Adoption of social determinants of health ehr tools by community health centers

Rachel Gold, Arwen Bunce, Stuart Cowburn, Katie Dambrun, Marla Dearing, Mary Middendorf, Ned Mossman, Celine Hollombe, Peter Mahr, Gerardo Melgar, James Davis, Laura Gottlieb, Erika Cottrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE This pilot study assessed the feasibility of implementing electronic health record (EHR) tools for collecting, reviewing, and acting on patient-reported social determinants of health (SDH) data in community health centers (CHCs). We believe it is the first such US study. METHODS We implemented a suite of SDH data tools in 3 Pacific Northwest CHCs in June 2016, and used mixed methods to assess their adoption through July 2017. We modified the tools at clinic request; for example, we added questions that ask if the patient wanted assistance with SDH needs. RESULTS Social determinants of health data were collected on 1,130 patients during the study period; 97% to 99% of screened patients (n = 1,098) had ≥1 SDH need documented in the EHR, of whom 211 (19%) had an EHR-documented SDH referral. Only 15% to 21% of patients with a documented SDH need indicated wanting help. Examples of lessons learned on adoption of EHR SDH tools indicate that clinics should: consider how to best integrate tools into existing workflow processes; ensure that staff tasked with SDH efforts receive adequate tool training and access; and consider that timing of data entry impacts how and when SDH data can be used. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that adoption of systematic EHR-based SDH documentation may be feasible, but substantial barriers to adoption exist. Lessons from this study may inform primary care providers seeking to implement SDH-related efforts, and related health policies. Far more research is needed to address implementation barriers related to SDH documentation in EHRs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)399-407
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Determinants of Health
Community Health Centers
Electronic Health Records
Documentation
Northwestern United States
Workflow
Health Policy

Keywords

  • Community health centers
  • Electronic health records
  • Implementation
  • Social determinants of health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Gold, R., Bunce, A., Cowburn, S., Dambrun, K., Dearing, M., Middendorf, M., ... Cottrell, E. (2018). Adoption of social determinants of health ehr tools by community health centers. Annals of Family Medicine, 16(5), 399-407. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2275

Adoption of social determinants of health ehr tools by community health centers. / Gold, Rachel; Bunce, Arwen; Cowburn, Stuart; Dambrun, Katie; Dearing, Marla; Middendorf, Mary; Mossman, Ned; Hollombe, Celine; Mahr, Peter; Melgar, Gerardo; Davis, James; Gottlieb, Laura; Cottrell, Erika.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 5, 01.09.2018, p. 399-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gold, R, Bunce, A, Cowburn, S, Dambrun, K, Dearing, M, Middendorf, M, Mossman, N, Hollombe, C, Mahr, P, Melgar, G, Davis, J, Gottlieb, L & Cottrell, E 2018, 'Adoption of social determinants of health ehr tools by community health centers', Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 399-407. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2275
Gold R, Bunce A, Cowburn S, Dambrun K, Dearing M, Middendorf M et al. Adoption of social determinants of health ehr tools by community health centers. Annals of Family Medicine. 2018 Sep 1;16(5):399-407. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2275
Gold, Rachel ; Bunce, Arwen ; Cowburn, Stuart ; Dambrun, Katie ; Dearing, Marla ; Middendorf, Mary ; Mossman, Ned ; Hollombe, Celine ; Mahr, Peter ; Melgar, Gerardo ; Davis, James ; Gottlieb, Laura ; Cottrell, Erika. / Adoption of social determinants of health ehr tools by community health centers. In: Annals of Family Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 16, No. 5. pp. 399-407.
@article{9efffb43f8c34410a71ada2d39e1047d,
title = "Adoption of social determinants of health ehr tools by community health centers",
abstract = "PURPOSE This pilot study assessed the feasibility of implementing electronic health record (EHR) tools for collecting, reviewing, and acting on patient-reported social determinants of health (SDH) data in community health centers (CHCs). We believe it is the first such US study. METHODS We implemented a suite of SDH data tools in 3 Pacific Northwest CHCs in June 2016, and used mixed methods to assess their adoption through July 2017. We modified the tools at clinic request; for example, we added questions that ask if the patient wanted assistance with SDH needs. RESULTS Social determinants of health data were collected on 1,130 patients during the study period; 97{\%} to 99{\%} of screened patients (n = 1,098) had ≥1 SDH need documented in the EHR, of whom 211 (19{\%}) had an EHR-documented SDH referral. Only 15{\%} to 21{\%} of patients with a documented SDH need indicated wanting help. Examples of lessons learned on adoption of EHR SDH tools indicate that clinics should: consider how to best integrate tools into existing workflow processes; ensure that staff tasked with SDH efforts receive adequate tool training and access; and consider that timing of data entry impacts how and when SDH data can be used. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that adoption of systematic EHR-based SDH documentation may be feasible, but substantial barriers to adoption exist. Lessons from this study may inform primary care providers seeking to implement SDH-related efforts, and related health policies. Far more research is needed to address implementation barriers related to SDH documentation in EHRs.",
keywords = "Community health centers, Electronic health records, Implementation, Social determinants of health",
author = "Rachel Gold and Arwen Bunce and Stuart Cowburn and Katie Dambrun and Marla Dearing and Mary Middendorf and Ned Mossman and Celine Hollombe and Peter Mahr and Gerardo Melgar and James Davis and Laura Gottlieb and Erika Cottrell",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1370/afm.2275",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "399--407",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adoption of social determinants of health ehr tools by community health centers

