A retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors after stereotactic radiosurgery for aggressive meningiomas

Daniel J. Ferraro, Ryan K. Funk, John W. Blackett, Michelle R. Ju, Todd A. DeWees, Michael R. Chicoine, Joshua L. Dowling, Keith M. Rich, Robert E. Drzymala, Imran Zoberi, Joseph R. Simpson, Jerry J. Jaboin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: While most meningiomas are benign, aggressive meningiomas are associated with high levels of recurrence and mortality. A single institution's Gamma Knife radiosurgical experience with atypical and malignant meningiomas is presented, stratified by the most recent WHO classification.Methods: Thirty-one patients with atypical and 4 patients with malignant meningiomas treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery between July 2000 and July 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent prior surgical resection. Overall survival was the primary endpoint and rate of disease recurrence in the brain was a secondary endpoint. Patients who had previous radiotherapy or prior surgical resection were included. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate survival and identify factors predictive of recurrence and survival.Results: Post-Gamma Knife recurrence was identified in 11 patients (31.4%) with a median overall survival of 36 months and progression-free survival of 25.8 months. Nine patients (25.7%) had died. Three-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 78.0% and 65.0%, respectively. WHO grade II 3-year OS and PFS were 83.4% and 70.1%, while WHO grade III 3-year OS and PFS were 33.3% and 0%. Recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with a prior history of benign meningioma, nuclear atypia, high mitotic rate, spontaneous necrosis, and WHO grade III diagnosis on univariate analysis; only WHO grade III diagnosis was significant on multivariate analysis. Overall survival was adversely affected in patients with WHO grade III diagnosis, prior history of benign meningioma, prior fractionated radiotherapy, larger tumor volume, and higher isocenter number on univariate analysis; WHO grade III diagnosis and larger treated tumor volume were significant on multivariate analysis.Conclusion: Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas remain difficult tumors to treat. WHO grade III diagnosis and treated tumor volume were significantly predictive of recurrence and survival on multivariate analysis in aggressive meningioma patients treated with radiosurgery. Larger tumor size predicts poor survival, while nuclear atypia, necrosis, and increased mitotic rate are risk factors for recurrence. Clinical and pathologic predictors may help identify patients that are at higher risk for recurrence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number38
JournalRadiation Oncology
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 27 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aggressive
  • Anaplastic
  • Atypical
  • Gamma knife
  • Meningioma
  • Radiosurgery
  • WHO II
  • WHO III

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors after stereotactic radiosurgery for aggressive meningiomas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this