Actual financial comparison of four strategies to evaluate patients with potential acute coronary syndromes

Anna Marie Chang, Frances S. Shofer, Mark G. Weiner, Marie B. Synnestvedt, Harold I. Litt, William G. Baxt, Judd E. Hollander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Small studies have shown that a negative computed tomography coronary angiogram (CTA) in low-risk chest pain patients predicts a low rate of 30-day adverse events. The authors hypothesized that an immediate CTA strategy would be as effective but less costly than alternative strategies for evaluation of patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: The authors retrospectively compared four strategies for evaluation of patients after initial physician determination that the patient required admission and testing to rule out ACS. Patients were frequency-matched by age, race, gender, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score, and initial electrocardiogram (ECG). The four groups were immediate CTA in the emergency department (ED) without serial markers (n = 98); clinical decision unit?observation unit (CDU) with biomarkers and CTA (n = 102); CDU evaluation with serial cardiac biomarkers and stress testing (n = 154); and usual care, defined as admission with serial biomarkers and hospitalist-directed evaluation (n = 289). The main outcomes were actual cost of care (facility direct and indirect fixed, facility variable direct labor and supply costs), length of stay (LOS), diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), and safety (30-day death or myocardial infarction [MI]). Results: Patients in each group were of similar age (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 46 ± 9 years), race (62% African American), and gender (57% female) and had similar TIMI scores (100% between 0-2). Comparing immediate CTA versus CDU CTA versus CDU stress versus usual care, median costs were less ($1,240 vs. 2,318 vs. 4,024 vs. 2,913; p <0.01), and LOS was shorter (8.1 hr vs. 20.9 hr vs. 26.2 hr vs. 30.2 hr; p <0.01). Diagnosis of CAD was similar (5.1% vs. 5.9% vs. 5.8% vs. 6.6%; p = 0.95), but fewer patients had 30-day death?MI (0% vs. 0% vs. 0.7% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.04) or 30-day readmission (0% vs. 3.2% vs. 2.3% vs. 12.2%; p <0.01). Conclusions: Compared to the other strategies, immediate CTA was as safe, identified as many patients with CAD, had the lowest cost, had the shortest LOS, and allowed discharge for the majority of patients. Larger prospective studies should confirm safety before immediate CTA replaces other strategies to rule out possible ACS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)649-655
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Acute Coronary Syndrome
Angiography
Tomography
Myocardial Infarction
Costs and Cost Analysis
Coronary Artery Disease
Length of Stay
Biomarkers
Hospitalists
Safety
Patient Discharge
Patient Admission
Chest Pain
African Americans
Hospital Emergency Service
Electrocardiography
Observation
Prospective Studies
Physicians

Keywords

  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Computed tomography coronary angiography
  • Cost analysis
  • Observation unit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Chang, A. M., Shofer, F. S., Weiner, M. G., Synnestvedt, M. B., Litt, H. I., Baxt, W. G., & Hollander, J. E. (2008). Actual financial comparison of four strategies to evaluate patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(7), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00159.x

Actual financial comparison of four strategies to evaluate patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. / Chang, Anna Marie; Shofer, Frances S.; Weiner, Mark G.; Synnestvedt, Marie B.; Litt, Harold I.; Baxt, William G.; Hollander, Judd E.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 7, 07.2008, p. 649-655.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chang, AM, Shofer, FS, Weiner, MG, Synnestvedt, MB, Litt, HI, Baxt, WG & Hollander, JE 2008, 'Actual financial comparison of four strategies to evaluate patients with potential acute coronary syndromes', Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00159.x
Chang, Anna Marie ; Shofer, Frances S. ; Weiner, Mark G. ; Synnestvedt, Marie B. ; Litt, Harold I. ; Baxt, William G. ; Hollander, Judd E. / Actual financial comparison of four strategies to evaluate patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 15, No. 7. pp. 649-655.
@article{82dbcc3f240b47a4bad0936cc6686ec6,
title = "Actual financial comparison of four strategies to evaluate patients with potential acute coronary syndromes",
abstract = "Objectives: Small studies have shown that a negative computed tomography coronary angiogram (CTA) in low-risk chest pain patients predicts a low rate of 30-day adverse events. The authors hypothesized that an immediate CTA strategy would be as effective but less costly than alternative strategies for evaluation of patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: The authors retrospectively compared four strategies for evaluation of patients after initial physician determination that the patient required admission and testing to rule out ACS. Patients were frequency-matched by age, race, gender, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score, and initial electrocardiogram (ECG). The four groups were immediate CTA in the emergency department (ED) without serial markers (n = 98); clinical decision unit?observation unit (CDU) with biomarkers and CTA (n = 102); CDU evaluation with serial cardiac biomarkers and stress testing (n = 154); and usual care, defined as admission with serial biomarkers and hospitalist-directed evaluation (n = 289). The main outcomes were actual cost of care (facility direct and indirect fixed, facility variable direct labor and supply costs), length of stay (LOS), diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), and safety (30-day death or myocardial infarction [MI]). Results: Patients in each group were of similar age (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 46 ± 9 years), race (62{\%} African American), and gender (57{\%} female) and had similar TIMI scores (100{\%} between 0-2). Comparing immediate CTA versus CDU CTA versus CDU stress versus usual care, median costs were less ($1,240 vs. 2,318 vs. 4,024 vs. 2,913; p <0.01), and LOS was shorter (8.1 hr vs. 20.9 hr vs. 26.2 hr vs. 30.2 hr; p <0.01). Diagnosis of CAD was similar (5.1{\%} vs. 5.9{\%} vs. 5.8{\%} vs. 6.6{\%}; p = 0.95), but fewer patients had 30-day death?MI (0{\%} vs. 0{\%} vs. 0.7{\%} vs. 3.1{\%}; p = 0.04) or 30-day readmission (0{\%} vs. 3.2{\%} vs. 2.3{\%} vs. 12.2{\%}; p <0.01). Conclusions: Compared to the other strategies, immediate CTA was as safe, identified as many patients with CAD, had the lowest cost, had the shortest LOS, and allowed discharge for the majority of patients. Larger prospective studies should confirm safety before immediate CTA replaces other strategies to rule out possible ACS.",
keywords = "Acute coronary syndrome, Computed tomography coronary angiography, Cost analysis, Observation unit",
author = "Chang, {Anna Marie} and Shofer, {Frances S.} and Weiner, {Mark G.} and Synnestvedt, {Marie B.} and Litt, {Harold I.} and Baxt, {William G.} and Hollander, {Judd E.}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00159.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "649--655",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Actual financial comparison of four strategies to evaluate patients with potential acute coronary syndromes