AU - Gold, Rachel

AU - Bunce, Arwen

AU - Cowburn, Stuart

AU - Dambrun, Katie

AU - Dearing, Marla

AU - Middendorf, Mary

AU - Mossman, Ned

AU - Hollombe, Celine

AU - Mahr, Peter

AU - Melgar, Gerardo

AU - Davis, James

AU - Gottlieb, Laura

AU - Cottrell, Erika

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - PURPOSE This pilot study assessed the feasibility of implementing electronic health record (EHR) tools for collecting, reviewing, and acting on patient-reported social determinants of health (SDH) data in community health centers (CHCs). We believe it is the first such US study. METHODS We implemented a suite of SDH data tools in 3 Pacific Northwest CHCs in June 2016, and used mixed methods to assess their adoption through July 2017. We modified the tools at clinic request; for example, we added questions that ask if the patient wanted assistance with SDH needs. RESULTS Social determinants of health data were collected on 1,130 patients during the study period; 97% to 99% of screened patients (n = 1,098) had ≥1 SDH need documented in the EHR, of whom 211 (19%) had an EHR-documented SDH referral. Only 15% to 21% of patients with a documented SDH need indicated wanting help. Examples of lessons learned on adoption of EHR SDH tools indicate that clinics should: consider how to best integrate tools into existing workflow processes; ensure that staff tasked with SDH efforts receive adequate tool training and access; and consider that timing of data entry impacts how and when SDH data can be used. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that adoption of systematic EHR-based SDH documentation may be feasible, but substantial barriers to adoption exist. Lessons from this study may inform primary care providers seeking to implement SDH-related efforts, and related health policies. Far more research is needed to address implementation barriers related to SDH documentation in EHRs.

AB - PURPOSE This pilot study assessed the feasibility of implementing electronic health record (EHR) tools for collecting, reviewing, and acting on patient-reported social determinants of health (SDH) data in community health centers (CHCs). We believe it is the first such US study. METHODS We implemented a suite of SDH data tools in 3 Pacific Northwest CHCs in June 2016, and used mixed methods to assess their adoption through July 2017. We modified the tools at clinic request; for example, we added questions that ask if the patient wanted assistance with SDH needs. RESULTS Social determinants of health data were collected on 1,130 patients during the study period; 97% to 99% of screened patients (n = 1,098) had ≥1 SDH need documented in the EHR, of whom 211 (19%) had an EHR-documented SDH referral. Only 15% to 21% of patients with a documented SDH need indicated wanting help. Examples of lessons learned on adoption of EHR SDH tools indicate that clinics should: consider how to best integrate tools into existing workflow processes; ensure that staff tasked with SDH efforts receive adequate tool training and access; and consider that timing of data entry impacts how and when SDH data can be used. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that adoption of systematic EHR-based SDH documentation may be feasible, but substantial barriers to adoption exist. Lessons from this study may inform primary care providers seeking to implement SDH-related efforts, and related health policies. Far more research is needed to address implementation barriers related to SDH documentation in EHRs.

KW - Community health centers

KW - Electronic health records

KW - Implementation

KW - Social determinants of health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053291585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053291585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.2275

DO - 10.1370/afm.2275

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 399

EP - 407

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 5

ER -