Accuracy of chemical dot thermometers in critically ill adults and young children

Roberta S. Erickson, Linda Meyer, Teri Moser Woo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chemical dot thermometers are used widely, but their clinical accuracy is not well documented. Temperature measurements with chemical dot and electronic thermometers were compared at the oral site in 27 adults and the axillary site in 44 adults and 34 young children in critical care units. In adults, mean readings with chemical dot thermometers were lower by -0.4°C orally, but higher by 0.4°C in the axilla. Axillary readings in children did not differ significantly with the two methods, although individual differences of ±0.4°C or more were common. Chemical dot thermometers provided rough temperature estimates, performing differently at the oral and axillary sites and in the two age groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-28
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Nursing Scholarship
Volume28
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1996

Fingerprint

Thermometers
Critical Illness
Young Adult
Reading
Axilla
Temperature
Critical Care
Individuality
Age Groups

Keywords

  • Body temperature
  • Temperature measurement
  • Thermometers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Accuracy of chemical dot thermometers in critically ill adults and young children. / Erickson, Roberta S.; Meyer, Linda; Woo, Teri Moser.

In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Vol. 28, No. 1, 03.1996, p. 23-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4285fee3d2de487d8cd1c82e8abd9931,
title = "Accuracy of chemical dot thermometers in critically ill adults and young children",
abstract = "Chemical dot thermometers are used widely, but their clinical accuracy is not well documented. Temperature measurements with chemical dot and electronic thermometers were compared at the oral site in 27 adults and the axillary site in 44 adults and 34 young children in critical care units. In adults, mean readings with chemical dot thermometers were lower by -0.4°C orally, but higher by 0.4°C in the axilla. Axillary readings in children did not differ significantly with the two methods, although individual differences of ±0.4°C or more were common. Chemical dot thermometers provided rough temperature estimates, performing differently at the oral and axillary sites and in the two age groups.",
keywords = "Body temperature, Temperature measurement, Thermometers",
author = "Erickson, {Roberta S.} and Linda Meyer and Woo, {Teri Moser}",
year = "1996",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "23--28",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Scholarship",
issn = "1527-6546",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of chemical dot thermometers in critically ill adults and young children

AU - Erickson, Roberta S.

AU - Meyer, Linda

AU - Woo, Teri Moser

PY - 1996/3

Y1 - 1996/3

N2 - Chemical dot thermometers are used widely, but their clinical accuracy is not well documented. Temperature measurements with chemical dot and electronic thermometers were compared at the oral site in 27 adults and the axillary site in 44 adults and 34 young children in critical care units. In adults, mean readings with chemical dot thermometers were lower by -0.4°C orally, but higher by 0.4°C in the axilla. Axillary readings in children did not differ significantly with the two methods, although individual differences of ±0.4°C or more were common. Chemical dot thermometers provided rough temperature estimates, performing differently at the oral and axillary sites and in the two age groups.

AB - Chemical dot thermometers are used widely, but their clinical accuracy is not well documented. Temperature measurements with chemical dot and electronic thermometers were compared at the oral site in 27 adults and the axillary site in 44 adults and 34 young children in critical care units. In adults, mean readings with chemical dot thermometers were lower by -0.4°C orally, but higher by 0.4°C in the axilla. Axillary readings in children did not differ significantly with the two methods, although individual differences of ±0.4°C or more were common. Chemical dot thermometers provided rough temperature estimates, performing differently at the oral and axillary sites and in the two age groups.

KW - Body temperature

KW - Temperature measurement

KW - Thermometers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030090297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030090297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8907658

AN - SCOPUS:0030090297

VL - 28

SP - 23

EP - 28

JO - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

JF - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

SN - 1527-6546

IS - 1

ER -