A Survey of Parents' Perceptions and Use of Time-out Compared to Empirical Evidence

Andrew R. Riley, David V. Wagner, Megan E. Tudor, Katharine Zuckerman, Kurt Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To assess parents' perceptions and use of time-out (TO) in contrast to empirical indications and examine the relationship between reported implementation procedures and perceived effectiveness. Methods We surveyed parents of preschool and school-age children (n = 401, aged 15 months to 10 years) at well-child visits with regard to their awareness, perception, and usage of TO. Parents were specifically surveyed regarding TO components that have been empirically evaluated or pertain directly to its underlying behavioral principles. Descriptive analyses, group comparisons, and correlational analyses were used to characterize responses and evaluate the relationship between TO administration variation and perceived effectiveness. Results Most parents (76.8%) reported using TO in response to misbehavior, but a large majority of these parents (84.9%) reported implementing TO in a manner counter to empirical evidence. Parents who endorsed TO as effective varied significantly from those who did not on key implementation components (eg, use of a single warning). Further, several reported implementation practices were correlated with perceived effectiveness and challenging child behavior. For example, requiring a child to be calm before ending TO was positively correlated with perceived effectiveness. Conclusions These results cement TO as a widely disseminated practice but cast doubt on the fidelity with which it is typically implemented. Better methods of educating parents on evidence-based discipline are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-175
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Pediatrics
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Time Perception
Parents
Child Behavior
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • discipline
  • parenting practices
  • time-out

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

A Survey of Parents' Perceptions and Use of Time-out Compared to Empirical Evidence. / Riley, Andrew R.; Wagner, David V.; Tudor, Megan E.; Zuckerman, Katharine; Freeman, Kurt.

In: Academic Pediatrics, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.03.2017, p. 168-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Riley, Andrew R. ; Wagner, David V. ; Tudor, Megan E. ; Zuckerman, Katharine ; Freeman, Kurt. / A Survey of Parents' Perceptions and Use of Time-out Compared to Empirical Evidence. In: Academic Pediatrics. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 168-175.
@article{20da46f43d4842a38e900aa000086814,
title = "A Survey of Parents' Perceptions and Use of Time-out Compared to Empirical Evidence",
abstract = "Objective To assess parents' perceptions and use of time-out (TO) in contrast to empirical indications and examine the relationship between reported implementation procedures and perceived effectiveness. Methods We surveyed parents of preschool and school-age children (n = 401, aged 15 months to 10 years) at well-child visits with regard to their awareness, perception, and usage of TO. Parents were specifically surveyed regarding TO components that have been empirically evaluated or pertain directly to its underlying behavioral principles. Descriptive analyses, group comparisons, and correlational analyses were used to characterize responses and evaluate the relationship between TO administration variation and perceived effectiveness. Results Most parents (76.8{\%}) reported using TO in response to misbehavior, but a large majority of these parents (84.9{\%}) reported implementing TO in a manner counter to empirical evidence. Parents who endorsed TO as effective varied significantly from those who did not on key implementation components (eg, use of a single warning). Further, several reported implementation practices were correlated with perceived effectiveness and challenging child behavior. For example, requiring a child to be calm before ending TO was positively correlated with perceived effectiveness. Conclusions These results cement TO as a widely disseminated practice but cast doubt on the fidelity with which it is typically implemented. Better methods of educating parents on evidence-based discipline are needed.",
keywords = "discipline, parenting practices, time-out",
author = "Riley, {Andrew R.} and Wagner, {David V.} and Tudor, {Megan E.} and Katharine Zuckerman and Kurt Freeman",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acap.2016.08.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "168--175",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Survey of Parents' Perceptions and Use of Time-out Compared to Empirical Evidence

AU - Riley, Andrew R.

AU - Wagner, David V.

AU - Tudor, Megan E.

AU - Zuckerman, Katharine

AU - Freeman, Kurt

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Objective To assess parents' perceptions and use of time-out (TO) in contrast to empirical indications and examine the relationship between reported implementation procedures and perceived effectiveness. Methods We surveyed parents of preschool and school-age children (n = 401, aged 15 months to 10 years) at well-child visits with regard to their awareness, perception, and usage of TO. Parents were specifically surveyed regarding TO components that have been empirically evaluated or pertain directly to its underlying behavioral principles. Descriptive analyses, group comparisons, and correlational analyses were used to characterize responses and evaluate the relationship between TO administration variation and perceived effectiveness. Results Most parents (76.8%) reported using TO in response to misbehavior, but a large majority of these parents (84.9%) reported implementing TO in a manner counter to empirical evidence. Parents who endorsed TO as effective varied significantly from those who did not on key implementation components (eg, use of a single warning). Further, several reported implementation practices were correlated with perceived effectiveness and challenging child behavior. For example, requiring a child to be calm before ending TO was positively correlated with perceived effectiveness. Conclusions These results cement TO as a widely disseminated practice but cast doubt on the fidelity with which it is typically implemented. Better methods of educating parents on evidence-based discipline are needed.

AB - Objective To assess parents' perceptions and use of time-out (TO) in contrast to empirical indications and examine the relationship between reported implementation procedures and perceived effectiveness. Methods We surveyed parents of preschool and school-age children (n = 401, aged 15 months to 10 years) at well-child visits with regard to their awareness, perception, and usage of TO. Parents were specifically surveyed regarding TO components that have been empirically evaluated or pertain directly to its underlying behavioral principles. Descriptive analyses, group comparisons, and correlational analyses were used to characterize responses and evaluate the relationship between TO administration variation and perceived effectiveness. Results Most parents (76.8%) reported using TO in response to misbehavior, but a large majority of these parents (84.9%) reported implementing TO in a manner counter to empirical evidence. Parents who endorsed TO as effective varied significantly from those who did not on key implementation components (eg, use of a single warning). Further, several reported implementation practices were correlated with perceived effectiveness and challenging child behavior. For example, requiring a child to be calm before ending TO was positively correlated with perceived effectiveness. Conclusions These results cement TO as a widely disseminated practice but cast doubt on the fidelity with which it is typically implemented. Better methods of educating parents on evidence-based discipline are needed.

KW - discipline

KW - parenting practices

KW - time-out

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014377671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014377671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acap.2016.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.acap.2016.08.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 27856291

AN - SCOPUS:85014377671

VL - 17

SP - 168

EP - 175

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

IS - 2

ER -