ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Suspected Spine Trauma

Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging and Musculoskeletal Imaging:

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Injuries to the cervical and thoracolumbar spine are commonly encountered in trauma patients presenting for treatment. Cervical spine injuries occur in 3% to 4% and thoracolumbar fractures in 4% to 7% of blunt trauma patients presenting to the emergency department. Clear, validated criteria exist for screening the cervical spine in blunt trauma. Screening criteria for cervical vascular injury and thoracolumbar spine injury have less validation and widespread acceptance compared with cervical spine screening. No validated criteria exist for screening of neurologic injuries in the setting of spine trauma. CT is preferred to radiographs for initial assessment of spine trauma. CT angiography and MR angiography are both acceptable in assessment for cervical vascular injury. MRI is preferred to CT myelography for assessing neurologic injury in the setting of spine trauma. MRI is usually appropriate when there is concern for ligament injury or in screening obtunded patients for cervical spine instability. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S264-S285
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Spine
Wounds and Injuries
Nervous System Trauma
Vascular System Injuries
Guidelines
Myelography
Expert Testimony
Ligaments
Radiology
Hospital Emergency Service
Angiography
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Appropriate Use Criteria
  • Appropriateness Criteria
  • AUC
  • Cervical
  • Neurologic injury
  • Spine
  • Thoracolumbar
  • Trauma
  • Vascular injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Suspected Spine Trauma . / Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging and Musculoskeletal Imaging:.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 16, No. 5, 01.05.2019, p. S264-S285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging and Musculoskeletal Imaging: 2019, ' ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Suspected Spine Trauma ', Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. S264-S285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.002
Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging and Musculoskeletal Imaging:. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Suspected Spine Trauma Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019 May 1;16(5):S264-S285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.002
Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging and Musculoskeletal Imaging:. / ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Suspected Spine Trauma In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019 ; Vol. 16, No. 5. pp. S264-S285.
@article{97c0f7a494054193bd715d3f520dcc65,
title = "ACR Appropriateness Criteria {\circledR} Suspected Spine Trauma",
abstract = "Injuries to the cervical and thoracolumbar spine are commonly encountered in trauma patients presenting for treatment. Cervical spine injuries occur in 3{\%} to 4{\%} and thoracolumbar fractures in 4{\%} to 7{\%} of blunt trauma patients presenting to the emergency department. Clear, validated criteria exist for screening the cervical spine in blunt trauma. Screening criteria for cervical vascular injury and thoracolumbar spine injury have less validation and widespread acceptance compared with cervical spine screening. No validated criteria exist for screening of neurologic injuries in the setting of spine trauma. CT is preferred to radiographs for initial assessment of spine trauma. CT angiography and MR angiography are both acceptable in assessment for cervical vascular injury. MRI is preferred to CT myelography for assessing neurologic injury in the setting of spine trauma. MRI is usually appropriate when there is concern for ligament injury or in screening obtunded patients for cervical spine instability. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.",
keywords = "Appropriate Use Criteria, Appropriateness Criteria, AUC, Cervical, Neurologic injury, Spine, Thoracolumbar, Trauma, Vascular injury",
author = "{Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging and Musculoskeletal Imaging:} and Beckmann, {Nicholas M.} and West, {O. Clark} and Diego Nunez and Kirsch, {Claudia F.E.} and Aulino, {Joseph M.} and Broder, {Joshua S.} and Cassidy, {R. Carter} and Czuczman, {Gregory J.} and Demertzis, {Jennifer L.} and Johnson, {Michele M.} and Kambiz Motamedi and Charles Reitman and Shah, {Lubdha M.} and Khoi Than and {Ying-Kou Yung}, Elizabeth and Beaman, {Francesca D.} and Kransdorf, {Mark J.} and Julie Bykowski",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "S264--S285",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Suspected Spine Trauma

AU - Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging and Musculoskeletal Imaging:

AU - Beckmann, Nicholas M.

AU - West, O. Clark

AU - Nunez, Diego

AU - Kirsch, Claudia F.E.

AU - Aulino, Joseph M.

AU - Broder, Joshua S.

AU - Cassidy, R. Carter

AU - Czuczman, Gregory J.

AU - Demertzis, Jennifer L.

AU - Johnson, Michele M.

AU - Motamedi, Kambiz

AU - Reitman, Charles

AU - Shah, Lubdha M.

AU - Than, Khoi

AU - Ying-Kou Yung, Elizabeth

AU - Beaman, Francesca D.

AU - Kransdorf, Mark J.

AU - Bykowski, Julie

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Injuries to the cervical and thoracolumbar spine are commonly encountered in trauma patients presenting for treatment. Cervical spine injuries occur in 3% to 4% and thoracolumbar fractures in 4% to 7% of blunt trauma patients presenting to the emergency department. Clear, validated criteria exist for screening the cervical spine in blunt trauma. Screening criteria for cervical vascular injury and thoracolumbar spine injury have less validation and widespread acceptance compared with cervical spine screening. No validated criteria exist for screening of neurologic injuries in the setting of spine trauma. CT is preferred to radiographs for initial assessment of spine trauma. CT angiography and MR angiography are both acceptable in assessment for cervical vascular injury. MRI is preferred to CT myelography for assessing neurologic injury in the setting of spine trauma. MRI is usually appropriate when there is concern for ligament injury or in screening obtunded patients for cervical spine instability. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

AB - Injuries to the cervical and thoracolumbar spine are commonly encountered in trauma patients presenting for treatment. Cervical spine injuries occur in 3% to 4% and thoracolumbar fractures in 4% to 7% of blunt trauma patients presenting to the emergency department. Clear, validated criteria exist for screening the cervical spine in blunt trauma. Screening criteria for cervical vascular injury and thoracolumbar spine injury have less validation and widespread acceptance compared with cervical spine screening. No validated criteria exist for screening of neurologic injuries in the setting of spine trauma. CT is preferred to radiographs for initial assessment of spine trauma. CT angiography and MR angiography are both acceptable in assessment for cervical vascular injury. MRI is preferred to CT myelography for assessing neurologic injury in the setting of spine trauma. MRI is usually appropriate when there is concern for ligament injury or in screening obtunded patients for cervical spine instability. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

KW - Appropriate Use Criteria

KW - Appropriateness Criteria

KW - AUC

KW - Cervical

KW - Neurologic injury

KW - Spine

KW - Thoracolumbar

KW - Trauma

KW - Vascular injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064494429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064494429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.002

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - S264-S285

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 5

ER -