Accuracy and interobserver agreement for determinations of rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion

Albert Juang Ming Yee, Hyun W. Bae, Darin Friess, Mark Robbin, Brian Johnstone, Jung Yoo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. The accuracy and interobserver agreement of fine detail radiography and computed tomography (CT) determination of spinal fusion were evaluated in an established animal spine fusion model. Objective. To determine the accuracy and interobserver agreement of radiographic determinations of spinal fusion in rabbit posterolateral spine fusion. Summary of Background Data. The rabbit posterolateral intertransverse process spine fusion model is an established animal model for evaluating bone graft alternatives for spinal fusion. However, little is known regarding the accuracy and interobserver agreement of radiographic determinations of spondylodesis in this model. Methods. Forty-two New Zealand White rabbits underwent posterolateral spinal fusion. The animals were killed at 9 weeks and the lumbar spine harvested. Manual manipulation, fine detail radiography, and CT images were used to assess spinal fusion. Results. Using manual palpation testing as the standard by which to assess fusion, there was high sensitivity and negative predictive value for both radiographic methods. Positive predictive value, however, was poor (26% fine detail radiography, 61% CT scan). CT correlated better with manual palpation testing when compared with fine detail radiographs. There was substantial interobserver agreement of successful fusion using CT scan imaging (kappa = 0.63) and moderate interobserver agreement radiographs (kappa = 0.52). Conclusions. Both radiographic techniques used in the study recorded high sensitivity and negative predictive value. However, positive predictive value was poor, especially with fine detail radiographs. Nevertheless, CT with reformatted images did appear to be superior to fine detail radiographs in accurately identifying nonunions in this animal model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1308-1313
Number of pages6
JournalSpine
Volume29
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2004

Fingerprint

Spinal Fusion
Tomography
Rabbits
Spine
Radiography
Palpation
Animal Models
Transplants
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Bone graft
  • Interobserver agreement
  • Spine fusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Accuracy and interobserver agreement for determinations of rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion. / Yee, Albert Juang Ming; Bae, Hyun W.; Friess, Darin; Robbin, Mark; Johnstone, Brian; Yoo, Jung.

In: Spine, Vol. 29, No. 12, 15.06.2004, p. 1308-1313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yee, Albert Juang Ming ; Bae, Hyun W. ; Friess, Darin ; Robbin, Mark ; Johnstone, Brian ; Yoo, Jung. / Accuracy and interobserver agreement for determinations of rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion. In: Spine. 2004 ; Vol. 29, No. 12. pp. 1308-1313.
@article{da42fc42b8e74b01bfbfae36dea9a052,
title = "Accuracy and interobserver agreement for determinations of rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion",
abstract = "Study Design. The accuracy and interobserver agreement of fine detail radiography and computed tomography (CT) determination of spinal fusion were evaluated in an established animal spine fusion model. Objective. To determine the accuracy and interobserver agreement of radiographic determinations of spinal fusion in rabbit posterolateral spine fusion. Summary of Background Data. The rabbit posterolateral intertransverse process spine fusion model is an established animal model for evaluating bone graft alternatives for spinal fusion. However, little is known regarding the accuracy and interobserver agreement of radiographic determinations of spondylodesis in this model. Methods. Forty-two New Zealand White rabbits underwent posterolateral spinal fusion. The animals were killed at 9 weeks and the lumbar spine harvested. Manual manipulation, fine detail radiography, and CT images were used to assess spinal fusion. Results. Using manual palpation testing as the standard by which to assess fusion, there was high sensitivity and negative predictive value for both radiographic methods. Positive predictive value, however, was poor (26{\%} fine detail radiography, 61{\%} CT scan). CT correlated better with manual palpation testing when compared with fine detail radiographs. There was substantial interobserver agreement of successful fusion using CT scan imaging (kappa = 0.63) and moderate interobserver agreement radiographs (kappa = 0.52). Conclusions. Both radiographic techniques used in the study recorded high sensitivity and negative predictive value. However, positive predictive value was poor, especially with fine detail radiographs. Nevertheless, CT with reformatted images did appear to be superior to fine detail radiographs in accurately identifying nonunions in this animal model.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Bone graft, Interobserver agreement, Spine fusion",
author = "Yee, {Albert Juang Ming} and Bae, {Hyun W.} and Darin Friess and Mark Robbin and Brian Johnstone and Jung Yoo",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/01.BRS.0000127184.43765.61",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1308--1313",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy and interobserver agreement for determinations of rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion

AU - Yee, Albert Juang Ming

AU - Bae, Hyun W.

