A "Three-Plus-One" Evaluation Model for Clinical Research Management

David Dilts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical research management (CRM) is a critical resource for the management of clinical trials and it requires proper evaluation. This article advances a model of evaluation that has three local levels, plus one global level, for evaluating the value of CRM. The primary level for evaluation is that of the study or processes level. The managerial or aggregate level concerns management of the portfolio of trials under the control of the CRM office. The third, often overlooked level of evaluation, is the strategic level, whose goal is encapsulated in the phrase, "doing the right trials, while doing trials right." The global ("plus one") evaluation level concerns the need to evaluate the ever-increasing number of multi-institutional and multinational studies. As there are host of evaluation metrics, this article provides representative examples of metrics at each level and provides methods that can aid in the selecting appropriate metrics for an organization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)464-477
Number of pages14
JournalEvaluation and the Health Professions
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Research
Office Management
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • CRM value
  • global evaluation
  • managerial evaluation
  • strategic evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

A "Three-Plus-One" Evaluation Model for Clinical Research Management. / Dilts, David.

In: Evaluation and the Health Professions, Vol. 36, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 464-477.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2a49d2d3ddd5483db1172da34e8cc0b9,
title = "A {"}Three-Plus-One{"} Evaluation Model for Clinical Research Management",
abstract = "Clinical research management (CRM) is a critical resource for the management of clinical trials and it requires proper evaluation. This article advances a model of evaluation that has three local levels, plus one global level, for evaluating the value of CRM. The primary level for evaluation is that of the study or processes level. The managerial or aggregate level concerns management of the portfolio of trials under the control of the CRM office. The third, often overlooked level of evaluation, is the strategic level, whose goal is encapsulated in the phrase, {"}doing the right trials, while doing trials right.{"} The global ({"}plus one{"}) evaluation level concerns the need to evaluate the ever-increasing number of multi-institutional and multinational studies. As there are host of evaluation metrics, this article provides representative examples of metrics at each level and provides methods that can aid in the selecting appropriate metrics for an organization.",
keywords = "CRM value, global evaluation, managerial evaluation, strategic evaluation",
author = "David Dilts",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0163278713499019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "464--477",
journal = "Evaluation and the Health Professions",
issn = "0163-2787",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A "Three-Plus-One" Evaluation Model for Clinical Research Management

AU - Dilts, David

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Clinical research management (CRM) is a critical resource for the management of clinical trials and it requires proper evaluation. This article advances a model of evaluation that has three local levels, plus one global level, for evaluating the value of CRM. The primary level for evaluation is that of the study or processes level. The managerial or aggregate level concerns management of the portfolio of trials under the control of the CRM office. The third, often overlooked level of evaluation, is the strategic level, whose goal is encapsulated in the phrase, "doing the right trials, while doing trials right." The global ("plus one") evaluation level concerns the need to evaluate the ever-increasing number of multi-institutional and multinational studies. As there are host of evaluation metrics, this article provides representative examples of metrics at each level and provides methods that can aid in the selecting appropriate metrics for an organization.

AB - Clinical research management (CRM) is a critical resource for the management of clinical trials and it requires proper evaluation. This article advances a model of evaluation that has three local levels, plus one global level, for evaluating the value of CRM. The primary level for evaluation is that of the study or processes level. The managerial or aggregate level concerns management of the portfolio of trials under the control of the CRM office. The third, often overlooked level of evaluation, is the strategic level, whose goal is encapsulated in the phrase, "doing the right trials, while doing trials right." The global ("plus one") evaluation level concerns the need to evaluate the ever-increasing number of multi-institutional and multinational studies. As there are host of evaluation metrics, this article provides representative examples of metrics at each level and provides methods that can aid in the selecting appropriate metrics for an organization.

KW - CRM value

KW - global evaluation

KW - managerial evaluation

KW - strategic evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887430039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887430039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0163278713499019

DO - 10.1177/0163278713499019

M3 - Article

C2 - 23908383

AN - SCOPUS:84887430039

VL - 36

SP - 464

EP - 477

JO - Evaluation and the Health Professions

JF - Evaluation and the Health Professions

SN - 0163-2787

IS - 4

ER -