AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2: Defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions

Michael P. Kelly, Jane Noyes, Robert L. Kane, Christine Chang, Stacey Uhl, Karen A. Robinson, Stacey Springs, Mary E. Butler, Jeanne-Marie Guise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multidimensional and dynamic nature. Rationale: This paper builds on concepts introduced in paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical, and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Furthermore, it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions. Discussion: Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straightforward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Social Work
Health Education
Public Health
Medicine
Health

Keywords

  • Complex interventions
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Qualitative research
  • Research design
  • Review literature as topic
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2 : Defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions. / Kelly, Michael P.; Noyes, Jane; Kane, Robert L.; Chang, Christine; Uhl, Stacey; Robinson, Karen A.; Springs, Stacey; Butler, Mary E.; Guise, Jeanne-Marie.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kelly, Michael P. ; Noyes, Jane ; Kane, Robert L. ; Chang, Christine ; Uhl, Stacey ; Robinson, Karen A. ; Springs, Stacey ; Butler, Mary E. ; Guise, Jeanne-Marie. / AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2 : Defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017.
@article{72ba457713884e81b9fd00a39713f8c8,
title = "AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2: Defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions",
abstract = "Background: The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multidimensional and dynamic nature. Rationale: This paper builds on concepts introduced in paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical, and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Furthermore, it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions. Discussion: Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straightforward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.",
keywords = "Complex interventions, Evidence-based medicine, Qualitative research, Research design, Review literature as topic, Systematic review",
author = "Kelly, {Michael P.} and Jane Noyes and Kane, {Robert L.} and Christine Chang and Stacey Uhl and Robinson, {Karen A.} and Stacey Springs and Butler, {Mary E.} and Jeanne-Marie Guise",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2

T2 - Defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions

AU - Kelly, Michael P.

AU - Noyes, Jane

AU - Kane, Robert L.

AU - Chang, Christine

AU - Uhl, Stacey

AU - Robinson, Karen A.

AU - Springs, Stacey

AU - Butler, Mary E.

AU - Guise, Jeanne-Marie

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multidimensional and dynamic nature. Rationale: This paper builds on concepts introduced in paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical, and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Furthermore, it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions. Discussion: Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straightforward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.

AB - Background: The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multidimensional and dynamic nature. Rationale: This paper builds on concepts introduced in paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical, and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Furthermore, it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions. Discussion: Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straightforward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.

KW - Complex interventions

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Research design

KW - Review literature as topic

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027266383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027266383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 28720514

AN - SCOPUS:85027266383

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

ER -