ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Local Excision in Early Stage Rectal Cancer

Suzanne Russo, A. William Blackstock, Joseph M. Herman, May Abdel-Wahab, Nilofer Azad, Prajnan Das, Karyn A. Goodman, Theodore S. Hong, Salma K. Jabbour, William E. Jones, Andre A. Konski, Albert C. Koong, Rachit Kumar, Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas, William Small, Charles Thomas, W. Warren Suh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection are considered standard treatments for early rectal cancer but may be associated with morbidity in selected patients who are candidates for early distal lesions amenable to local excision (LE). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The panel recognizes the importance of accurate staging to identify patients who may be candidates for a LE approach. Patients who may be candidates for LE alone include those with small, low-lying T1 tumors, without adverse pathologic features. Several surgical approaches can be utilized for LE however none include lymph node evaluation. Adjuvant radiation±chemotherapy may be warranted depending on the risk of nodal metastases. Patients with high-risk T1 tumors, T2 tumors not amenable to radical surgery may also benefit from adjuvant treatment; however, patients with positive margins or T3 lesions should be offered abdominoperineal resection or low anterior resection. Neoadjuvant radiation±chemotherapy followed by LE in higher risk patients results in excellent local control, but it is not clear if this approach reduces recurrence rates over surgery alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)520-525
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Rectal Neoplasms
Guidelines
Neoplasms
Expert Testimony
Therapeutics
Radiology
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Metastasis
Morbidity
Recurrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Russo, S., Blackstock, A. W., Herman, J. M., Abdel-Wahab, M., Azad, N., Das, P., ... Suh, W. W. (2015). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Local Excision in Early Stage Rectal Cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(5), 520-525. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000197

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Local Excision in Early Stage Rectal Cancer. / Russo, Suzanne; Blackstock, A. William; Herman, Joseph M.; Abdel-Wahab, May; Azad, Nilofer; Das, Prajnan; Goodman, Karyn A.; Hong, Theodore S.; Jabbour, Salma K.; Jones, William E.; Konski, Andre A.; Koong, Albert C.; Kumar, Rachit; Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel; Small, William; Thomas, Charles; Suh, W. Warren.

In: American Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 38, No. 5, 01.10.2015, p. 520-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Russo, S, Blackstock, AW, Herman, JM, Abdel-Wahab, M, Azad, N, Das, P, Goodman, KA, Hong, TS, Jabbour, SK, Jones, WE, Konski, AA, Koong, AC, Kumar, R, Rodriguez-Bigas, M, Small, W, Thomas, C & Suh, WW 2015, 'ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Local Excision in Early Stage Rectal Cancer', American Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 520-525. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000197
Russo, Suzanne ; Blackstock, A. William ; Herman, Joseph M. ; Abdel-Wahab, May ; Azad, Nilofer ; Das, Prajnan ; Goodman, Karyn A. ; Hong, Theodore S. ; Jabbour, Salma K. ; Jones, William E. ; Konski, Andre A. ; Koong, Albert C. ; Kumar, Rachit ; Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel ; Small, William ; Thomas, Charles ; Suh, W. Warren. / ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Local Excision in Early Stage Rectal Cancer. In: American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015 ; Vol. 38, No. 5. pp. 520-525.
@article{28e3d17591cf458b85bdd6a836cb88bc,
title = "ACR Appropriateness Criteria{\circledR} Local Excision in Early Stage Rectal Cancer",
abstract = "Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection are considered standard treatments for early rectal cancer but may be associated with morbidity in selected patients who are candidates for early distal lesions amenable to local excision (LE). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The panel recognizes the importance of accurate staging to identify patients who may be candidates for a LE approach. Patients who may be candidates for LE alone include those with small, low-lying T1 tumors, without adverse pathologic features. Several surgical approaches can be utilized for LE however none include lymph node evaluation. Adjuvant radiation±chemotherapy may be warranted depending on the risk of nodal metastases. Patients with high-risk T1 tumors, T2 tumors not amenable to radical surgery may also benefit from adjuvant treatment; however, patients with positive margins or T3 lesions should be offered abdominoperineal resection or low anterior resection. Neoadjuvant radiation±chemotherapy followed by LE in higher risk patients results in excellent local control, but it is not clear if this approach reduces recurrence rates over surgery alone.",
author = "Suzanne Russo and Blackstock, {A. William} and Herman, {Joseph M.} and May Abdel-Wahab and Nilofer Azad and Prajnan Das and Goodman, {Karyn A.} and Hong, {Theodore S.} and Jabbour, {Salma K.} and Jones, {William E.} and Konski, {Andre A.} and Koong, {Albert C.} and Rachit Kumar and Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas and William Small and Charles Thomas and Suh, {W. Warren}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/COC.0000000000000197",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "520--525",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0277-3732",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Local Excision in Early Stage Rectal Cancer

AU - Russo, Suzanne

AU - Blackstock, A. William

AU - Herman, Joseph M.

AU - Abdel-Wahab, May

AU - Azad, Nilofer

AU - Das, Prajnan

AU - Goodman, Karyn A.

AU - Hong, Theodore S.

AU - Jabbour, Salma K.

AU - Jones, William E.

AU - Konski, Andre A.

AU - Koong, Albert C.

AU - Kumar, Rachit

AU - Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel

AU - Small, William

AU - Thomas, Charles

AU - Suh, W. Warren

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection are considered standard treatments for early rectal cancer but may be associated with morbidity in selected patients who are candidates for early distal lesions amenable to local excision (LE). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The panel recognizes the importance of accurate staging to identify patients who may be candidates for a LE approach. Patients who may be candidates for LE alone include those with small, low-lying T1 tumors, without adverse pathologic features. Several surgical approaches can be utilized for LE however none include lymph node evaluation. Adjuvant radiation±chemotherapy may be warranted depending on the risk of nodal metastases. Patients with high-risk T1 tumors, T2 tumors not amenable to radical surgery may also benefit from adjuvant treatment; however, patients with positive margins or T3 lesions should be offered abdominoperineal resection or low anterior resection. Neoadjuvant radiation±chemotherapy followed by LE in higher risk patients results in excellent local control, but it is not clear if this approach reduces recurrence rates over surgery alone.

AB - Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection are considered standard treatments for early rectal cancer but may be associated with morbidity in selected patients who are candidates for early distal lesions amenable to local excision (LE). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The panel recognizes the importance of accurate staging to identify patients who may be candidates for a LE approach. Patients who may be candidates for LE alone include those with small, low-lying T1 tumors, without adverse pathologic features. Several surgical approaches can be utilized for LE however none include lymph node evaluation. Adjuvant radiation±chemotherapy may be warranted depending on the risk of nodal metastases. Patients with high-risk T1 tumors, T2 tumors not amenable to radical surgery may also benefit from adjuvant treatment; however, patients with positive margins or T3 lesions should be offered abdominoperineal resection or low anterior resection. Neoadjuvant radiation±chemotherapy followed by LE in higher risk patients results in excellent local control, but it is not clear if this approach reduces recurrence rates over surgery alone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979861931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979861931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/COC.0000000000000197

DO - 10.1097/COC.0000000000000197

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26371522

AN - SCOPUS:84979861931

VL - 38

SP - 520

EP - 525

JO - American Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - American Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0277-3732

IS - 5

ER -