sufficient, can be refined, or if alternate frameworks must be adopted.

AB - Background: Once a proposed topic has been identified for a systematic review and has undergone a question formulation stage, a protocol must be developed that specifies the scope and research questions in detail and outlines the methodology for conducting the systematic review. Rationale: Framework modifications are often needed to accommodate increased complexity. We describe and give examples of adaptations and alternatives to traditional analytic frameworks. Discussion: This article identifies and describes elements of frameworks and how they can be adapted to inform the protocol and conduct of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Modifications may be needed to adapt the population, intervention, comparators, and outcomes normally used in protocol development to successfully describe complex interventions; in some instances, alternative frameworks may be better suited. Possible approaches to analytic frameworks for complex interventions that illustrate causal and associative linkages are outlined, including time elements, which systematic reviews of complex interventions may need to address. The need for and specifics of the accommodations vary with details of a specific systematic review. This in turn helps determine whether traditional frameworks are sufficient, can be refined, or if alternate frameworks must be adopted.

KW - Analytic frameworks

KW - Complex interventions

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Research design

KW - Review literature as topic

KW - Systematic reviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025452268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025452268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.013

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

ER -