A Randomized Trial of External Practice Support to Improve Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care

Michael L. Parchman, Melissa L. Anderson, David Dorr, Lyle Fagnan, Ellen S. O'Meara, Leah Tuzzio, Robert B. Penfold, Andrea J. Cook, Jeffrey Hummel, Cullen Conway, Raja Cholan, Laura Mae Baldwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of adding various forms of enhanced external support to practice facilitation on primary care practices' clinical quality measure (CQM) performance. METHODS: Primary care practices across Washington, Oregon, and Idaho were eligible if they had fewer than 10 full-time clinicians. Practices were randomized to practice facilitation only, practice facilitation and shared learning, practice facilitation and educational outreach visits, or practice facilitation and both shared learning and educational outreach visits. All practices received up to 15 months of support. The primary outcome was the CQM for blood pressure control. Secondary outcomes were CQMs for appropriate aspirin therapy and smoking screening and cessation. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS: Of 259 practices recruited, 209 agreed to be randomized. Only 42% of those offered educational outreach visits and 27% offered shared learning participated in these enhanced supports. CQM performance improved within each study arm for all 3 cardiovascular disease CQMs. After adjusting for differences between study arms, CQM improvements in the 3 enhanced practice support arms of the study did not differ significantly from those seen in practices that received practice facilitation alone (omnibus P = .40 for blood pressure CQM). Practices randomized to receive both educational outreach visits and shared learning, however, were more likely to achieve a blood pressure performance goal in 70% of patients compared with those randomized to practice facilitation alone (relative risk = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.16-3.76). CONCLUSIONS: Although we found no significant differences in CQM performance across study arms, the ability of a practice to reach a target level of performance may be enhanced by adding both educational outreach visits and shared learning to practice facilitation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S40-S49
JournalAnnals of family medicine
Volume17
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 12 2019

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Learning
Blood Pressure
Intention to Treat Analysis
Aptitude
Smoking Cessation
Quality Improvement
Aspirin
Cardiovascular Diseases
Randomized Controlled Trials
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • cardiovascular disease
  • chronic illness
  • health promotion
  • health services
  • organizational change
  • practice-based research
  • prevention
  • primary health care
  • quality improvement
  • quantitative methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

A Randomized Trial of External Practice Support to Improve Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care. / Parchman, Michael L.; Anderson, Melissa L.; Dorr, David; Fagnan, Lyle; O'Meara, Ellen S.; Tuzzio, Leah; Penfold, Robert B.; Cook, Andrea J.; Hummel, Jeffrey; Conway, Cullen; Cholan, Raja; Baldwin, Laura Mae.

In: Annals of family medicine, Vol. 17, 12.08.2019, p. S40-S49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Parchman, ML, Anderson, ML, Dorr, D, Fagnan, L, O'Meara, ES, Tuzzio, L, Penfold, RB, Cook, AJ, Hummel, J, Conway, C, Cholan, R & Baldwin, LM 2019, 'A Randomized Trial of External Practice Support to Improve Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care', Annals of family medicine, vol. 17, pp. S40-S49. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2407
Parchman, Michael L. ; Anderson, Melissa L. ; Dorr, David ; Fagnan, Lyle ; O'Meara, Ellen S. ; Tuzzio, Leah ; Penfold, Robert B. ; Cook, Andrea J. ; Hummel, Jeffrey ; Conway, Cullen ; Cholan, Raja ; Baldwin, Laura Mae. / A Randomized Trial of External Practice Support to Improve Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care. In: Annals of family medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 17. pp. S40-S49.
@article{9d618a0399b445aa8fe9a703b8e7475b,
title = "A Randomized Trial of External Practice Support to Improve Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care",
abstract = "PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of adding various forms of enhanced external support to practice facilitation on primary care practices' clinical quality measure (CQM) performance. METHODS: Primary care practices across Washington, Oregon, and Idaho were eligible if they had fewer than 10 full-time clinicians. Practices were randomized to practice facilitation only, practice facilitation and shared learning, practice facilitation and educational outreach visits, or practice facilitation and both shared learning and educational outreach visits. All practices received up to 15 months of support. The primary outcome was the CQM for blood pressure control. Secondary outcomes were CQMs for appropriate aspirin therapy and smoking screening and cessation. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS: Of 259 practices recruited, 209 agreed to be randomized. Only 42{\%} of those offered educational outreach visits and 27{\%} offered shared learning participated in these enhanced supports. CQM performance improved within each study arm for all 3 cardiovascular disease CQMs. After adjusting for differences between study arms, CQM improvements in the 3 enhanced practice support arms of the study did not differ significantly from those seen in practices that received practice facilitation alone (omnibus P = .40 for blood pressure CQM). Practices randomized to receive both educational outreach visits and shared learning, however, were more likely to achieve a blood pressure performance goal in 70{\%} of patients compared with those randomized to practice facilitation alone (relative risk = 2.09; 95{\%} CI, 1.16-3.76). CONCLUSIONS: Although we found no significant differences in CQM performance across study arms, the ability of a practice to reach a target level of performance may be enhanced by adding both educational outreach visits and shared learning to practice facilitation.",
keywords = "cardiovascular disease, chronic illness, health promotion, health services, organizational change, practice-based research, prevention, primary health care, quality improvement, quantitative methods",
author = "Parchman, {Michael L.} and Anderson, {Melissa L.} and David Dorr and Lyle Fagnan and O'Meara, {Ellen S.} and Leah Tuzzio and Penfold, {Robert B.} and Cook, {Andrea J.} and Jeffrey Hummel and Cullen Conway and Raja Cholan and Baldwin, {Laura Mae}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1370/afm.2407",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "S40--S49",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Randomized Trial of External Practice Support to Improve Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care