AU - Friess, Darin

AU - Robbin, Mark

AU - Johnstone, Brian

AU - Yoo, Jung

PY - 2004/6/15

Y1 - 2004/6/15

N2 - Study Design. The accuracy and interobserver agreement of fine detail radiography and computed tomography (CT) determination of spinal fusion were evaluated in an established animal spine fusion model. Objective. To determine the accuracy and interobserver agreement of radiographic determinations of spinal fusion in rabbit posterolateral spine fusion. Summary of Background Data. The rabbit posterolateral intertransverse process spine fusion model is an established animal model for evaluating bone graft alternatives for spinal fusion. However, little is known regarding the accuracy and interobserver agreement of radiographic determinations of spondylodesis in this model. Methods. Forty-two New Zealand White rabbits underwent posterolateral spinal fusion. The animals were killed at 9 weeks and the lumbar spine harvested. Manual manipulation, fine detail radiography, and CT images were used to assess spinal fusion. Results. Using manual palpation testing as the standard by which to assess fusion, there was high sensitivity and negative predictive value for both radiographic methods. Positive predictive value, however, was poor (26% fine detail radiography, 61% CT scan). CT correlated better with manual palpation testing when compared with fine detail radiographs. There was substantial interobserver agreement of successful fusion using CT scan imaging (kappa = 0.63) and moderate interobserver agreement radiographs (kappa = 0.52). Conclusions. Both radiographic techniques used in the study recorded high sensitivity and negative predictive value. However, positive predictive value was poor, especially with fine detail radiographs. Nevertheless, CT with reformatted images did appear to be superior to fine detail radiographs in accurately identifying nonunions in this animal model.

AB - Study Design. The accuracy and interobserver agreement of fine detail radiography and computed tomography (CT) determination of spinal fusion were evaluated in an established animal spine fusion model. Objective. To determine the accuracy and interobserver agreement of radiographic determinations of spinal fusion in rabbit posterolateral spine fusion. Summary of Background Data. The rabbit posterolateral intertransverse process spine fusion model is an established animal model for evaluating bone graft alternatives for spinal fusion. However, little is known regarding the accuracy and interobserver agreement of radiographic determinations of spondylodesis in this model. Methods. Forty-two New Zealand White rabbits underwent posterolateral spinal fusion. The animals were killed at 9 weeks and the lumbar spine harvested. Manual manipulation, fine detail radiography, and CT images were used to assess spinal fusion. Results. Using manual palpation testing as the standard by which to assess fusion, there was high sensitivity and negative predictive value for both radiographic methods. Positive predictive value, however, was poor (26% fine detail radiography, 61% CT scan). CT correlated better with manual palpation testing when compared with fine detail radiographs. There was substantial interobserver agreement of successful fusion using CT scan imaging (kappa = 0.63) and moderate interobserver agreement radiographs (kappa = 0.52). Conclusions. Both radiographic techniques used in the study recorded high sensitivity and negative predictive value. However, positive predictive value was poor, especially with fine detail radiographs. Nevertheless, CT with reformatted images did appear to be superior to fine detail radiographs in accurately identifying nonunions in this animal model.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Bone graft

KW - Interobserver agreement

KW - Spine fusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942689226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942689226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.BRS.0000127184.43765.61

DO - 10.1097/01.BRS.0000127184.43765.61

M3 - Article

C2 - 15187630

AN - SCOPUS:2942689226

VL - 29

SP - 1308

EP - 1313

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 12

ER -