Accurate label-free protein quantitation with high- and low-resolution mass spectrometers

Jocelyn F. Krey, Phillip Wilmarth, Jung Bum Shin, John Klimek, Nicholas E. Sherman, Erin D. Jeffery, Dongseok Choi, Larry David, Peter Barr-Gillespie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Label-free quantitation of proteins analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry uses either integrated peak intensity from the parent-ion mass analysis (MS1) or features from fragment-ion analysis (MS2), such as spectral counts or summed fragment-ion intensity. We directly compared MS1 and MS2 quantitation by analyzing human protein standards diluted into Escherichia coli extracts on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. We found that summed MS2 intensities were nearly as accurate as integrated MS1 intensities, and both outperformed MS2 spectral counting in accuracy and linearity. We compared these results to those obtained from two low-resolution ion-trap mass spectrometers; summed MS2 intensities from LTQ and LTQ Velos instruments were similar in accuracy to those from the Orbitrap. Data from all three instruments are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000602. Abundance measurements using MS1 or MS2 intensities had limitations, however. While measured protein concentration was on average well-correlated with the known concentration, there was considerable protein-to-protein variation. Moreover, not all human proteins diluted to a mole fraction of 10-3 or lower were detected, with a strong falloff below 10-4 mole fraction. These results show that MS1 and MS2 intensities are simple measures of protein abundance that are on average accurate but should be limited to quantitation of proteins of intermediate to higher fractional abundance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1034-1044
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Proteome Research
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 7 2014

Fingerprint

Mass spectrometers
Labels
Ions
Proteins
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Escherichia coli
Mass spectrometry

Keywords

  • intensity
  • ion trap
  • Orbitrap
  • spectral counts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Chemistry(all)

Cite this

Accurate label-free protein quantitation with high- and low-resolution mass spectrometers. / Krey, Jocelyn F.; Wilmarth, Phillip; Shin, Jung Bum; Klimek, John; Sherman, Nicholas E.; Jeffery, Erin D.; Choi, Dongseok; David, Larry; Barr-Gillespie, Peter.

In: Journal of Proteome Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, 07.02.2014, p. 1034-1044.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krey, Jocelyn F. ; Wilmarth, Phillip ; Shin, Jung Bum ; Klimek, John ; Sherman, Nicholas E. ; Jeffery, Erin D. ; Choi, Dongseok ; David, Larry ; Barr-Gillespie, Peter. / Accurate label-free protein quantitation with high- and low-resolution mass spectrometers. In: Journal of Proteome Research. 2014 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 1034-1044.
@article{638ed2cd261e4b43a58997d206aae734,
title = "Accurate label-free protein quantitation with high- and low-resolution mass spectrometers",
abstract = "Label-free quantitation of proteins analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry uses either integrated peak intensity from the parent-ion mass analysis (MS1) or features from fragment-ion analysis (MS2), such as spectral counts or summed fragment-ion intensity. We directly compared MS1 and MS2 quantitation by analyzing human protein standards diluted into Escherichia coli extracts on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. We found that summed MS2 intensities were nearly as accurate as integrated MS1 intensities, and both outperformed MS2 spectral counting in accuracy and linearity. We compared these results to those obtained from two low-resolution ion-trap mass spectrometers; summed MS2 intensities from LTQ and LTQ Velos instruments were similar in accuracy to those from the Orbitrap. Data from all three instruments are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000602. Abundance measurements using MS1 or MS2 intensities had limitations, however. While measured protein concentration was on average well-correlated with the known concentration, there was considerable protein-to-protein variation. Moreover, not all human proteins diluted to a mole fraction of 10-3 or lower were detected, with a strong falloff below 10-4 mole fraction. These results show that MS1 and MS2 intensities are simple measures of protein abundance that are on average accurate but should be limited to quantitation of proteins of intermediate to higher fractional abundance.",
keywords = "intensity, ion trap, Orbitrap, spectral counts",
author = "Krey, {Jocelyn F.} and Phillip Wilmarth and Shin, {Jung Bum} and John Klimek and Sherman, {Nicholas E.} and Jeffery, {Erin D.} and Dongseok Choi and Larry David and Peter Barr-Gillespie",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1021/pr401017h",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1034--1044",
journal = "Journal of Proteome Research",
issn = "1535-3893",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accurate label-free protein quantitation with high- and low-resolution mass spectrometers

AU - Krey, Jocelyn F.

AU - Wilmarth, Phillip

AU - Shin, Jung Bum

AU - Klimek, John

AU - Sherman, Nicholas E.

AU - Jeffery, Erin D.

AU - Choi, Dongseok

AU - David, Larry

AU - Barr-Gillespie, Peter

PY - 2014/2/7

Y1 - 2014/2/7

N2 - Label-free quantitation of proteins analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry uses either integrated peak intensity from the parent-ion mass analysis (MS1) or features from fragment-ion analysis (MS2), such as spectral counts or summed fragment-ion intensity. We directly compared MS1 and MS2 quantitation by analyzing human protein standards diluted into Escherichia coli extracts on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. We found that summed MS2 intensities were nearly as accurate as integrated MS1 intensities, and both outperformed MS2 spectral counting in accuracy and linearity. We compared these results to those obtained from two low-resolution ion-trap mass spectrometers; summed MS2 intensities from LTQ and LTQ Velos instruments were similar in accuracy to those from the Orbitrap. Data from all three instruments are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000602. Abundance measurements using MS1 or MS2 intensities had limitations, however. While measured protein concentration was on average well-correlated with the known concentration, there was considerable protein-to-protein variation. Moreover, not all human proteins diluted to a mole fraction of 10-3 or lower were detected, with a strong falloff below 10-4 mole fraction. These results show that MS1 and MS2 intensities are simple measures of protein abundance that are on average accurate but should be limited to quantitation of proteins of intermediate to higher fractional abundance.

AB - Label-free quantitation of proteins analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry uses either integrated peak intensity from the parent-ion mass analysis (MS1) or features from fragment-ion analysis (MS2), such as spectral counts or summed fragment-ion intensity. We directly compared MS1 and MS2 quantitation by analyzing human protein standards diluted into Escherichia coli extracts on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. We found that summed MS2 intensities were nearly as accurate as integrated MS1 intensities, and both outperformed MS2 spectral counting in accuracy and linearity. We compared these results to those obtained from two low-resolution ion-trap mass spectrometers; summed MS2 intensities from LTQ and LTQ Velos instruments were similar in accuracy to those from the Orbitrap. Data from all three instruments are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000602. Abundance measurements using MS1 or MS2 intensities had limitations, however. While measured protein concentration was on average well-correlated with the known concentration, there was considerable protein-to-protein variation. Moreover, not all human proteins diluted to a mole fraction of 10-3 or lower were detected, with a strong falloff below 10-4 mole fraction. These results show that MS1 and MS2 intensities are simple measures of protein abundance that are on average accurate but should be limited to quantitation of proteins of intermediate to higher fractional abundance.

KW - intensity

KW - ion trap

KW - Orbitrap

KW - spectral counts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893864851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893864851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/pr401017h

DO - 10.1021/pr401017h

M3 - Article

C2 - 24295401

AN - SCOPUS:84893864851

VL - 13

SP - 1034

EP - 1044

JO - Journal of Proteome Research

JF - Journal of Proteome Research

SN - 1535-3893

IS - 2

ER -