Absent fetal nasal bone: What does it mean for the euploid fetus

Stephanie Dukhovny, Louise Wilkins-Haug, Thomas D. Shipp, Carol B. Benson, Anjali J. Kaimal, Rosemary Reiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives-Our purpose was to review the outcomes of singleton pregnancies in which an absent nasal bone was noted on first- or second-trimester sonography and aneuploidy was not present. Methods-We identified singleton pregnancies from 2005 to 2011 in which an absent nasal bone was noted on sonography, aneuploidy was excluded, and newborn examinations were available for review. Sonographic reports were reviewed for anomalies, growth, and amniotic fluid volume. Newborn records were reviewed for physical examinations, complications, and radiologic or genetic tests. Results-We identified 142 fetuses with a sonographic appearance of an absent nasal bone. We excluded 52 cases with aneuploidy and 33 in which newborn examination information was unavailable. Fifty-seven cases met inclusion criteria. For 3 euploid fetuses with an absent nasal bone on sonography, the presence of additional anomalies on secondtrimester sonography ultimately signaled an adverse outcome: the presence of multiple congenital anomalies, a microdeletion syndrome, and a specific genetic diagnosis. Conclusions-All cases with adverse outcomes had additional prenatal sonographic findings. For the remainder, normal newborn examination findings provide some reassurance, especially in the setting of otherwise normal second-trimester sonographic findings. A microarray as a test for microdeletion and duplication syndromes in this situation could be considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2131-2134
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume32
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nasal Bone
Ultrasonography
Aneuploidy
Fetus
Second Pregnancy Trimester
Amniotic Fluid
Pregnancy Outcome
Physical Examination
Pregnancy
Growth

Keywords

  • Absent nasal bone
  • Euploid fetus
  • Prenatal diagnosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Dukhovny, S., Wilkins-Haug, L., Shipp, T. D., Benson, C. B., Kaimal, A. J., & Reiss, R. (2013). Absent fetal nasal bone: What does it mean for the euploid fetus. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 32(12), 2131-2134. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.32.12.2131

Absent fetal nasal bone : What does it mean for the euploid fetus. / Dukhovny, Stephanie; Wilkins-Haug, Louise; Shipp, Thomas D.; Benson, Carol B.; Kaimal, Anjali J.; Reiss, Rosemary.

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 12, 01.12.2013, p. 2131-2134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dukhovny, S, Wilkins-Haug, L, Shipp, TD, Benson, CB, Kaimal, AJ & Reiss, R 2013, 'Absent fetal nasal bone: What does it mean for the euploid fetus', Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2131-2134. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.32.12.2131
Dukhovny, Stephanie ; Wilkins-Haug, Louise ; Shipp, Thomas D. ; Benson, Carol B. ; Kaimal, Anjali J. ; Reiss, Rosemary. / Absent fetal nasal bone : What does it mean for the euploid fetus. In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 32, No. 12. pp. 2131-2134.
@article{edf50ed484c54e8e86e16acba986d156,
title = "Absent fetal nasal bone: What does it mean for the euploid fetus",
abstract = "Objectives-Our purpose was to review the outcomes of singleton pregnancies in which an absent nasal bone was noted on first- or second-trimester sonography and aneuploidy was not present. Methods-We identified singleton pregnancies from 2005 to 2011 in which an absent nasal bone was noted on sonography, aneuploidy was excluded, and newborn examinations were available for review. Sonographic reports were reviewed for anomalies, growth, and amniotic fluid volume. Newborn records were reviewed for physical examinations, complications, and radiologic or genetic tests. Results-We identified 142 fetuses with a sonographic appearance of an absent nasal bone. We excluded 52 cases with aneuploidy and 33 in which newborn examination information was unavailable. Fifty-seven cases met inclusion criteria. For 3 euploid fetuses with an absent nasal bone on sonography, the presence of additional anomalies on secondtrimester sonography ultimately signaled an adverse outcome: the presence of multiple congenital anomalies, a microdeletion syndrome, and a specific genetic diagnosis. Conclusions-All cases with adverse outcomes had additional prenatal sonographic findings. For the remainder, normal newborn examination findings provide some reassurance, especially in the setting of otherwise normal second-trimester sonographic findings. A microarray as a test for microdeletion and duplication syndromes in this situation could be considered.",
keywords = "Absent nasal bone, Euploid fetus, Prenatal diagnosis",
author = "Stephanie Dukhovny and Louise Wilkins-Haug and Shipp, {Thomas D.} and Benson, {Carol B.} and Kaimal, {Anjali J.} and Rosemary Reiss",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7863/ultra.32.12.2131",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "2131--2134",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absent fetal nasal bone

