TY - CHAP
T1 - Age Differences in Complex Decision Making
AU - Peters, Ellen
AU - Dieckmann, Nathan F.
AU - Weller, Joshua
N1 - Funding Information:
Preparation of this chapter was supported by NSF Grants SES-0339204, SES-0922783, and SES-0820585. Portions of this paper are based on Peters, E., Hess, T.M., Västfjäll, D., & Auman, C. (2007). Adult age differences in dual information processes: Implications for the role of affective and deliberative processes in older adults’ decision making. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2 (1), 1–23.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - This chapter explores research and theories that address some of the issues that older adults (generally defined as 65 years and older) face in making everyday judgments and decisions. A decision is a choice between two or more options or alternatives. One of those options could be the status quo. A judgment, in contrast, is the psychological appraisal or evaluation of information. It is an understanding of a situation or an individual. Life-span theories are used fruitfully to provide predictions about age differences in judgment and decision-making. Life-span theories also point toward phenomena in decision making that have been little studied. Because older adults process information in ways that are different from younger adults, how they construct their preferences will also be different. These preference-construction processes may thus play a determining role in choices and undermine the notion of "informed choice" as aspects of the situation push individuals toward particular choices. The power of preference construction, however, can also be harnessed by understanding descriptively how decision makers make choices and normatively (or logically) what they should choose. Finally, one can examine the difference between the normative analysis and descriptive study to offer prescriptive interventions that help decision makers arrive at better choices. © 2011
AB - This chapter explores research and theories that address some of the issues that older adults (generally defined as 65 years and older) face in making everyday judgments and decisions. A decision is a choice between two or more options or alternatives. One of those options could be the status quo. A judgment, in contrast, is the psychological appraisal or evaluation of information. It is an understanding of a situation or an individual. Life-span theories are used fruitfully to provide predictions about age differences in judgment and decision-making. Life-span theories also point toward phenomena in decision making that have been little studied. Because older adults process information in ways that are different from younger adults, how they construct their preferences will also be different. These preference-construction processes may thus play a determining role in choices and undermine the notion of "informed choice" as aspects of the situation push individuals toward particular choices. The power of preference construction, however, can also be harnessed by understanding descriptively how decision makers make choices and normatively (or logically) what they should choose. Finally, one can examine the difference between the normative analysis and descriptive study to offer prescriptive interventions that help decision makers arrive at better choices. © 2011
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054886510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054886510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-380882-0.00009-7
DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-380882-0.00009-7
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:80054886510
SN - 9780123808820
SP - 133
EP - 151
BT - Handbook of the Psychology of Aging
PB - Elsevier Inc.
ER -