Acoustic responses of vestibular afferents in a model of superior canal dehiscence

John P. Carey, Timo P. Hirvonen, Timothy Hullar, Lloyd B. Minor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis: Afferents innervating the superior semicircular canal are rendered especially sensitive to acoustic stimulation when there is a dehiscence of the superior canal. Other vestibular end organs are also more sensitive to acoustic stimulation. Background: Dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal is associated with vertigo and nystagmus caused by loud sounds (Tullio phenomenon) or changes in middle ear or intracranial pressures. The mechanisms by which acoustic stimuli act on the vestibular end organs are unclear. The nystagmus caused by acoustic stimuli generally aligns with the affected superior canal. Methods: Responses to acoustic stimuli in the superior vestibular nerves of anesthetized chinchillas were recorded before and after fenestration of the superior canal. Results: Two acoustic response patterns were seen: rapid phase locking and slow tonic changes in firing rate. Phasic responses principally occurred in irregular afferents and tonic responses in regular afferents. Afferents from all of the vestibular end organs encountered could respond to acoustic stimuli, even before fenestration. However, fenestration lowered the thresholds for acoustic stimulation in superior canal afferents with phasic responses and increased the magnitude of tonic responses. Conclusions: Superior canal dehiscence may render the irregular afferents innervating the superior canal particularly sensitive to loud sounds. Rapid phase-locking responses may explain the short latency of nystagmus seen in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome. The mechanisms by which acoustic stimuli activate the vestibular end organs may differ from the damped endolymph motion associated with head acceleration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-352
Number of pages8
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Acoustics
Acoustic Stimulation
Semicircular Canals
Endolymph
Chinchilla
Vestibular Nerve
Vertigo
Intracranial Pressure
Middle Ear
Head

Keywords

  • Hair cells
  • Labyrinth
  • Nystagmus
  • Saccule and utricle
  • Semicircular canals
  • Vertigo

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Acoustic responses of vestibular afferents in a model of superior canal dehiscence. / Carey, John P.; Hirvonen, Timo P.; Hullar, Timothy; Minor, Lloyd B.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 05.2004, p. 345-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carey, John P. ; Hirvonen, Timo P. ; Hullar, Timothy ; Minor, Lloyd B. / Acoustic responses of vestibular afferents in a model of superior canal dehiscence. In: Otology and Neurotology. 2004 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 345-352.
@article{1edf42bb379b4d7d832022b680d65b39,
title = "Acoustic responses of vestibular afferents in a model of superior canal dehiscence",
abstract = "Hypothesis: Afferents innervating the superior semicircular canal are rendered especially sensitive to acoustic stimulation when there is a dehiscence of the superior canal. Other vestibular end organs are also more sensitive to acoustic stimulation. Background: Dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal is associated with vertigo and nystagmus caused by loud sounds (Tullio phenomenon) or changes in middle ear or intracranial pressures. The mechanisms by which acoustic stimuli act on the vestibular end organs are unclear. The nystagmus caused by acoustic stimuli generally aligns with the affected superior canal. Methods: Responses to acoustic stimuli in the superior vestibular nerves of anesthetized chinchillas were recorded before and after fenestration of the superior canal. Results: Two acoustic response patterns were seen: rapid phase locking and slow tonic changes in firing rate. Phasic responses principally occurred in irregular afferents and tonic responses in regular afferents. Afferents from all of the vestibular end organs encountered could respond to acoustic stimuli, even before fenestration. However, fenestration lowered the thresholds for acoustic stimulation in superior canal afferents with phasic responses and increased the magnitude of tonic responses. Conclusions: Superior canal dehiscence may render the irregular afferents innervating the superior canal particularly sensitive to loud sounds. Rapid phase-locking responses may explain the short latency of nystagmus seen in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome. The mechanisms by which acoustic stimuli activate the vestibular end organs may differ from the damped endolymph motion associated with head acceleration.",
keywords = "Hair cells, Labyrinth, Nystagmus, Saccule and utricle, Semicircular canals, Vertigo",
author = "Carey, {John P.} and Hirvonen, {Timo P.} and Timothy Hullar and Minor, {Lloyd B.}",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/00129492-200405000-00024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "345--352",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acoustic responses of vestibular afferents in a model of superior canal dehiscence

AU - Carey, John P.

AU - Hirvonen, Timo P.

AU - Hullar, Timothy

AU - Minor, Lloyd B.

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - Hypothesis: Afferents innervating the superior semicircular canal are rendered especially sensitive to acoustic stimulation when there is a dehiscence of the superior canal. Other vestibular end organs are also more sensitive to acoustic stimulation. Background: Dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal is associated with vertigo and nystagmus caused by loud sounds (Tullio phenomenon) or changes in middle ear or intracranial pressures. The mechanisms by which acoustic stimuli act on the vestibular end organs are unclear. The nystagmus caused by acoustic stimuli generally aligns with the affected superior canal. Methods: Responses to acoustic stimuli in the superior vestibular nerves of anesthetized chinchillas were recorded before and after fenestration of the superior canal. Results: Two acoustic response patterns were seen: rapid phase locking and slow tonic changes in firing rate. Phasic responses principally occurred in irregular afferents and tonic responses in regular afferents. Afferents from all of the vestibular end organs encountered could respond to acoustic stimuli, even before fenestration. However, fenestration lowered the thresholds for acoustic stimulation in superior canal afferents with phasic responses and increased the magnitude of tonic responses. Conclusions: Superior canal dehiscence may render the irregular afferents innervating the superior canal particularly sensitive to loud sounds. Rapid phase-locking responses may explain the short latency of nystagmus seen in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome. The mechanisms by which acoustic stimuli activate the vestibular end organs may differ from the damped endolymph motion associated with head acceleration.

AB - Hypothesis: Afferents innervating the superior semicircular canal are rendered especially sensitive to acoustic stimulation when there is a dehiscence of the superior canal. Other vestibular end organs are also more sensitive to acoustic stimulation. Background: Dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal is associated with vertigo and nystagmus caused by loud sounds (Tullio phenomenon) or changes in middle ear or intracranial pressures. The mechanisms by which acoustic stimuli act on the vestibular end organs are unclear. The nystagmus caused by acoustic stimuli generally aligns with the affected superior canal. Methods: Responses to acoustic stimuli in the superior vestibular nerves of anesthetized chinchillas were recorded before and after fenestration of the superior canal. Results: Two acoustic response patterns were seen: rapid phase locking and slow tonic changes in firing rate. Phasic responses principally occurred in irregular afferents and tonic responses in regular afferents. Afferents from all of the vestibular end organs encountered could respond to acoustic stimuli, even before fenestration. However, fenestration lowered the thresholds for acoustic stimulation in superior canal afferents with phasic responses and increased the magnitude of tonic responses. Conclusions: Superior canal dehiscence may render the irregular afferents innervating the superior canal particularly sensitive to loud sounds. Rapid phase-locking responses may explain the short latency of nystagmus seen in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome. The mechanisms by which acoustic stimuli activate the vestibular end organs may differ from the damped endolymph motion associated with head acceleration.

KW - Hair cells

KW - Labyrinth

KW - Nystagmus

KW - Saccule and utricle

KW - Semicircular canals

KW - Vertigo

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4043147343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4043147343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00129492-200405000-00024

DO - 10.1097/00129492-200405000-00024

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 345

EP - 352

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 3

ER -