A simplified approach to the diagnosis of elevated intra-abdominal pressure

Steven L. Lee, John T. Anderson, Eric J. Kraut, David H. Wisner, Bruce Wolfe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Previous methods described to measure bladder pressure require additional setup, making these techniques complex and time consuming. We describe a simple U-tube technique and investigate its accuracy for measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Methods: Warm saline was infused into the peritoneum of five pigs to increase IAP. Indirect methods of measuring IAP included bladder, inferior vena cava (IVC), and gastric pressures. Bladder pressure was measured by both the standard and U-tube technique. IVC pressure was measured via a femoral line and gastric pressure was transduced through an orogastric tube. In addition, 30 patients undergoing laparoscopy were prospectively investigated. Insufflated abdominal pressure readings were obtained and compared with bladder pressures measured by the U-tube technique (n = 20) and standard technique (n = 10). Results: In the animal study, U-tube manometry had the highest degree of correlation (r2 = 0.98) and the lowest bias (0.51 ± 1.63 mm Hg). The bladder pressure measured by the U-tube technique was between 0.1 and 0.9 mm Hg less than the directly measured IAP (95% confidence interval). There was a high degree of correlation between IAP and the standard technique for bladder pressure (r2 = 0.93), IVC pressure (r2 = 0.93), and gastric pressure (r2 = 0.90). Strong correlation also existed between the U-tube and standard techniques for measuring bladder pressure (r2 = 0.96). In humans, a strong correlation between insufflated abdominal pressure and bladder pressure (U-tube technique, r2 = 0.79; standard technique, r2 = 0.53) was also encountered. Conclusion: The accuracy of the U-tube manometry technique for measuring intra-abdominal pressure is comparable to previously described techniques. The U-tube technique is simple, does not require additional equipment, and can be performed by any member of the medical team.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1169-1172
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume52
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pressure
Urinary Bladder
Inferior Vena Cava
Stomach
Manometry
Peritoneum
Thigh
Laparoscopy
Reading
Swine
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Bladder pressure
  • Intra-abdominal pressure
  • U-tube manometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A simplified approach to the diagnosis of elevated intra-abdominal pressure. / Lee, Steven L.; Anderson, John T.; Kraut, Eric J.; Wisner, David H.; Wolfe, Bruce.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 52, No. 6, 2002, p. 1169-1172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Steven L. ; Anderson, John T. ; Kraut, Eric J. ; Wisner, David H. ; Wolfe, Bruce. / A simplified approach to the diagnosis of elevated intra-abdominal pressure. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2002 ; Vol. 52, No. 6. pp. 1169-1172.
@article{cab2c0f5954245819ba4f06de9c633fb,
title = "A simplified approach to the diagnosis of elevated intra-abdominal pressure",
abstract = "Background: Previous methods described to measure bladder pressure require additional setup, making these techniques complex and time consuming. We describe a simple U-tube technique and investigate its accuracy for measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Methods: Warm saline was infused into the peritoneum of five pigs to increase IAP. Indirect methods of measuring IAP included bladder, inferior vena cava (IVC), and gastric pressures. Bladder pressure was measured by both the standard and U-tube technique. IVC pressure was measured via a femoral line and gastric pressure was transduced through an orogastric tube. In addition, 30 patients undergoing laparoscopy were prospectively investigated. Insufflated abdominal pressure readings were obtained and compared with bladder pressures measured by the U-tube technique (n = 20) and standard technique (n = 10). Results: In the animal study, U-tube manometry had the highest degree of correlation (r2 = 0.98) and the lowest bias (0.51 ± 1.63 mm Hg). The bladder pressure measured by the U-tube technique was between 0.1 and 0.9 mm Hg less than the directly measured IAP (95{\%} confidence interval). There was a high degree of correlation between IAP and the standard technique for bladder pressure (r2 = 0.93), IVC pressure (r2 = 0.93), and gastric pressure (r2 = 0.90). Strong correlation also existed between the U-tube and standard techniques for measuring bladder pressure (r2 = 0.96). In humans, a strong correlation between insufflated abdominal pressure and bladder pressure (U-tube technique, r2 = 0.79; standard technique, r2 = 0.53) was also encountered. Conclusion: The accuracy of the U-tube manometry technique for measuring intra-abdominal pressure is comparable to previously described techniques. The U-tube technique is simple, does not require additional equipment, and can be performed by any member of the medical team.",
keywords = "Bladder pressure, Intra-abdominal pressure, U-tube manometry",
author = "Lee, {Steven L.} and Anderson, {John T.} and Kraut, {Eric J.} and Wisner, {David H.} and Bruce Wolfe",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "1169--1172",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A simplified approach to the diagnosis of elevated intra-abdominal pressure

AU - Lee, Steven L.

