ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-treatment Follow-up Prostate Cancer

Expert Panel on Urologic Imaging:

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Diagnosis and management of prostate cancer post treatment is a large and complex problem, and care of these patients requires multidisciplinary involvement of imaging, medical, and surgical specialties. Imaging capabilities for evaluation of men with recurrent prostate cancer are rapidly evolving, particularly with PET and MRI. At the same time, treatment options and capabilities are expanding and improving. These recommendations separate patients into three broad categories: (1) patients status post–radical prostatectomy, (2) clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after nonsurgical local and pelvic treatments, and (3) metastatic prostate. This article is a review of the current literature regarding imaging in these settings and the resulting recommendations for imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S132-S149
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Guidelines
Surgical Specialties
Therapeutics
Expert Testimony
Prostatectomy
Radiology
Prostate
Patient Care
Medicine

Keywords

  • Appropriate Use Criteria
  • Appropriateness Criteria
  • AUC
  • Choline and fluciclovine PET
  • Metastatic prostate cancer
  • MRI
  • Prostate cancer
  • Recurrent prostate cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-treatment Follow-up Prostate Cancer. / Expert Panel on Urologic Imaging:.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 15, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. S132-S149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Expert Panel on Urologic Imaging:. / ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-treatment Follow-up Prostate Cancer. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2018 ; Vol. 15, No. 5. pp. S132-S149.
@article{fb845d1f6dd6466eaf1d6916ea416334,
title = "ACR Appropriateness Criteria{\circledR} Post-treatment Follow-up Prostate Cancer",
abstract = "Diagnosis and management of prostate cancer post treatment is a large and complex problem, and care of these patients requires multidisciplinary involvement of imaging, medical, and surgical specialties. Imaging capabilities for evaluation of men with recurrent prostate cancer are rapidly evolving, particularly with PET and MRI. At the same time, treatment options and capabilities are expanding and improving. These recommendations separate patients into three broad categories: (1) patients status post–radical prostatectomy, (2) clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after nonsurgical local and pelvic treatments, and (3) metastatic prostate. This article is a review of the current literature regarding imaging in these settings and the resulting recommendations for imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.",
keywords = "Appropriate Use Criteria, Appropriateness Criteria, AUC, Choline and fluciclovine PET, Metastatic prostate cancer, MRI, Prostate cancer, Recurrent prostate cancer",
author = "{Expert Panel on Urologic Imaging:} and Froemming, {Adam T.} and Sadhna Verma and Eberhardt, {Steven C.} and Aytekin Oto and Alexander, {Lauren F.} and Allen, {Brian C.} and Fergus Coakley and Davis, {Brian J.} and Fulgham, {Pat F.} and Keyanoosh Hosseinzadeh and Christopher Porter and Sahni, {V. Anik} and Schuster, {David M.} and Showalter, {Timothy N.} and Venkatesan, {Aradhana M.} and Wang, {Carolyn L.} and Remer, {Erick M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "S132--S149",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-treatment Follow-up Prostate Cancer

AU - Expert Panel on Urologic Imaging:

AU - Froemming, Adam T.

AU - Verma, Sadhna

AU - Eberhardt, Steven C.

AU - Oto, Aytekin

AU - Alexander, Lauren F.

AU - Allen, Brian C.

AU - Coakley, Fergus

AU - Davis, Brian J.

AU - Fulgham, Pat F.

AU - Hosseinzadeh, Keyanoosh

AU - Porter, Christopher

AU - Sahni, V. Anik

AU - Schuster, David M.

AU - Showalter, Timothy N.

AU - Venkatesan, Aradhana M.

AU - Wang, Carolyn L.

AU - Remer, Erick M.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Diagnosis and management of prostate cancer post treatment is a large and complex problem, and care of these patients requires multidisciplinary involvement of imaging, medical, and surgical specialties. Imaging capabilities for evaluation of men with recurrent prostate cancer are rapidly evolving, particularly with PET and MRI. At the same time, treatment options and capabilities are expanding and improving. These recommendations separate patients into three broad categories: (1) patients status post–radical prostatectomy, (2) clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after nonsurgical local and pelvic treatments, and (3) metastatic prostate. This article is a review of the current literature regarding imaging in these settings and the resulting recommendations for imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

AB - Diagnosis and management of prostate cancer post treatment is a large and complex problem, and care of these patients requires multidisciplinary involvement of imaging, medical, and surgical specialties. Imaging capabilities for evaluation of men with recurrent prostate cancer are rapidly evolving, particularly with PET and MRI. At the same time, treatment options and capabilities are expanding and improving. These recommendations separate patients into three broad categories: (1) patients status post–radical prostatectomy, (2) clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after nonsurgical local and pelvic treatments, and (3) metastatic prostate. This article is a review of the current literature regarding imaging in these settings and the resulting recommendations for imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

KW - Appropriate Use Criteria

KW - Appropriateness Criteria

KW - AUC

KW - Choline and fluciclovine PET

KW - Metastatic prostate cancer

KW - MRI

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Recurrent prostate cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046948088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046948088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 29724417

AN - SCOPUS:85046948088

VL - 15

SP - S132-S149

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 5

ER -