Acupuncture and chiropractic care for chronic pain in an integrated health plan: a mixed methods study

Lynn L. DeBar, Charles Elder, Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Mikel Aickin, Richard (Rick) Deyo, Richard Meenan, John Dickerson, Jennifer A. Webster, Bobbi Jo Yarborough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Substantial recent research examines the efficacy of many types of complementary and alternative (CAM) therapies. However, outcomes associated with the "real-world" use of CAM has been largely overlooked, despite calls for CAM therapies to be studied in the manner in which they are practiced. Americans seek CAM treatments far more often for chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) than for any other condition. Among CAM treatments for CMP, acupuncture and chiropractic (A/C) care are among those with the highest acceptance by physician groups and the best evidence to support their use. Further, recent alarming increases in delivery of opioid treatment and surgical interventions for chronic pain--despite their high costs, potential adverse effects, and modest efficacy--suggests the need to evaluate real world outcomes associated with promising non-pharmacological/non-surgical CAM treatments for CMP, which are often well accepted by patients and increasingly used in the community.Methods/Design: This multi-phase, mixed methods study will: (1) conduct a retrospective study using information from electronic medical records (EMRs) of a large HMO to identify unique clusters of patients with CMP (e.g., those with differing demographics, histories of pain condition, use of allopathic and CAM health services, and comorbidity profiles) that may be associated with different propensities for A/C utilization and/or differential outcomes associated with such care; (2) use qualitative interviews to explore allopathic providers' recommendations for A/C and patients' decisions to pursue and retain CAM care; and (3) prospectively evaluate health services/costs and broader clinical and functional outcomes associated with the receipt of A/C relative to carefully matched comparison participants receiving traditional CMP services. Sensitivity analyses will compare methods relying solely on EMR-derived data versus analyses supplementing EMR data with conventionally collected patient and clinician data.Discussion: Successful completion of these aggregate aims will provide an evaluation of outcomes associated with the real-world use of A/C services. The trio of retrospective, qualitative, and prospective study will also provide a clearer understanding of the decision-making processes behind the use of A/C for CMP and a transportable methodology that can be applied to other health care settings, CAM treatments, and clinical populations.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01345409.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number118
JournalBMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 25 2011

Fingerprint

Chiropractic
Musculoskeletal Pain
Acupuncture
Chronic Pain
Health
Electronic Health Records
Health Services
Therapeutics
Retrospective Studies
Health Maintenance Organizations
Complementary Therapies
Health Care Costs
Opioid Analgesics
Comorbidity
Decision Making
Demography
Prospective Studies
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

Acupuncture and chiropractic care for chronic pain in an integrated health plan : a mixed methods study. / DeBar, Lynn L.; Elder, Charles; Ritenbaugh, Cheryl; Aickin, Mikel; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Meenan, Richard; Dickerson, John; Webster, Jennifer A.; Jo Yarborough, Bobbi.

In: BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol. 11, 118, 25.11.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DeBar, Lynn L. ; Elder, Charles ; Ritenbaugh, Cheryl ; Aickin, Mikel ; Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Meenan, Richard ; Dickerson, John ; Webster, Jennifer A. ; Jo Yarborough, Bobbi. / Acupuncture and chiropractic care for chronic pain in an integrated health plan : a mixed methods study. In: BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 11.
@article{874778cd18194c128a295bd79f0a3726,
title = "Acupuncture and chiropractic care for chronic pain in an integrated health plan: a mixed methods study",
abstract = "Background: Substantial recent research examines the efficacy of many types of complementary and alternative (CAM) therapies. However, outcomes associated with the {"}real-world{"} use of CAM has been largely overlooked, despite calls for CAM therapies to be studied in the manner in which they are practiced. Americans seek CAM treatments far more often for chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) than for any other condition. Among CAM treatments for CMP, acupuncture and chiropractic (A/C) care are among those with the highest acceptance by physician groups and the best evidence to support their use. Further, recent alarming increases in delivery of opioid treatment and surgical interventions for chronic pain--despite their high costs, potential adverse effects, and modest efficacy--suggests the need to evaluate real world outcomes associated with promising non-pharmacological/non-surgical CAM treatments for CMP, which are often well accepted by patients and increasingly used in the community.Methods/Design: This multi-phase, mixed methods study will: (1) conduct a retrospective study using information from electronic medical records (EMRs) of a large HMO to identify unique clusters of patients with CMP (e.g., those with differing demographics, histories of pain condition, use of allopathic and CAM health services, and comorbidity profiles) that may be associated with different propensities for A/C utilization and/or differential outcomes associated with such care; (2) use qualitative interviews to explore allopathic providers' recommendations for A/C and patients' decisions to pursue and retain CAM care; and (3) prospectively evaluate health services/costs and broader clinical and functional outcomes associated with the receipt of A/C relative to carefully matched comparison participants receiving traditional CMP services. Sensitivity analyses will compare methods relying solely on EMR-derived data versus analyses supplementing EMR data with conventionally collected patient and clinician data.Discussion: Successful completion of these aggregate aims will provide an evaluation of outcomes associated with the real-world use of A/C services. The trio of retrospective, qualitative, and prospective study will also provide a clearer understanding of the decision-making processes behind the use of A/C for CMP and a transportable methodology that can be applied to other health care settings, CAM treatments, and clinical populations.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01345409.",
author = "DeBar, {Lynn L.} and Charles Elder and Cheryl Ritenbaugh and Mikel Aickin and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Richard Meenan and John Dickerson and Webster, {Jennifer A.} and {Jo Yarborough}, Bobbi",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6882-11-118",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine",
issn = "1472-6882",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acupuncture and chiropractic care for chronic pain in an integrated health plan

T2 - a mixed methods study

AU - DeBar, Lynn L.

