TY - JOUR
T1 - Adolescent dopamine neurons represent reward differently during action and state guided learning
AU - McCane, Aqilah M.
AU - Wegener, Meredyth A.
AU - Faraji, Mojdeh
AU - Rivera-Garcia, Maria T.
AU - Wallin-Miller, Kathryn G.
AU - Costa, Vincent D.
AU - Moghaddam, Bita
N1 - Funding Information:
Received June 22, 2021; revised Sep. 8, 2021; accepted Sep. 16, 2021. Author contributions: A.M.M., M.A.W., M.T.R.G., and K.G.W.-M. performed research; A.M.M., M.A.W., M.F., M.T.R.G., K.G.W.-M., and V.D.C. analyzed data; A.M.M., M.A.W., M.F., M.T.R.G., K.G.W.-M., V.D.C., and B.M. edited the paper; A.M.M. and B.M. wrote the paper; M.A.W., M.T.R.G., K.G.W.-M., and B.M. designed research; M.A.W. wrote the first draft of the paper. This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grants R01MH048404 and R01MH115027 to B.M., and NIAAA F32AA027935 to A.M.M. We thank Alina Bogachuk for technical assistance. M. A. Wegener’s present address: Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. M. Faraji’s present address: Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. M. T. Rivera Garcia’s present address: R.S. Dow Neurobiology Department, Legacy Research Institute, Portland, Oregon. pA.M.M. and M.A.W. contributed equally to this work as co-first authors. The authors declare no competing financial interests. Correspondence should be addressed to Bita Moghaddam at bita@ohsu.edu. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1321-21.2021 Copyright © 2021 the authors
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 the authors
PY - 2021/11/10
Y1 - 2021/11/10
N2 - Neuronal underpinning of learning cause-and-effect associations in the adolescent brain remains poorly understood. Two fundamental forms of associative learning are Pavlovian (classical) conditioning, where a stimulus is followed by an outcome, and operant (instrumental) conditioning, where outcome is contingent on action execution. Both forms of learning, when associated with a rewarding outcome, rely on midbrain dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra (SN). We find that, in adolescent male rats, reward-guided associative learning is encoded differently by midbrain dopamine neurons in each conditioning paradigm. Whereas simultaneously recorded VTA and SN adult neurons have a similar phasic response to reward delivery during both forms of conditioning, adolescent neurons display a muted reward response during operant but a profoundly larger reward response during Pavlovian conditioning. These results suggest that adolescent neurons assign a different value to reward when it is not gated by action. The learning rate of adolescents and adults during both forms of conditioning was similar, supporting the notion that differences in reward response in each paradigm may be because of differences in motivation and independent of state versus action value learning. Static characteristics of dopamine neurons, such as dopamine cell number and size, were similar in the VTA and SN of both ages, but there were age-related differences in stimulated dopamine release and correlated spike activity, suggesting that differences in reward responsiveness by adolescent dopamine neurons are not because of differences in intrinsic properties of these neurons but engagement of different dopaminergic networks.
AB - Neuronal underpinning of learning cause-and-effect associations in the adolescent brain remains poorly understood. Two fundamental forms of associative learning are Pavlovian (classical) conditioning, where a stimulus is followed by an outcome, and operant (instrumental) conditioning, where outcome is contingent on action execution. Both forms of learning, when associated with a rewarding outcome, rely on midbrain dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra (SN). We find that, in adolescent male rats, reward-guided associative learning is encoded differently by midbrain dopamine neurons in each conditioning paradigm. Whereas simultaneously recorded VTA and SN adult neurons have a similar phasic response to reward delivery during both forms of conditioning, adolescent neurons display a muted reward response during operant but a profoundly larger reward response during Pavlovian conditioning. These results suggest that adolescent neurons assign a different value to reward when it is not gated by action. The learning rate of adolescents and adults during both forms of conditioning was similar, supporting the notion that differences in reward response in each paradigm may be because of differences in motivation and independent of state versus action value learning. Static characteristics of dopamine neurons, such as dopamine cell number and size, were similar in the VTA and SN of both ages, but there were age-related differences in stimulated dopamine release and correlated spike activity, suggesting that differences in reward responsiveness by adolescent dopamine neurons are not because of differences in intrinsic properties of these neurons but engagement of different dopaminergic networks.
KW - Addiction
KW - Impulsivity
KW - Motivation
KW - Pavlovian conditioning
KW - Reinforcement learning
KW - Schizophrenia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120738000&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120738000&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1321-21.2021
DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1321-21.2021
M3 - Article
C2 - 34611024
AN - SCOPUS:85120738000
SN - 0270-6474
VL - 41
SP - 9419
EP - 9430
JO - Journal of Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Neuroscience
IS - 45
ER -