AU - Chang, Anna Marie

AU - Shofer, Frances S.

AU - Weiner, Mark G.

AU - Synnestvedt, Marie B.

AU - Litt, Harold I.

AU - Baxt, William G.

AU - Hollander, Judd E.

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - Objectives: Small studies have shown that a negative computed tomography coronary angiogram (CTA) in low-risk chest pain patients predicts a low rate of 30-day adverse events. The authors hypothesized that an immediate CTA strategy would be as effective but less costly than alternative strategies for evaluation of patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: The authors retrospectively compared four strategies for evaluation of patients after initial physician determination that the patient required admission and testing to rule out ACS. Patients were frequency-matched by age, race, gender, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score, and initial electrocardiogram (ECG). The four groups were immediate CTA in the emergency department (ED) without serial markers (n = 98); clinical decision unit?observation unit (CDU) with biomarkers and CTA (n = 102); CDU evaluation with serial cardiac biomarkers and stress testing (n = 154); and usual care, defined as admission with serial biomarkers and hospitalist-directed evaluation (n = 289). The main outcomes were actual cost of care (facility direct and indirect fixed, facility variable direct labor and supply costs), length of stay (LOS), diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), and safety (30-day death or myocardial infarction [MI]). Results: Patients in each group were of similar age (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 46 ± 9 years), race (62% African American), and gender (57% female) and had similar TIMI scores (100% between 0-2). Comparing immediate CTA versus CDU CTA versus CDU stress versus usual care, median costs were less ($1,240 vs. 2,318 vs. 4,024 vs. 2,913; p <0.01), and LOS was shorter (8.1 hr vs. 20.9 hr vs. 26.2 hr vs. 30.2 hr; p <0.01). Diagnosis of CAD was similar (5.1% vs. 5.9% vs. 5.8% vs. 6.6%; p = 0.95), but fewer patients had 30-day death?MI (0% vs. 0% vs. 0.7% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.04) or 30-day readmission (0% vs. 3.2% vs. 2.3% vs. 12.2%; p <0.01). Conclusions: Compared to the other strategies, immediate CTA was as safe, identified as many patients with CAD, had the lowest cost, had the shortest LOS, and allowed discharge for the majority of patients. Larger prospective studies should confirm safety before immediate CTA replaces other strategies to rule out possible ACS.

AB - Objectives: Small studies have shown that a negative computed tomography coronary angiogram (CTA) in low-risk chest pain patients predicts a low rate of 30-day adverse events. The authors hypothesized that an immediate CTA strategy would be as effective but less costly than alternative strategies for evaluation of patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: The authors retrospectively compared four strategies for evaluation of patients after initial physician determination that the patient required admission and testing to rule out ACS. Patients were frequency-matched by age, race, gender, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score, and initial electrocardiogram (ECG). The four groups were immediate CTA in the emergency department (ED) without serial markers (n = 98); clinical decision unit?observation unit (CDU) with biomarkers and CTA (n = 102); CDU evaluation with serial cardiac biomarkers and stress testing (n = 154); and usual care, defined as admission with serial biomarkers and hospitalist-directed evaluation (n = 289). The main outcomes were actual cost of care (facility direct and indirect fixed, facility variable direct labor and supply costs), length of stay (LOS), diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), and safety (30-day death or myocardial infarction [MI]). Results: Patients in each group were of similar age (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 46 ± 9 years), race (62% African American), and gender (57% female) and had similar TIMI scores (100% between 0-2). Comparing immediate CTA versus CDU CTA versus CDU stress versus usual care, median costs were less ($1,240 vs. 2,318 vs. 4,024 vs. 2,913; p <0.01), and LOS was shorter (8.1 hr vs. 20.9 hr vs. 26.2 hr vs. 30.2 hr; p <0.01). Diagnosis of CAD was similar (5.1% vs. 5.9% vs. 5.8% vs. 6.6%; p = 0.95), but fewer patients had 30-day death?MI (0% vs. 0% vs. 0.7% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.04) or 30-day readmission (0% vs. 3.2% vs. 2.3% vs. 12.2%; p <0.01). Conclusions: Compared to the other strategies, immediate CTA was as safe, identified as many patients with CAD, had the lowest cost, had the shortest LOS, and allowed discharge for the majority of patients. Larger prospective studies should confirm safety before immediate CTA replaces other strategies to rule out possible ACS.

KW - Acute coronary syndrome

KW - Computed tomography coronary angiography

KW - Cost analysis

KW - Observation unit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56849112173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56849112173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00159.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00159.x

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 649

EP - 655

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 7

ER -