AU - Elder, Charles

AU - Ritenbaugh, Cheryl

AU - Aickin, Mikel

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Meenan, Richard

AU - Dickerson, John

AU - Webster, Jennifer A.

AU - Jo Yarborough, Bobbi

PY - 2011/11/25

Y1 - 2011/11/25

N2 - Background: Substantial recent research examines the efficacy of many types of complementary and alternative (CAM) therapies. However, outcomes associated with the "real-world" use of CAM has been largely overlooked, despite calls for CAM therapies to be studied in the manner in which they are practiced. Americans seek CAM treatments far more often for chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) than for any other condition. Among CAM treatments for CMP, acupuncture and chiropractic (A/C) care are among those with the highest acceptance by physician groups and the best evidence to support their use. Further, recent alarming increases in delivery of opioid treatment and surgical interventions for chronic pain--despite their high costs, potential adverse effects, and modest efficacy--suggests the need to evaluate real world outcomes associated with promising non-pharmacological/non-surgical CAM treatments for CMP, which are often well accepted by patients and increasingly used in the community.Methods/Design: This multi-phase, mixed methods study will: (1) conduct a retrospective study using information from electronic medical records (EMRs) of a large HMO to identify unique clusters of patients with CMP (e.g., those with differing demographics, histories of pain condition, use of allopathic and CAM health services, and comorbidity profiles) that may be associated with different propensities for A/C utilization and/or differential outcomes associated with such care; (2) use qualitative interviews to explore allopathic providers' recommendations for A/C and patients' decisions to pursue and retain CAM care; and (3) prospectively evaluate health services/costs and broader clinical and functional outcomes associated with the receipt of A/C relative to carefully matched comparison participants receiving traditional CMP services. Sensitivity analyses will compare methods relying solely on EMR-derived data versus analyses supplementing EMR data with conventionally collected patient and clinician data.Discussion: Successful completion of these aggregate aims will provide an evaluation of outcomes associated with the real-world use of A/C services. The trio of retrospective, qualitative, and prospective study will also provide a clearer understanding of the decision-making processes behind the use of A/C for CMP and a transportable methodology that can be applied to other health care settings, CAM treatments, and clinical populations.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01345409.

AB - Background: Substantial recent research examines the efficacy of many types of complementary and alternative (CAM) therapies. However, outcomes associated with the "real-world" use of CAM has been largely overlooked, despite calls for CAM therapies to be studied in the manner in which they are practiced. Americans seek CAM treatments far more often for chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) than for any other condition. Among CAM treatments for CMP, acupuncture and chiropractic (A/C) care are among those with the highest acceptance by physician groups and the best evidence to support their use. Further, recent alarming increases in delivery of opioid treatment and surgical interventions for chronic pain--despite their high costs, potential adverse effects, and modest efficacy--suggests the need to evaluate real world outcomes associated with promising non-pharmacological/non-surgical CAM treatments for CMP, which are often well accepted by patients and increasingly used in the community.Methods/Design: This multi-phase, mixed methods study will: (1) conduct a retrospective study using information from electronic medical records (EMRs) of a large HMO to identify unique clusters of patients with CMP (e.g., those with differing demographics, histories of pain condition, use of allopathic and CAM health services, and comorbidity profiles) that may be associated with different propensities for A/C utilization and/or differential outcomes associated with such care; (2) use qualitative interviews to explore allopathic providers' recommendations for A/C and patients' decisions to pursue and retain CAM care; and (3) prospectively evaluate health services/costs and broader clinical and functional outcomes associated with the receipt of A/C relative to carefully matched comparison participants receiving traditional CMP services. Sensitivity analyses will compare methods relying solely on EMR-derived data versus analyses supplementing EMR data with conventionally collected patient and clinician data.Discussion: Successful completion of these aggregate aims will provide an evaluation of outcomes associated with the real-world use of A/C services. The trio of retrospective, qualitative, and prospective study will also provide a clearer understanding of the decision-making processes behind the use of A/C for CMP and a transportable methodology that can be applied to other health care settings, CAM treatments, and clinical populations.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01345409.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82055163879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82055163879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6882-11-118

DO - 10.1186/1472-6882-11-118

M3 - Article

C2 - 22118061

AN - SCOPUS:82055163879

VL - 11

JO - BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

JF - BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

SN - 1472-6882

M1 - 118

ER -