AU - Parchman, Michael L.

AU - Anderson, Melissa L.

AU - Dorr, David

AU - Fagnan, Lyle

AU - O'Meara, Ellen S.

AU - Tuzzio, Leah

AU - Penfold, Robert B.

AU - Cook, Andrea J.

AU - Hummel, Jeffrey

AU - Conway, Cullen

AU - Cholan, Raja

AU - Baldwin, Laura Mae

PY - 2019/8/12

Y1 - 2019/8/12

N2 - PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of adding various forms of enhanced external support to practice facilitation on primary care practices' clinical quality measure (CQM) performance. METHODS: Primary care practices across Washington, Oregon, and Idaho were eligible if they had fewer than 10 full-time clinicians. Practices were randomized to practice facilitation only, practice facilitation and shared learning, practice facilitation and educational outreach visits, or practice facilitation and both shared learning and educational outreach visits. All practices received up to 15 months of support. The primary outcome was the CQM for blood pressure control. Secondary outcomes were CQMs for appropriate aspirin therapy and smoking screening and cessation. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS: Of 259 practices recruited, 209 agreed to be randomized. Only 42% of those offered educational outreach visits and 27% offered shared learning participated in these enhanced supports. CQM performance improved within each study arm for all 3 cardiovascular disease CQMs. After adjusting for differences between study arms, CQM improvements in the 3 enhanced practice support arms of the study did not differ significantly from those seen in practices that received practice facilitation alone (omnibus P = .40 for blood pressure CQM). Practices randomized to receive both educational outreach visits and shared learning, however, were more likely to achieve a blood pressure performance goal in 70% of patients compared with those randomized to practice facilitation alone (relative risk = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.16-3.76). CONCLUSIONS: Although we found no significant differences in CQM performance across study arms, the ability of a practice to reach a target level of performance may be enhanced by adding both educational outreach visits and shared learning to practice facilitation.

AB - PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of adding various forms of enhanced external support to practice facilitation on primary care practices' clinical quality measure (CQM) performance. METHODS: Primary care practices across Washington, Oregon, and Idaho were eligible if they had fewer than 10 full-time clinicians. Practices were randomized to practice facilitation only, practice facilitation and shared learning, practice facilitation and educational outreach visits, or practice facilitation and both shared learning and educational outreach visits. All practices received up to 15 months of support. The primary outcome was the CQM for blood pressure control. Secondary outcomes were CQMs for appropriate aspirin therapy and smoking screening and cessation. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS: Of 259 practices recruited, 209 agreed to be randomized. Only 42% of those offered educational outreach visits and 27% offered shared learning participated in these enhanced supports. CQM performance improved within each study arm for all 3 cardiovascular disease CQMs. After adjusting for differences between study arms, CQM improvements in the 3 enhanced practice support arms of the study did not differ significantly from those seen in practices that received practice facilitation alone (omnibus P = .40 for blood pressure CQM). Practices randomized to receive both educational outreach visits and shared learning, however, were more likely to achieve a blood pressure performance goal in 70% of patients compared with those randomized to practice facilitation alone (relative risk = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.16-3.76). CONCLUSIONS: Although we found no significant differences in CQM performance across study arms, the ability of a practice to reach a target level of performance may be enhanced by adding both educational outreach visits and shared learning to practice facilitation.

KW - cardiovascular disease

KW - chronic illness

KW - health promotion

KW - health services

KW - organizational change

KW - practice-based research

KW - prevention

KW - primary health care

KW - quality improvement

KW - quantitative methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072149330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072149330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.2407

DO - 10.1370/afm.2407

M3 - Article

C2 - 31405875

AN - SCOPUS:85072149330

VL - 17

SP - S40-S49

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

ER -