A writer's guide to education scholarship

Qualitative education scholarship (part 2)

Teresa M. Chan, Daniel K. Ting, Andrew Koch Hall, Aleisha Murnaghan, Brent Thoma, Jill McEwen, Lalena Yarris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Education scholarship can be conducted using a variety of methods, from quantitative experiments to qualitative studies. Qualitative methods are less commonly used in emergency medicine (EM) education research but are well-suited to explore complex educational problems and generate hypotheses. We aimed to review the literature to provide resources to guide educators who wish to conduct qualitative research in EM education. Methods We conducted a scoping review to outline: 1) a list of journals that regularly publish qualitative educational papers; 2) an aggregate set of quality markers for qualitative educational research and scholarship; and 3) a list of quality checklists for qualitative educational research and scholarship. Results We found nine journals that have published more than one qualitative educational research paper in EM. From the literature, we identified 39 quality markers that were grouped into 10 themes: Initial Grounding Work (preparation, background); Goals, Problem Statement, or Question; Methods (general considerations); Sampling Techniques; Data Collection Techniques; Data Interpretation and Theory Generation; Measures to Optimize Rigour and Trustworthiness; Relevance to the Field; Evidence of Reflective Practice; Dissemination and Reporting. Lastly, five quality checklists were found for guiding educators in reporting their qualitative work. Conclusion Many problems that EM educators face are well-suited to exploration using qualitative methods. The results of our scoping review provide publication venues, quality indicators, and checklists that may be useful to EM educators embarking on qualitative projects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)284-292
Number of pages9
JournalCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Qualitative Research
Education
Checklist
Publications
Research

Keywords

  • academic writing
  • education scholarship
  • qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

A writer's guide to education scholarship : Qualitative education scholarship (part 2). / Chan, Teresa M.; Ting, Daniel K.; Hall, Andrew Koch; Murnaghan, Aleisha; Thoma, Brent; McEwen, Jill; Yarris, Lalena.

In: Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 284-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chan, Teresa M. ; Ting, Daniel K. ; Hall, Andrew Koch ; Murnaghan, Aleisha ; Thoma, Brent ; McEwen, Jill ; Yarris, Lalena. / A writer's guide to education scholarship : Qualitative education scholarship (part 2). In: Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 284-292.
@article{101276f60aa7418eadbcdee17ad98332,
title = "A writer's guide to education scholarship: Qualitative education scholarship (part 2)",
abstract = "Objective Education scholarship can be conducted using a variety of methods, from quantitative experiments to qualitative studies. Qualitative methods are less commonly used in emergency medicine (EM) education research but are well-suited to explore complex educational problems and generate hypotheses. We aimed to review the literature to provide resources to guide educators who wish to conduct qualitative research in EM education. Methods We conducted a scoping review to outline: 1) a list of journals that regularly publish qualitative educational papers; 2) an aggregate set of quality markers for qualitative educational research and scholarship; and 3) a list of quality checklists for qualitative educational research and scholarship. Results We found nine journals that have published more than one qualitative educational research paper in EM. From the literature, we identified 39 quality markers that were grouped into 10 themes: Initial Grounding Work (preparation, background); Goals, Problem Statement, or Question; Methods (general considerations); Sampling Techniques; Data Collection Techniques; Data Interpretation and Theory Generation; Measures to Optimize Rigour and Trustworthiness; Relevance to the Field; Evidence of Reflective Practice; Dissemination and Reporting. Lastly, five quality checklists were found for guiding educators in reporting their qualitative work. Conclusion Many problems that EM educators face are well-suited to exploration using qualitative methods. The results of our scoping review provide publication venues, quality indicators, and checklists that may be useful to EM educators embarking on qualitative projects.",
keywords = "academic writing, education scholarship, qualitative research",
author = "Chan, {Teresa M.} and Ting, {Daniel K.} and Hall, {Andrew Koch} and Aleisha Murnaghan and Brent Thoma and Jill McEwen and Lalena Yarris",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/cem.2017.25",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "284--292",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1481-8035",
publisher = "BC Decker Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A writer's guide to education scholarship

T2 - Qualitative education scholarship (part 2)

AU - Chan, Teresa M.

AU - Ting, Daniel K.

AU - Hall, Andrew Koch

AU - Murnaghan, Aleisha

AU - Thoma, Brent

AU - McEwen, Jill

AU - Yarris, Lalena

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Objective Education scholarship can be conducted using a variety of methods, from quantitative experiments to qualitative studies. Qualitative methods are less commonly used in emergency medicine (EM) education research but are well-suited to explore complex educational problems and generate hypotheses. We aimed to review the literature to provide resources to guide educators who wish to conduct qualitative research in EM education. Methods We conducted a scoping review to outline: 1) a list of journals that regularly publish qualitative educational papers; 2) an aggregate set of quality markers for qualitative educational research and scholarship; and 3) a list of quality checklists for qualitative educational research and scholarship. Results We found nine journals that have published more than one qualitative educational research paper in EM. From the literature, we identified 39 quality markers that were grouped into 10 themes: Initial Grounding Work (preparation, background); Goals, Problem Statement, or Question; Methods (general considerations); Sampling Techniques; Data Collection Techniques; Data Interpretation and Theory Generation; Measures to Optimize Rigour and Trustworthiness; Relevance to the Field; Evidence of Reflective Practice; Dissemination and Reporting. Lastly, five quality checklists were found for guiding educators in reporting their qualitative work. Conclusion Many problems that EM educators face are well-suited to exploration using qualitative methods. The results of our scoping review provide publication venues, quality indicators, and checklists that may be useful to EM educators embarking on qualitative projects.

AB - Objective Education scholarship can be conducted using a variety of methods, from quantitative experiments to qualitative studies. Qualitative methods are less commonly used in emergency medicine (EM) education research but are well-suited to explore complex educational problems and generate hypotheses. We aimed to review the literature to provide resources to guide educators who wish to conduct qualitative research in EM education. Methods We conducted a scoping review to outline: 1) a list of journals that regularly publish qualitative educational papers; 2) an aggregate set of quality markers for qualitative educational research and scholarship; and 3) a list of quality checklists for qualitative educational research and scholarship. Results We found nine journals that have published more than one qualitative educational research paper in EM. From the literature, we identified 39 quality markers that were grouped into 10 themes: Initial Grounding Work (preparation, background); Goals, Problem Statement, or Question; Methods (general considerations); Sampling Techniques; Data Collection Techniques; Data Interpretation and Theory Generation; Measures to Optimize Rigour and Trustworthiness; Relevance to the Field; Evidence of Reflective Practice; Dissemination and Reporting. Lastly, five quality checklists were found for guiding educators in reporting their qualitative work. Conclusion Many problems that EM educators face are well-suited to exploration using qualitative methods. The results of our scoping review provide publication venues, quality indicators, and checklists that may be useful to EM educators embarking on qualitative projects.

KW - academic writing

KW - education scholarship

KW - qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019594645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019594645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/cem.2017.25

DO - 10.1017/cem.2017.25

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 284

EP - 292

JO - Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 1481-8035

IS - 2

ER -