T2 - What does it mean for the euploid fetus

AU - Dukhovny, Stephanie

AU - Wilkins-Haug, Louise

AU - Shipp, Thomas D.

AU - Benson, Carol B.

AU - Kaimal, Anjali J.

AU - Reiss, Rosemary

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Objectives-Our purpose was to review the outcomes of singleton pregnancies in which an absent nasal bone was noted on first- or second-trimester sonography and aneuploidy was not present. Methods-We identified singleton pregnancies from 2005 to 2011 in which an absent nasal bone was noted on sonography, aneuploidy was excluded, and newborn examinations were available for review. Sonographic reports were reviewed for anomalies, growth, and amniotic fluid volume. Newborn records were reviewed for physical examinations, complications, and radiologic or genetic tests. Results-We identified 142 fetuses with a sonographic appearance of an absent nasal bone. We excluded 52 cases with aneuploidy and 33 in which newborn examination information was unavailable. Fifty-seven cases met inclusion criteria. For 3 euploid fetuses with an absent nasal bone on sonography, the presence of additional anomalies on secondtrimester sonography ultimately signaled an adverse outcome: the presence of multiple congenital anomalies, a microdeletion syndrome, and a specific genetic diagnosis. Conclusions-All cases with adverse outcomes had additional prenatal sonographic findings. For the remainder, normal newborn examination findings provide some reassurance, especially in the setting of otherwise normal second-trimester sonographic findings. A microarray as a test for microdeletion and duplication syndromes in this situation could be considered.

AB - Objectives-Our purpose was to review the outcomes of singleton pregnancies in which an absent nasal bone was noted on first- or second-trimester sonography and aneuploidy was not present. Methods-We identified singleton pregnancies from 2005 to 2011 in which an absent nasal bone was noted on sonography, aneuploidy was excluded, and newborn examinations were available for review. Sonographic reports were reviewed for anomalies, growth, and amniotic fluid volume. Newborn records were reviewed for physical examinations, complications, and radiologic or genetic tests. Results-We identified 142 fetuses with a sonographic appearance of an absent nasal bone. We excluded 52 cases with aneuploidy and 33 in which newborn examination information was unavailable. Fifty-seven cases met inclusion criteria. For 3 euploid fetuses with an absent nasal bone on sonography, the presence of additional anomalies on secondtrimester sonography ultimately signaled an adverse outcome: the presence of multiple congenital anomalies, a microdeletion syndrome, and a specific genetic diagnosis. Conclusions-All cases with adverse outcomes had additional prenatal sonographic findings. For the remainder, normal newborn examination findings provide some reassurance, especially in the setting of otherwise normal second-trimester sonographic findings. A microarray as a test for microdeletion and duplication syndromes in this situation could be considered.

KW - Absent nasal bone

KW - Euploid fetus

KW - Prenatal diagnosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890906693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890906693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7863/ultra.32.12.2131

DO - 10.7863/ultra.32.12.2131

M3 - Article

C2 - 24277895

AN - SCOPUS:84890906693

VL - 32

SP - 2131

EP - 2134

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 12

ER -