AU - Anderson, John T.

AU - Kraut, Eric J.

AU - Wisner, David H.

AU - Wolfe, Bruce

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Background: Previous methods described to measure bladder pressure require additional setup, making these techniques complex and time consuming. We describe a simple U-tube technique and investigate its accuracy for measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Methods: Warm saline was infused into the peritoneum of five pigs to increase IAP. Indirect methods of measuring IAP included bladder, inferior vena cava (IVC), and gastric pressures. Bladder pressure was measured by both the standard and U-tube technique. IVC pressure was measured via a femoral line and gastric pressure was transduced through an orogastric tube. In addition, 30 patients undergoing laparoscopy were prospectively investigated. Insufflated abdominal pressure readings were obtained and compared with bladder pressures measured by the U-tube technique (n = 20) and standard technique (n = 10). Results: In the animal study, U-tube manometry had the highest degree of correlation (r2 = 0.98) and the lowest bias (0.51 ± 1.63 mm Hg). The bladder pressure measured by the U-tube technique was between 0.1 and 0.9 mm Hg less than the directly measured IAP (95% confidence interval). There was a high degree of correlation between IAP and the standard technique for bladder pressure (r2 = 0.93), IVC pressure (r2 = 0.93), and gastric pressure (r2 = 0.90). Strong correlation also existed between the U-tube and standard techniques for measuring bladder pressure (r2 = 0.96). In humans, a strong correlation between insufflated abdominal pressure and bladder pressure (U-tube technique, r2 = 0.79; standard technique, r2 = 0.53) was also encountered. Conclusion: The accuracy of the U-tube manometry technique for measuring intra-abdominal pressure is comparable to previously described techniques. The U-tube technique is simple, does not require additional equipment, and can be performed by any member of the medical team.

AB - Background: Previous methods described to measure bladder pressure require additional setup, making these techniques complex and time consuming. We describe a simple U-tube technique and investigate its accuracy for measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Methods: Warm saline was infused into the peritoneum of five pigs to increase IAP. Indirect methods of measuring IAP included bladder, inferior vena cava (IVC), and gastric pressures. Bladder pressure was measured by both the standard and U-tube technique. IVC pressure was measured via a femoral line and gastric pressure was transduced through an orogastric tube. In addition, 30 patients undergoing laparoscopy were prospectively investigated. Insufflated abdominal pressure readings were obtained and compared with bladder pressures measured by the U-tube technique (n = 20) and standard technique (n = 10). Results: In the animal study, U-tube manometry had the highest degree of correlation (r2 = 0.98) and the lowest bias (0.51 ± 1.63 mm Hg). The bladder pressure measured by the U-tube technique was between 0.1 and 0.9 mm Hg less than the directly measured IAP (95% confidence interval). There was a high degree of correlation between IAP and the standard technique for bladder pressure (r2 = 0.93), IVC pressure (r2 = 0.93), and gastric pressure (r2 = 0.90). Strong correlation also existed between the U-tube and standard techniques for measuring bladder pressure (r2 = 0.96). In humans, a strong correlation between insufflated abdominal pressure and bladder pressure (U-tube technique, r2 = 0.79; standard technique, r2 = 0.53) was also encountered. Conclusion: The accuracy of the U-tube manometry technique for measuring intra-abdominal pressure is comparable to previously described techniques. The U-tube technique is simple, does not require additional equipment, and can be performed by any member of the medical team.

KW - Bladder pressure

KW - Intra-abdominal pressure

KW - U-tube manometry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036089063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036089063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 1169

EP - 1172

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 6

ER -